美国无形的知识产权帝国及其困境

Li Yinliang
{"title":"美国无形的知识产权帝国及其困境","authors":"Li Yinliang","doi":"10.1080/20517483.2014.11424489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States of America has a long tradition of pursuing a commercial empire to avoid the possible fate of decline or dissolution facing every traditional empire. Since the early 1980s, domestic intellectual property regime had been fortified in the US to promote innovations and high-tech industry. Meanwhile, international intellectual property system had been globalized by establishment of the WTO and enforcement of the TRIPS in 1995 which could safeguard the technical and the corresponding commercial advantages of the US on world markets. An intangible empire of intellectual property rights had been constructed by the US for maximization of its interests. The distinctly American empire also has its intrinsic dilemmas. Internationally it could limit development of economy and social welfare of developing countries, and domestically it may incur patent trolls as such that may ruin rationale of the patent regime, and both may cause alienation of intellectual property regime that may further risk or demolish the intangible empire itself. Reasonable measures shall be taken to control the over-stretched intangible empire of intellectual property rights and to avoid its possible negative effects upon public interest both domestically and internationally.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An American Intangible Empire of Intellectual Property Rights and its Dilemmas\",\"authors\":\"Li Yinliang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20517483.2014.11424489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States of America has a long tradition of pursuing a commercial empire to avoid the possible fate of decline or dissolution facing every traditional empire. Since the early 1980s, domestic intellectual property regime had been fortified in the US to promote innovations and high-tech industry. Meanwhile, international intellectual property system had been globalized by establishment of the WTO and enforcement of the TRIPS in 1995 which could safeguard the technical and the corresponding commercial advantages of the US on world markets. An intangible empire of intellectual property rights had been constructed by the US for maximization of its interests. The distinctly American empire also has its intrinsic dilemmas. Internationally it could limit development of economy and social welfare of developing countries, and domestically it may incur patent trolls as such that may ruin rationale of the patent regime, and both may cause alienation of intellectual property regime that may further risk or demolish the intangible empire itself. Reasonable measures shall be taken to control the over-stretched intangible empire of intellectual property rights and to avoid its possible negative effects upon public interest both domestically and internationally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2014.11424489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2014.11424489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美利坚合众国有追求商业帝国的悠久传统,以避免每个传统帝国可能面临的衰落或解体的命运。自上世纪80年代初以来,美国加强了国内知识产权制度,以促进创新和高科技产业。同时,随着1995年WTO的成立和TRIPS的实施,国际知识产权制度已经全球化,这可以保障美国在世界市场上的技术和相应的商业优势。美国为了实现自身利益最大化,构建了一个无形的知识产权帝国。独特的美利坚帝国也有其内在的困境。在国际上,它可能会限制发展中国家的经济发展和社会福利,在国内,它可能会招致专利流氓,这样可能会破坏专利制度的基本原理,两者都可能导致知识产权制度的异化,可能进一步危及或摧毁无形帝国本身。应采取合理措施控制知识产权无形帝国的过度扩张,避免其对国内外公共利益的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An American Intangible Empire of Intellectual Property Rights and its Dilemmas
The United States of America has a long tradition of pursuing a commercial empire to avoid the possible fate of decline or dissolution facing every traditional empire. Since the early 1980s, domestic intellectual property regime had been fortified in the US to promote innovations and high-tech industry. Meanwhile, international intellectual property system had been globalized by establishment of the WTO and enforcement of the TRIPS in 1995 which could safeguard the technical and the corresponding commercial advantages of the US on world markets. An intangible empire of intellectual property rights had been constructed by the US for maximization of its interests. The distinctly American empire also has its intrinsic dilemmas. Internationally it could limit development of economy and social welfare of developing countries, and domestically it may incur patent trolls as such that may ruin rationale of the patent regime, and both may cause alienation of intellectual property regime that may further risk or demolish the intangible empire itself. Reasonable measures shall be taken to control the over-stretched intangible empire of intellectual property rights and to avoid its possible negative effects upon public interest both domestically and internationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信