决策支持中改进人类自主团队的明确应急计划

C. Brinton, Alicia Borgman Fernandes, Curt Kaler
{"title":"决策支持中改进人类自主团队的明确应急计划","authors":"C. Brinton, Alicia Borgman Fernandes, Curt Kaler","doi":"10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the National Airspace System (NAS) evolves into a more automated system, it will be essential that human operators can effectively team with their automated Decision Support Systems (DSSs) to manage the performance of the system. When automated systems recommend courses of action, the human operator must understand the operational recommendations with sufficient depth and clarity to evaluate their appropriateness and monitor the performance of the system. Significant shortcomings exist in the current state-of-the-art in Air Traffic Management (ATM) DSSs that cause human specialists to distrust the automation’s recommendations and information provided by the system.The focus of the research effort described herein is to identify methods, algorithms, and an overall framework in which ATM DSSs can reason about the appropriate contingency plans to consider in different operational scenarios and communicate the contingency plan to the human specialists to fulfill their information needs. This effort also studied approaches to automatically predict the effectiveness of contingency plans, so that the ATM DSS can determine when a given contingency is no longer the best option and a new ‘plan B’ should be considered.","PeriodicalId":424869,"journal":{"name":"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explicit Contingency Planning For Improved Human-Autonomy Teaming In Decision Support\",\"authors\":\"C. Brinton, Alicia Borgman Fernandes, Curt Kaler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the National Airspace System (NAS) evolves into a more automated system, it will be essential that human operators can effectively team with their automated Decision Support Systems (DSSs) to manage the performance of the system. When automated systems recommend courses of action, the human operator must understand the operational recommendations with sufficient depth and clarity to evaluate their appropriateness and monitor the performance of the system. Significant shortcomings exist in the current state-of-the-art in Air Traffic Management (ATM) DSSs that cause human specialists to distrust the automation’s recommendations and information provided by the system.The focus of the research effort described herein is to identify methods, algorithms, and an overall framework in which ATM DSSs can reason about the appropriate contingency plans to consider in different operational scenarios and communicate the contingency plan to the human specialists to fulfill their information needs. This effort also studied approaches to automatically predict the effectiveness of contingency plans, so that the ATM DSS can determine when a given contingency is no longer the best option and a new ‘plan B’ should be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着国家空域系统(NAS)向更加自动化的系统发展,人类操作员能够有效地与他们的自动化决策支持系统(DSSs)合作来管理系统的性能将是至关重要的。当自动化系统推荐行动方案时,人类操作员必须充分深入和清晰地理解操作建议,以评估其适当性并监控系统的性能。当前最先进的空中交通管理(ATM) DSSs存在重大缺陷,导致人类专家不信任系统提供的自动化建议和信息。本文所描述的研究工作的重点是确定方法、算法和总体框架,在该框架中,ATM DSSs可以推断出在不同操作场景中考虑的适当应急计划,并将应急计划传达给人类专家,以满足他们的信息需求。这项工作还研究了自动预测应急计划有效性的方法,以便ATM DSS可以确定何时给定的应急计划不再是最佳选择,而应该考虑新的“B计划”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explicit Contingency Planning For Improved Human-Autonomy Teaming In Decision Support
As the National Airspace System (NAS) evolves into a more automated system, it will be essential that human operators can effectively team with their automated Decision Support Systems (DSSs) to manage the performance of the system. When automated systems recommend courses of action, the human operator must understand the operational recommendations with sufficient depth and clarity to evaluate their appropriateness and monitor the performance of the system. Significant shortcomings exist in the current state-of-the-art in Air Traffic Management (ATM) DSSs that cause human specialists to distrust the automation’s recommendations and information provided by the system.The focus of the research effort described herein is to identify methods, algorithms, and an overall framework in which ATM DSSs can reason about the appropriate contingency plans to consider in different operational scenarios and communicate the contingency plan to the human specialists to fulfill their information needs. This effort also studied approaches to automatically predict the effectiveness of contingency plans, so that the ATM DSS can determine when a given contingency is no longer the best option and a new ‘plan B’ should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信