故障预测模型在新环境中的转换

Jesper Derehag, E. Weyuker, T. Ostrand, Daniel Sundmark
{"title":"故障预测模型在新环境中的转换","authors":"Jesper Derehag, E. Weyuker, T. Ostrand, Daniel Sundmark","doi":"10.1109/EDCC.2016.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe the application and evaluation of fault prediction algorithms to a project developed by a Swedish company that transitioned from waterfall to agile development methods. The project used two different version control systems and a separate bug tracking system during its lifetime. The algorithms were originally designed for use on systems implemented with a traditional waterfall process at American companies that maintained their project records in an integrated database system that combined bug recording and version control. We compare the performance of the original prediction model on the American systems to the results obtained in the Swedish environment in both its pre-agile and agile stages. We also consider the impact of additional variables in the model.","PeriodicalId":166039,"journal":{"name":"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning Fault Prediction Models to a New Environment\",\"authors\":\"Jesper Derehag, E. Weyuker, T. Ostrand, Daniel Sundmark\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDCC.2016.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We describe the application and evaluation of fault prediction algorithms to a project developed by a Swedish company that transitioned from waterfall to agile development methods. The project used two different version control systems and a separate bug tracking system during its lifetime. The algorithms were originally designed for use on systems implemented with a traditional waterfall process at American companies that maintained their project records in an integrated database system that combined bug recording and version control. We compare the performance of the original prediction model on the American systems to the results obtained in the Swedish environment in both its pre-agile and agile stages. We also consider the impact of additional variables in the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC.2016.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC.2016.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文描述了故障预测算法在瑞典一家公司开发的项目中的应用和评估,该项目由瀑布开发方法过渡到敏捷开发方法。该项目在其生命周期中使用了两个不同的版本控制系统和一个单独的bug跟踪系统。这些算法最初是为美国公司使用传统瀑布过程实现的系统而设计的,这些公司将项目记录保存在一个集成的数据库系统中,该数据库系统结合了错误记录和版本控制。我们将原始预测模型在美国系统上的性能与在瑞典环境中在敏捷前和敏捷阶段获得的结果进行了比较。我们还考虑了模型中其他变量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning Fault Prediction Models to a New Environment
We describe the application and evaluation of fault prediction algorithms to a project developed by a Swedish company that transitioned from waterfall to agile development methods. The project used two different version control systems and a separate bug tracking system during its lifetime. The algorithms were originally designed for use on systems implemented with a traditional waterfall process at American companies that maintained their project records in an integrated database system that combined bug recording and version control. We compare the performance of the original prediction model on the American systems to the results obtained in the Swedish environment in both its pre-agile and agile stages. We also consider the impact of additional variables in the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信