飞机接近:阿波罗ius, X-track和Well Clear Volume范例的综合

N. Fulton, Grace S. Garden, Sarah A. Mecklem, Brendan Williams, R. Clothier
{"title":"飞机接近:阿波罗ius, X-track和Well Clear Volume范例的综合","authors":"N. Fulton, Grace S. Garden, Sarah A. Mecklem, Brendan Williams, R. Clothier","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operating aerial vehicles in non-segregated airspace has sparked renewed interest into the problem of how to specify a Well-Clear Volume (WCV) for aircraft proximity. A pertinent example is the Self-Separation Volume (SSV) being developed by NASA for use in UAS Detect and Avoid (DAA) systems. To date, the generation and validation of candidate WCVs has been reliant on exhaustive simulation. Complementary research has been directed at the formalization of the Apollonius Circle paradigm in characterizing proximity for two aircraft. Recent research by Westcott, Fulton and Smith has cast the crossing-track problem in a Compromise Decision Support paradigm. In this paper the three approaches are synthesized into a single cohesive geometric model that is then used as an engineering validation tool to test the NASA SSV paradigm (a specific instance of a Well-Clear Volume). The geometric model for proximate operations is based on a Feasible Design Space that partitions into well identified geometric regions delineated by the Line of Sight (LOS) Circle and the Apollonius Circle. The LOS Circle provides insight as to the Geometric Dilution of Precision required in error analysis and also facilitates determination of the behavior of the distance at closest approach vector. The Apollonius Circle identifies, for a constant speed ratio, the locus of all possible collision points within the 2D conflict plane. The model developed in this paper facilitates a more robust geometric construction of the SSV with transparent testing and satisfaction of the operational requirements thus providing a consolidated benchmark reference for further engineering construction of WCVs.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aircraft Proximity: a synthesis of Apollonius, X-track, and Well Clear Volume paradigms\",\"authors\":\"N. Fulton, Grace S. Garden, Sarah A. Mecklem, Brendan Williams, R. Clothier\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The introduction of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operating aerial vehicles in non-segregated airspace has sparked renewed interest into the problem of how to specify a Well-Clear Volume (WCV) for aircraft proximity. A pertinent example is the Self-Separation Volume (SSV) being developed by NASA for use in UAS Detect and Avoid (DAA) systems. To date, the generation and validation of candidate WCVs has been reliant on exhaustive simulation. Complementary research has been directed at the formalization of the Apollonius Circle paradigm in characterizing proximity for two aircraft. Recent research by Westcott, Fulton and Smith has cast the crossing-track problem in a Compromise Decision Support paradigm. In this paper the three approaches are synthesized into a single cohesive geometric model that is then used as an engineering validation tool to test the NASA SSV paradigm (a specific instance of a Well-Clear Volume). The geometric model for proximate operations is based on a Feasible Design Space that partitions into well identified geometric regions delineated by the Line of Sight (LOS) Circle and the Apollonius Circle. The LOS Circle provides insight as to the Geometric Dilution of Precision required in error analysis and also facilitates determination of the behavior of the distance at closest approach vector. The Apollonius Circle identifies, for a constant speed ratio, the locus of all possible collision points within the 2D conflict plane. The model developed in this paper facilitates a more robust geometric construction of the SSV with transparent testing and satisfaction of the operational requirements thus providing a consolidated benchmark reference for further engineering construction of WCVs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

无人驾驶飞机系统(UAS)在非隔离空域操作飞行器的引入,引发了人们对如何为飞机接近指定良好清晰体积(WCV)问题的新兴趣。一个相关的例子是美国国家航空航天局(NASA)正在开发的用于无人机探测和避免(DAA)系统的自分离体积(SSV)。迄今为止,候选wcv的生成和验证一直依赖于详尽的模拟。补充研究已针对阿波罗圈范式的形式化,以表征两架飞机的接近性。韦斯科特、富尔顿和史密斯最近的研究将交叉轨道问题置于妥协决策支持范式中。在本文中,这三种方法被综合成一个单一的有凝聚力的几何模型,然后用作工程验证工具来测试NASA SSV范式(Well-Clear Volume的具体实例)。近距操作的几何模型基于可行设计空间,该空间划分为由视线(LOS)圈和阿波罗尼乌斯圈划定的良好识别的几何区域。LOS圆提供了关于误差分析所需的几何精度稀释的见解,也有助于确定最接近矢量的距离行为。在恒定的速比下,阿波罗尼乌斯圆确定了二维冲突平面内所有可能的碰撞点的轨迹。本文开发的模型有助于SSV的更稳健的几何结构,具有透明的测试和满足操作要求,从而为wcv的进一步工程建设提供了统一的基准参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aircraft Proximity: a synthesis of Apollonius, X-track, and Well Clear Volume paradigms
The introduction of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operating aerial vehicles in non-segregated airspace has sparked renewed interest into the problem of how to specify a Well-Clear Volume (WCV) for aircraft proximity. A pertinent example is the Self-Separation Volume (SSV) being developed by NASA for use in UAS Detect and Avoid (DAA) systems. To date, the generation and validation of candidate WCVs has been reliant on exhaustive simulation. Complementary research has been directed at the formalization of the Apollonius Circle paradigm in characterizing proximity for two aircraft. Recent research by Westcott, Fulton and Smith has cast the crossing-track problem in a Compromise Decision Support paradigm. In this paper the three approaches are synthesized into a single cohesive geometric model that is then used as an engineering validation tool to test the NASA SSV paradigm (a specific instance of a Well-Clear Volume). The geometric model for proximate operations is based on a Feasible Design Space that partitions into well identified geometric regions delineated by the Line of Sight (LOS) Circle and the Apollonius Circle. The LOS Circle provides insight as to the Geometric Dilution of Precision required in error analysis and also facilitates determination of the behavior of the distance at closest approach vector. The Apollonius Circle identifies, for a constant speed ratio, the locus of all possible collision points within the 2D conflict plane. The model developed in this paper facilitates a more robust geometric construction of the SSV with transparent testing and satisfaction of the operational requirements thus providing a consolidated benchmark reference for further engineering construction of WCVs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信