基于两两比较的多准则决策问题求解

N. Krivulin, Temirlan Abildaev, Vladlena D. Gorshechnikova, D. Kapatsa, Elizaveta A. Magdich, Anastasia A. Mandrikova
{"title":"基于两两比较的多准则决策问题求解","authors":"N. Krivulin, Temirlan Abildaev, Vladlena D. Gorshechnikova, D. Kapatsa, Elizaveta A. Magdich, Anastasia A. Mandrikova","doi":"10.32603/2071-2340-2020-2-27-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems known in the literature are considered for evaluating ratings of alternatives based on pairwise comparisons. To solve the problems, three methods are used, including the traditional method of of analysis of hierarchies by T. Saaty and the method of weighted geometric means, as well as the new method of minimax log-Chebyshev approximation, for which the solution is obtained using the apparatus and methods of tropical (idempotent) mathematics. Comparison of the solutions obtained shows that the use of different methods does not always lead to the same or close results. If the results of different methods differ significantly the choice of one of them for making a decision does not seem entirely justified. On the contrary, the coincidence or similarity of these results can be considered as some additional argument in favor of choosing one of them as a solution close to the optimum.","PeriodicalId":319537,"journal":{"name":"Computer Tools in Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Solving Multicriteria Decision Making Problems Based on Pairwise Comparisons\",\"authors\":\"N. Krivulin, Temirlan Abildaev, Vladlena D. Gorshechnikova, D. Kapatsa, Elizaveta A. Magdich, Anastasia A. Mandrikova\",\"doi\":\"10.32603/2071-2340-2020-2-27-58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problems known in the literature are considered for evaluating ratings of alternatives based on pairwise comparisons. To solve the problems, three methods are used, including the traditional method of of analysis of hierarchies by T. Saaty and the method of weighted geometric means, as well as the new method of minimax log-Chebyshev approximation, for which the solution is obtained using the apparatus and methods of tropical (idempotent) mathematics. Comparison of the solutions obtained shows that the use of different methods does not always lead to the same or close results. If the results of different methods differ significantly the choice of one of them for making a decision does not seem entirely justified. On the contrary, the coincidence or similarity of these results can be considered as some additional argument in favor of choosing one of them as a solution close to the optimum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Tools in Education\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Tools in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32603/2071-2340-2020-2-27-58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2071-2340-2020-2-27-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献中已知的问题被认为是评估基于两两比较的选择评级。为了解决这些问题,采用了三种方法,包括传统的萨蒂层次分析法和加权几何均数法,以及利用热带(幂等)数学的仪器和方法求解的极大极小对数-切比雪夫逼近法。所得到的解的比较表明,使用不同的方法并不总是导致相同或接近的结果。如果不同方法的结果差别很大,那么选择其中一种方法来做决定似乎并不完全合理。相反,这些结果的巧合或相似性可以被认为是支持选择其中一个作为接近最优解的一些额外论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Solving Multicriteria Decision Making Problems Based on Pairwise Comparisons
Problems known in the literature are considered for evaluating ratings of alternatives based on pairwise comparisons. To solve the problems, three methods are used, including the traditional method of of analysis of hierarchies by T. Saaty and the method of weighted geometric means, as well as the new method of minimax log-Chebyshev approximation, for which the solution is obtained using the apparatus and methods of tropical (idempotent) mathematics. Comparison of the solutions obtained shows that the use of different methods does not always lead to the same or close results. If the results of different methods differ significantly the choice of one of them for making a decision does not seem entirely justified. On the contrary, the coincidence or similarity of these results can be considered as some additional argument in favor of choosing one of them as a solution close to the optimum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信