ESG投资的盈利能力和风险分析:以疫情前后为重点

E. Ryu, Sang Won Lee
{"title":"ESG投资的盈利能力和风险分析:以疫情前后为重点","authors":"E. Ryu, Sang Won Lee","doi":"10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the correlation between the Social Responsibility Index and KOSPI200 to confirm the usefulness(profit and risk) of socially responsible investment. The results are as follows. The trends between the social responsibility index and the KOSPI200 are very similar and highly correlated. In addition, the average return of the social responsibility index is lower than that of the KOSPI200, the standard deviation is larger, and the gap between them in the post-COVID-19 period is larger than in the previous period. granger causal analysis showed that the social responsibility index and KOSPI200 have strong antecedents in both directions, and this phenomenon is more evident in the post-COVID-19 period. Based on these results, the differentiation and usefulness of the social responsibility index in Korea is currently low and the usefulness is declining, but it is expected that the interest and impact on it will increase in the future. Therefore, it is considered that it will be of utmost importance to show differentiation by clarifying the selection criteria of the sports incorporated in the social responsibility index.","PeriodicalId":395795,"journal":{"name":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profitability and Risk Analysis of ESG Investments: Focusing on before and after COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"E. Ryu, Sang Won Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzed the correlation between the Social Responsibility Index and KOSPI200 to confirm the usefulness(profit and risk) of socially responsible investment. The results are as follows. The trends between the social responsibility index and the KOSPI200 are very similar and highly correlated. In addition, the average return of the social responsibility index is lower than that of the KOSPI200, the standard deviation is larger, and the gap between them in the post-COVID-19 period is larger than in the previous period. granger causal analysis showed that the social responsibility index and KOSPI200 have strong antecedents in both directions, and this phenomenon is more evident in the post-COVID-19 period. Based on these results, the differentiation and usefulness of the social responsibility index in Korea is currently low and the usefulness is declining, but it is expected that the interest and impact on it will increase in the future. Therefore, it is considered that it will be of utmost importance to show differentiation by clarifying the selection criteria of the sports incorporated in the social responsibility index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析社会责任指数与KOSPI200的相关关系,以确认社会责任投资的有用性(利润与风险)。结果如下:社会责任指数和KOSPI200指数的趋势非常相似,而且相关性很高。此外,社会责任指数的平均收益率低于KOSPI200指数,标准差较大,后疫情时期两者之间的差距大于前一时期。格兰杰因果分析表明,社会责任指数与KOSPI200指数在两个方向上都存在较强的前因变量,且这种现象在后疫情时期更为明显。据此,目前韩国社会责任指数的差异性和实用性较低,实用性正在下降,但预计今后对其的关注和影响将会增加。因此,明确社会责任指数中纳入的体育项目的选择标准,表现出差异性是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profitability and Risk Analysis of ESG Investments: Focusing on before and after COVID-19
This study analyzed the correlation between the Social Responsibility Index and KOSPI200 to confirm the usefulness(profit and risk) of socially responsible investment. The results are as follows. The trends between the social responsibility index and the KOSPI200 are very similar and highly correlated. In addition, the average return of the social responsibility index is lower than that of the KOSPI200, the standard deviation is larger, and the gap between them in the post-COVID-19 period is larger than in the previous period. granger causal analysis showed that the social responsibility index and KOSPI200 have strong antecedents in both directions, and this phenomenon is more evident in the post-COVID-19 period. Based on these results, the differentiation and usefulness of the social responsibility index in Korea is currently low and the usefulness is declining, but it is expected that the interest and impact on it will increase in the future. Therefore, it is considered that it will be of utmost importance to show differentiation by clarifying the selection criteria of the sports incorporated in the social responsibility index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信