几个变量占美国州一级COVID死亡人数差异的70%以上

Joseph Sill
{"title":"几个变量占美国州一级COVID死亡人数差异的70%以上","authors":"Joseph Sill","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3869984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A U.S. state-level analysis of factors associated with COVID-19 deaths reveals inequality (as defined by the Gini coefficient) to be far and away the strongest single-variable predictor, capturing 40% of vari ance in COVID deaths and 49% of variance in all-cause excess deaths since the start of the pandemic. A linear regression model with 5 independent variables accounts for over 70% of variation in COVID deaths,as does a 4-variable linear regression model for all-cause excess deaths. Similar models for COVID and all-cause excess deaths since October 1achieve similar results. Coefficients are highly significant (p <0.01) in almost all cases. A consistent finding across all 4 models is that a state’s relative humidity is strongly associated with fewer deaths after controlling for other factors. Lockdown stringency (as measured by the Oxford stringency index) is also strongly associated with fewer deaths for all models. Other significant factors for some models include population density, nursing home resident density, voting patterns shifting towards Donald Trump vs. prevous Republican candidates, and share of population under 18 years old. The models pass various robustness checks. The results are reproducible via an open-access data repository and Python notebook made available online.","PeriodicalId":278192,"journal":{"name":"MedRN: COVID-19 Research (Topic)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Few Variables Capture over 70% of State-Level Variance in U.S. COVID Deaths\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Sill\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3869984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A U.S. state-level analysis of factors associated with COVID-19 deaths reveals inequality (as defined by the Gini coefficient) to be far and away the strongest single-variable predictor, capturing 40% of vari ance in COVID deaths and 49% of variance in all-cause excess deaths since the start of the pandemic. A linear regression model with 5 independent variables accounts for over 70% of variation in COVID deaths,as does a 4-variable linear regression model for all-cause excess deaths. Similar models for COVID and all-cause excess deaths since October 1achieve similar results. Coefficients are highly significant (p <0.01) in almost all cases. A consistent finding across all 4 models is that a state’s relative humidity is strongly associated with fewer deaths after controlling for other factors. Lockdown stringency (as measured by the Oxford stringency index) is also strongly associated with fewer deaths for all models. Other significant factors for some models include population density, nursing home resident density, voting patterns shifting towards Donald Trump vs. prevous Republican candidates, and share of population under 18 years old. The models pass various robustness checks. The results are reproducible via an open-access data repository and Python notebook made available online.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedRN: COVID-19 Research (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedRN: COVID-19 Research (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3869984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedRN: COVID-19 Research (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3869984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国对COVID-19死亡相关因素的州一级分析显示,不平等(由基尼系数定义)无疑是最强的单变量预测因子,占COVID-19死亡方差的40%,占大流行开始以来全因超额死亡方差的49%。包含5个自变量的线性回归模型可以解释COVID - 19死亡人数变化的70%以上,包含4个变量的线性回归模型也可以解释全因超额死亡。针对COVID和自10月1日以来全因超额死亡的类似模型也取得了类似的结果。几乎所有病例的相关系数均极显著(p <0.01)。所有4个模型的一致发现是,在控制了其他因素后,一个州的相对湿度与更少的死亡人数密切相关。锁定严格度(以牛津严格度指数衡量)也与所有车型的死亡人数减少密切相关。一些模型的其他重要因素包括人口密度、养老院居民密度、投票模式向唐纳德·特朗普和前共和党候选人的转变,以及18岁以下人口的比例。这些模型通过了各种鲁棒性检查。结果可通过开放访问的数据存储库和在线提供的Python笔记本进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Few Variables Capture over 70% of State-Level Variance in U.S. COVID Deaths
A U.S. state-level analysis of factors associated with COVID-19 deaths reveals inequality (as defined by the Gini coefficient) to be far and away the strongest single-variable predictor, capturing 40% of vari ance in COVID deaths and 49% of variance in all-cause excess deaths since the start of the pandemic. A linear regression model with 5 independent variables accounts for over 70% of variation in COVID deaths,as does a 4-variable linear regression model for all-cause excess deaths. Similar models for COVID and all-cause excess deaths since October 1achieve similar results. Coefficients are highly significant (p <0.01) in almost all cases. A consistent finding across all 4 models is that a state’s relative humidity is strongly associated with fewer deaths after controlling for other factors. Lockdown stringency (as measured by the Oxford stringency index) is also strongly associated with fewer deaths for all models. Other significant factors for some models include population density, nursing home resident density, voting patterns shifting towards Donald Trump vs. prevous Republican candidates, and share of population under 18 years old. The models pass various robustness checks. The results are reproducible via an open-access data repository and Python notebook made available online.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信