M. Aydin, T. Atmaca, A. Zaim, O. C. Turna, V. Nguyen
{"title":"OBS预约协议的性能研究","authors":"M. Aydin, T. Atmaca, A. Zaim, O. C. Turna, V. Nguyen","doi":"10.1109/AICT.2008.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison of reservation protocols used in optical burst switches (OBS) with quality of service (QoS). In terms of performance criteria, byte loss rate, end-to-end delay and access delay are considered. A 2-state MMPP(Markov modulated Poisson process) traffic generator on a 14-node mesh network topology illustrating NSFNET is chosen as the testbed. This topology is simulated using NS2 network simulation platform. Bursts are created using a hybrid model that takes into account both timeout and maximum length methods. In edge and core nodes, there are different QoS mechanisms such as explicit tear down and priority based queuing. Simulation results have shown that JIT (just in time) algorithm is not as successful as JET (just enough time) and horizon when the network is highly loaded. However, JET algorithm produces better performance than other reservation protocols while considering QoS.","PeriodicalId":105735,"journal":{"name":"2008 Fourth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Study of OBS Reservation Protocols\",\"authors\":\"M. Aydin, T. Atmaca, A. Zaim, O. C. Turna, V. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AICT.2008.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparison of reservation protocols used in optical burst switches (OBS) with quality of service (QoS). In terms of performance criteria, byte loss rate, end-to-end delay and access delay are considered. A 2-state MMPP(Markov modulated Poisson process) traffic generator on a 14-node mesh network topology illustrating NSFNET is chosen as the testbed. This topology is simulated using NS2 network simulation platform. Bursts are created using a hybrid model that takes into account both timeout and maximum length methods. In edge and core nodes, there are different QoS mechanisms such as explicit tear down and priority based queuing. Simulation results have shown that JIT (just in time) algorithm is not as successful as JET (just enough time) and horizon when the network is highly loaded. However, JET algorithm produces better performance than other reservation protocols while considering QoS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Fourth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Fourth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT.2008.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Fourth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT.2008.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
本文对用于光突发交换机(OBS)的保留协议与服务质量(QoS)进行了比较。在性能标准方面,考虑了字节丢失率、端到端延迟和访问延迟。在NSFNET的14节点网状网络拓扑结构上,选择一个2状态MMPP(Markov调制泊松过程)流量发生器作为测试平台。采用NS2网络仿真平台对该拓扑进行仿真。使用混合模型创建突发,该模型同时考虑了超时和最大长度方法。在边缘和核心节点中,存在不同的QoS机制,例如显式拆除和基于优先级的排队。仿真结果表明,在网络高负载情况下,JIT (just in time)算法不如JET (just enough time)和horizon算法成功。然而,在考虑QoS的情况下,JET算法比其他保留协议产生更好的性能。
This paper presents a comparison of reservation protocols used in optical burst switches (OBS) with quality of service (QoS). In terms of performance criteria, byte loss rate, end-to-end delay and access delay are considered. A 2-state MMPP(Markov modulated Poisson process) traffic generator on a 14-node mesh network topology illustrating NSFNET is chosen as the testbed. This topology is simulated using NS2 network simulation platform. Bursts are created using a hybrid model that takes into account both timeout and maximum length methods. In edge and core nodes, there are different QoS mechanisms such as explicit tear down and priority based queuing. Simulation results have shown that JIT (just in time) algorithm is not as successful as JET (just enough time) and horizon when the network is highly loaded. However, JET algorithm produces better performance than other reservation protocols while considering QoS.