基于盲源分离算法的FMRI数据分析:非高斯特性的比较研究

M. Ghasemi, A. Mahloojifar
{"title":"基于盲源分离算法的FMRI数据分析:非高斯特性的比较研究","authors":"M. Ghasemi, A. Mahloojifar","doi":"10.1109/IRANIANCEE.2010.5507112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) data has proven to be quite fruitful. In this sense, an important problem is different nongaussian properties of FMRI data that should be considered in ICA application. In this paper, we have experimentally compared nongaussian source separation ability of three ICA/BSS approaches for fMRI: Infomax, FastICA and JADE. The comparison study used both simulated fMRI-like data generated using the synthesis model and actual fMRI data performing an audio-visual stimulation task. The results were evaluated by task-related activation maps and associated time-courses. Based on our result, Infomax emerged as a reliable choice for the task followed by JADE. FastICA didn't perform reliably especially for sub-gaussian sources.","PeriodicalId":282587,"journal":{"name":"2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FMRI data analysis by blind source separation algorithms: A comparison study for nongaussian properties\",\"authors\":\"M. Ghasemi, A. Mahloojifar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IRANIANCEE.2010.5507112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The application of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) data has proven to be quite fruitful. In this sense, an important problem is different nongaussian properties of FMRI data that should be considered in ICA application. In this paper, we have experimentally compared nongaussian source separation ability of three ICA/BSS approaches for fMRI: Infomax, FastICA and JADE. The comparison study used both simulated fMRI-like data generated using the synthesis model and actual fMRI data performing an audio-visual stimulation task. The results were evaluated by task-related activation maps and associated time-courses. Based on our result, Infomax emerged as a reliable choice for the task followed by JADE. FastICA didn't perform reliably especially for sub-gaussian sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRANIANCEE.2010.5507112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRANIANCEE.2010.5507112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

独立分量分析(ICA)在功能磁共振成像(FMRI)数据中的应用已被证明是卓有成效的。从这个意义上说,在ICA应用中应该考虑的一个重要问题是FMRI数据的不同非高斯特性。在本文中,我们实验比较了三种用于fMRI的ICA/BSS方法:Infomax, FastICA和JADE的非高斯源分离能力。对比研究使用了合成模型生成的模拟fMRI样数据和执行视听刺激任务的实际fMRI数据。结果通过任务相关的激活图和相关的时间过程来评估。根据我们的结果,对于JADE之后的任务,Infomax是一个可靠的选择。FastICA表现不可靠,特别是对于亚高斯源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FMRI data analysis by blind source separation algorithms: A comparison study for nongaussian properties
The application of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) data has proven to be quite fruitful. In this sense, an important problem is different nongaussian properties of FMRI data that should be considered in ICA application. In this paper, we have experimentally compared nongaussian source separation ability of three ICA/BSS approaches for fMRI: Infomax, FastICA and JADE. The comparison study used both simulated fMRI-like data generated using the synthesis model and actual fMRI data performing an audio-visual stimulation task. The results were evaluated by task-related activation maps and associated time-courses. Based on our result, Infomax emerged as a reliable choice for the task followed by JADE. FastICA didn't perform reliably especially for sub-gaussian sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信