劳动力市场有多不景气?这取决于你对Slack的定义

Murat Tasci, Randal J. Verbrugge
{"title":"劳动力市场有多不景气?这取决于你对Slack的定义","authors":"Murat Tasci, Randal J. Verbrugge","doi":"10.26509/FRBC-EC-201421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimates of labor market slack can diverge a great deal depending on how slack is defined. We calculate slack using five different concepts that all focus on a single labor market indicator, the unemployment rate. We show that the estimates all provide useful—but different—information. We argue that choosing the best measure of slack depends on the question being asked. If the question is, “Has the unemployment rate reached its longer-run normal level?” then our answer is, “Almost.” But significant uncertainty surrounds the estimates; and others may wish to consider additional labor market indicators.","PeriodicalId":368681,"journal":{"name":"Economic commentary","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Slack Is in the Labor Market? That Depends on What You Mean by Slack\",\"authors\":\"Murat Tasci, Randal J. Verbrugge\",\"doi\":\"10.26509/FRBC-EC-201421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Estimates of labor market slack can diverge a great deal depending on how slack is defined. We calculate slack using five different concepts that all focus on a single labor market indicator, the unemployment rate. We show that the estimates all provide useful—but different—information. We argue that choosing the best measure of slack depends on the question being asked. If the question is, “Has the unemployment rate reached its longer-run normal level?” then our answer is, “Almost.” But significant uncertainty surrounds the estimates; and others may wish to consider additional labor market indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic commentary\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic commentary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26509/FRBC-EC-201421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26509/FRBC-EC-201421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

根据对劳动力市场松弛的定义,对劳动力市场松弛的估计可能存在很大分歧。我们使用五个不同的概念来计算闲置,这些概念都关注于一个单一的劳动力市场指标,即失业率。我们表明,这些估计都提供了有用但不同的信息。我们认为,选择衡量闲置的最佳方法取决于所提出的问题。如果问题是“失业率已经达到长期正常水平了吗?”那么我们的回答是:“差不多。”但这些估计存在很大的不确定性;其他国家可能希望考虑更多的劳动力市场指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Much Slack Is in the Labor Market? That Depends on What You Mean by Slack
Estimates of labor market slack can diverge a great deal depending on how slack is defined. We calculate slack using five different concepts that all focus on a single labor market indicator, the unemployment rate. We show that the estimates all provide useful—but different—information. We argue that choosing the best measure of slack depends on the question being asked. If the question is, “Has the unemployment rate reached its longer-run normal level?” then our answer is, “Almost.” But significant uncertainty surrounds the estimates; and others may wish to consider additional labor market indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书