公共服务和家庭经济资源的分配

François Marical, Marco Mira d’Ercole, M. Vaalavuo, G. Verbist
{"title":"公共服务和家庭经济资源的分配","authors":"François Marical, Marco Mira d’Ercole, M. Vaalavuo, G. Verbist","doi":"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2008-ART1-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional income distribution statistics subtract taxes from household income but do not take into account the distributional effects of the services financed through these taxes. As many of the functions of government are available to the population free of charge or at a subsidised rate, this means that income distribution figures exaggerate the degree of inequality in the distribution of resources. This article examines the extent to which this is the case, and assesses whether statements about the relative inequality prevailing in different countries are reliable. Estimates of the impact of government services on the static distribution of household income, based on two different approaches, show that publicly-provided goods and services significantly narrow the dispersion of income inequality across countries with only small changes in the ranking of individual countries, and that the effects are larger when looking at the extremes of the distributions.","PeriodicalId":416490,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publicly provided services and the distribution of households' economic resources\",\"authors\":\"François Marical, Marco Mira d’Ercole, M. Vaalavuo, G. Verbist\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2008-ART1-EN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional income distribution statistics subtract taxes from household income but do not take into account the distributional effects of the services financed through these taxes. As many of the functions of government are available to the population free of charge or at a subsidised rate, this means that income distribution figures exaggerate the degree of inequality in the distribution of resources. This article examines the extent to which this is the case, and assesses whether statements about the relative inequality prevailing in different countries are reliable. Estimates of the impact of government services on the static distribution of household income, based on two different approaches, show that publicly-provided goods and services significantly narrow the dispersion of income inequality across countries with only small changes in the ranking of individual countries, and that the effects are larger when looking at the extremes of the distributions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2008-ART1-EN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2008-ART1-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

传统的收入分配统计从家庭收入中减去税收,但没有考虑到通过这些税收资助的服务的分配影响。由于政府的许多职能都是免费或按补贴费率提供给民众的,这意味着收入分配数据夸大了资源分配的不平等程度。本文考察了这种情况的程度,并评估了关于不同国家普遍存在的相对不平等的陈述是否可靠。基于两种不同方法对政府服务对家庭收入静态分配影响的估计表明,公共提供的商品和服务显著缩小了各国之间收入不平等的差距,单个国家的排名仅发生了微小变化,而在极端分布情况下,这种影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Publicly provided services and the distribution of households' economic resources
Conventional income distribution statistics subtract taxes from household income but do not take into account the distributional effects of the services financed through these taxes. As many of the functions of government are available to the population free of charge or at a subsidised rate, this means that income distribution figures exaggerate the degree of inequality in the distribution of resources. This article examines the extent to which this is the case, and assesses whether statements about the relative inequality prevailing in different countries are reliable. Estimates of the impact of government services on the static distribution of household income, based on two different approaches, show that publicly-provided goods and services significantly narrow the dispersion of income inequality across countries with only small changes in the ranking of individual countries, and that the effects are larger when looking at the extremes of the distributions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信