Yenny Puspita Sari, Masri Masri
{"title":"KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI TERBIMBING DAN MEANS ENDS ANALYSIS","authors":"Yenny Puspita Sari, Masri Masri","doi":"10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis  treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model.  Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model","PeriodicalId":135040,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在观察引导性探究学习模式和目的分析(MEA)学习模式下数学问题解决学生的差异。本研究为亚打明古鲁SMPN 14的准试验研究。本研究的总体为所有VIII班学生,研究样本为VIII I班作为实验I班,采用引导性探究模型处理,VIII 3班作为实验II班,采用均值分析模型处理,VIII 2班作为对照班,采用常规模型处理。利用数学解题能力测试对学生成绩学习进行数据收集,分为前测和后测两部分。所得数据采用单路ANAVA分析,并继续进行BNT测试。从ANAVA结果来看,实验一班、实验二班和控制班学生的数学问题解决能力存在差异。从BNT测验来看,实验组I给予引导性探究,实验组II给予均值分析处理之间在数学解题能力上无差异;而实验组I(引导探究)和实验组II(目的分析)在数学上解决问题的能力是有差异的,并且在接受引导探究模型的学生中获得了最高的平均分。关键词:学生数学解题能力引导探究模式目的分析模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI TERBIMBING DAN MEANS ENDS ANALYSIS
In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis  treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model.  Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信