计算电力零售灵活性的价值,领先并平衡市场

A. V. D. Veen, M. Kaisers
{"title":"计算电力零售灵活性的价值,领先并平衡市场","authors":"A. V. D. Veen, M. Kaisers","doi":"10.1109/ISGTEurope.2016.7856226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable generation of energy is becoming more affordable, and is therefore increasingly adopted to match local demand. In addition, storage and demand response solutions have reached the market, which provides flexibility and thereby facilitates intelligent energy management. It has been suggested that this bottom-up flexibility should contribute to the balancing of the future smart grid, but financial incentives have so far been elusive. This article presents computations that assess the profitability of intelligent energy management for three different value propositions: increasing self-sufficiency under typical retail tariffs, or participating in ahead or balancing market price fluctuations, specifically in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy. First, an upper bound valuation of flexibility is computed from 2013 market data. Second, a technology-neutral profit analysis is proposed and demonstrated on selected technologies. Our simulations indicate the highest value for flexibility in the Dutch and German imbalance markets (7.7 & 9.4 €c/kWh) and the Dutch reserve market (10.4 €c/kWh), and for small prosumers in the German and Italian retail markets (12 & 10 €c/kWh). Results indicate that demand response with sufficiently low activation costs can be valorized in electricity markets, which innovative tariffs can exploit for balancing of the future smart grid.","PeriodicalId":330869,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe)","volume":"7 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computing the value of flexibility in electricity retail, ahead and balancing markets\",\"authors\":\"A. V. D. Veen, M. Kaisers\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISGTEurope.2016.7856226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Renewable generation of energy is becoming more affordable, and is therefore increasingly adopted to match local demand. In addition, storage and demand response solutions have reached the market, which provides flexibility and thereby facilitates intelligent energy management. It has been suggested that this bottom-up flexibility should contribute to the balancing of the future smart grid, but financial incentives have so far been elusive. This article presents computations that assess the profitability of intelligent energy management for three different value propositions: increasing self-sufficiency under typical retail tariffs, or participating in ahead or balancing market price fluctuations, specifically in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy. First, an upper bound valuation of flexibility is computed from 2013 market data. Second, a technology-neutral profit analysis is proposed and demonstrated on selected technologies. Our simulations indicate the highest value for flexibility in the Dutch and German imbalance markets (7.7 & 9.4 €c/kWh) and the Dutch reserve market (10.4 €c/kWh), and for small prosumers in the German and Italian retail markets (12 & 10 €c/kWh). Results indicate that demand response with sufficiently low activation costs can be valorized in electricity markets, which innovative tariffs can exploit for balancing of the future smart grid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe)\",\"volume\":\"7 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2016.7856226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2016.7856226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

可再生能源发电正变得越来越便宜,因此越来越多地采用以满足当地需求。此外,存储和需求响应解决方案已经进入市场,提供了灵活性,从而促进了智能能源管理。有人建议,这种自下而上的灵活性应该有助于未来智能电网的平衡,但到目前为止,财政激励还难以捉摸。本文给出了评估智能能源管理在三种不同价值主张下的盈利能力的计算:在典型零售电价下提高自给自足,或提前参与或平衡市场价格波动,特别是在荷兰、德国和意大利。首先,根据2013年市场数据计算弹性估值上限。其次,提出了技术中性的利润分析,并在选定的技术上进行了论证。我们的模拟表明,荷兰和德国的不平衡市场(7.7和9.4欧元/千瓦时)和荷兰的储备市场(10.4欧元/千瓦时)以及德国和意大利零售市场的小生产者(12和10欧元/千瓦时)的灵活性价值最高。结果表明,激活成本足够低的需求响应可以在电力市场中得到稳定,创新电价可以用于未来智能电网的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computing the value of flexibility in electricity retail, ahead and balancing markets
Renewable generation of energy is becoming more affordable, and is therefore increasingly adopted to match local demand. In addition, storage and demand response solutions have reached the market, which provides flexibility and thereby facilitates intelligent energy management. It has been suggested that this bottom-up flexibility should contribute to the balancing of the future smart grid, but financial incentives have so far been elusive. This article presents computations that assess the profitability of intelligent energy management for three different value propositions: increasing self-sufficiency under typical retail tariffs, or participating in ahead or balancing market price fluctuations, specifically in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy. First, an upper bound valuation of flexibility is computed from 2013 market data. Second, a technology-neutral profit analysis is proposed and demonstrated on selected technologies. Our simulations indicate the highest value for flexibility in the Dutch and German imbalance markets (7.7 & 9.4 €c/kWh) and the Dutch reserve market (10.4 €c/kWh), and for small prosumers in the German and Italian retail markets (12 & 10 €c/kWh). Results indicate that demand response with sufficiently low activation costs can be valorized in electricity markets, which innovative tariffs can exploit for balancing of the future smart grid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信