在几何教学中培养学生的创新能力

Dybyspayev Bolatzhan
{"title":"在几何教学中培养学生的创新能力","authors":"Dybyspayev Bolatzhan","doi":"10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses possible approaches for developing the creative abilities of secondary school students in the process of teaching geometry. The main disadvantages that hinder creative development discovered based on a comparative analysis of geometry textbooks by Russian scientists. These disadvantages are axiomatic methods, excessive theorization, non-systematic set of tasks, complex definitions etc. The author proposes the study of planimetry using the properties of simple geometric shapes without invoking axioms. As a concrete example of that, proof of triangle equality that is based on the property of \"corresponding chords of angles\" is demonstrated. Furthermore, the equality outcome is used to study the properties and features of other figures. Formulation of parallel postulates is simplified using formulas for the areas of a rectangle and a circle, and the circumference of a circle as the starting axioms. The author suggests a three-level system of tasks for each topic. The first level is designed to test the comprehensibility of the theoretical material. The second level applies the acquired knowledge in practice. The third level of tasks is intended to develop an independent study and critical thinking skills of a student. Additionally, at the end of each chapter, a wide range of extra tasks is given. Preparation for Science Olympiads and science fairs should be systematic. We succeeded at formulating general provisions for the management of scientific projects of schoolchildren in mathematics. The article provides an example of such implementation related to learning a special property of trapezoids.","PeriodicalId":346339,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing students’ creative skills during the process of teaching geometry\",\"authors\":\"Dybyspayev Bolatzhan\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses possible approaches for developing the creative abilities of secondary school students in the process of teaching geometry. The main disadvantages that hinder creative development discovered based on a comparative analysis of geometry textbooks by Russian scientists. These disadvantages are axiomatic methods, excessive theorization, non-systematic set of tasks, complex definitions etc. The author proposes the study of planimetry using the properties of simple geometric shapes without invoking axioms. As a concrete example of that, proof of triangle equality that is based on the property of \\\"corresponding chords of angles\\\" is demonstrated. Furthermore, the equality outcome is used to study the properties and features of other figures. Formulation of parallel postulates is simplified using formulas for the areas of a rectangle and a circle, and the circumference of a circle as the starting axioms. The author suggests a three-level system of tasks for each topic. The first level is designed to test the comprehensibility of the theoretical material. The second level applies the acquired knowledge in practice. The third level of tasks is intended to develop an independent study and critical thinking skills of a student. Additionally, at the end of each chapter, a wide range of extra tasks is given. Preparation for Science Olympiads and science fairs should be systematic. We succeeded at formulating general provisions for the management of scientific projects of schoolchildren in mathematics. The article provides an example of such implementation related to learning a special property of trapezoids.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在中学几何教学过程中培养中学生创新能力的可能途径。通过对俄罗斯科学家几何学教科书的对比分析,发现了阻碍创造性发展的主要弊端。这些缺点是公理化的方法,过度理论化,非系统的任务集,复杂的定义等。作者提出利用简单几何形状的性质来研究平面学,而不需要援引公理。作为一个具体的例子,给出了基于“角的对应和弦”性质的三角形等式的证明。此外,还利用等式结果来研究其他图形的性质和特征。用矩形和圆的面积公式以及圆的周长公式作为起始公理,简化了平行公设的公式。作者建议为每个主题设置三级任务系统。第一个层次是测试理论材料的可理解性。第二层次是将所学知识应用于实践。第三级任务旨在培养学生的独立学习和批判性思维能力。此外,在每一章的末尾,给出了广泛的额外任务。科学奥林匹克竞赛和科学博览会的准备工作应该是系统化的。我们成功地制定了管理小学生数学科学项目的一般规定。本文提供了一个与学习梯形的特殊性质有关的实现示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing students’ creative skills during the process of teaching geometry
This article discusses possible approaches for developing the creative abilities of secondary school students in the process of teaching geometry. The main disadvantages that hinder creative development discovered based on a comparative analysis of geometry textbooks by Russian scientists. These disadvantages are axiomatic methods, excessive theorization, non-systematic set of tasks, complex definitions etc. The author proposes the study of planimetry using the properties of simple geometric shapes without invoking axioms. As a concrete example of that, proof of triangle equality that is based on the property of "corresponding chords of angles" is demonstrated. Furthermore, the equality outcome is used to study the properties and features of other figures. Formulation of parallel postulates is simplified using formulas for the areas of a rectangle and a circle, and the circumference of a circle as the starting axioms. The author suggests a three-level system of tasks for each topic. The first level is designed to test the comprehensibility of the theoretical material. The second level applies the acquired knowledge in practice. The third level of tasks is intended to develop an independent study and critical thinking skills of a student. Additionally, at the end of each chapter, a wide range of extra tasks is given. Preparation for Science Olympiads and science fairs should be systematic. We succeeded at formulating general provisions for the management of scientific projects of schoolchildren in mathematics. The article provides an example of such implementation related to learning a special property of trapezoids.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信