没有新自由主义者的紧缩:重新评价一个强大国家技术的曲折历史

Cristian Capotescu, O. Sanchez-Sibony, M. Teixeira
{"title":"没有新自由主义者的紧缩:重新评价一个强大国家技术的曲折历史","authors":"Cristian Capotescu, O. Sanchez-Sibony, M. Teixeira","doi":"10.1353/cap.2022.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Since the 1980s, austerity has become synonymous with neoliberal “free” markets and the retreat of the state. With case studies from early Stalinist Russia, interwar corporatist Portugal, and late socialist Romania, we offer an alternative historical geography of austerity in the twentieth century. Significantly, we argue that austerity was not a corollary of neoliberalism but fulfilled the crucial functions of state-building, state transformation, and state maintenance in systems falling outside the liberal framework. The regimes under study resorted to austerity to drive deep structural change, expand state capacity, and pursue utopian promises of future-oriented progress and national independence. Focusing on places on the margins of the global capitalist economy, we uncover often-overlooked tool kits—both theoretical and technical—that state officials used to implement austerity. Collectively, we show how austerity is, at its core, a technology of the state and a mode of governance, widely adopted across political ideologies and economic systems in the past century.","PeriodicalId":243846,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Austerity without Neoliberals: Reappraising the Sinuous History of a Powerful State Technology\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Capotescu, O. Sanchez-Sibony, M. Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cap.2022.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Since the 1980s, austerity has become synonymous with neoliberal “free” markets and the retreat of the state. With case studies from early Stalinist Russia, interwar corporatist Portugal, and late socialist Romania, we offer an alternative historical geography of austerity in the twentieth century. Significantly, we argue that austerity was not a corollary of neoliberalism but fulfilled the crucial functions of state-building, state transformation, and state maintenance in systems falling outside the liberal framework. The regimes under study resorted to austerity to drive deep structural change, expand state capacity, and pursue utopian promises of future-oriented progress and national independence. Focusing on places on the margins of the global capitalist economy, we uncover often-overlooked tool kits—both theoretical and technical—that state officials used to implement austerity. Collectively, we show how austerity is, at its core, a technology of the state and a mode of governance, widely adopted across political ideologies and economic systems in the past century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2022.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2022.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:自20世纪80年代以来,紧缩已成为新自由主义“自由”市场和国家撤退的代名词。通过对早期斯大林主义的俄罗斯、两次世界大战之间社团主义的葡萄牙和晚期社会主义的罗马尼亚的案例研究,我们提供了20世纪紧缩政策的另一种历史地理。值得注意的是,我们认为紧缩不是新自由主义的必然结果,而是在自由主义框架之外的制度中履行国家建设、国家转型和国家维护的关键功能。我们所研究的这些政权采用紧缩政策来推动深层次的结构变革,扩大国家能力,并追求面向未来的进步和民族独立的乌托邦承诺。聚焦于全球资本主义经济边缘的地方,我们发现了经常被忽视的工具包——理论的和技术的——国家官员用来实施紧缩政策。总的来说,我们展示了紧缩在其核心上是一种国家技术和治理模式,在过去的一个世纪里,在各种政治意识形态和经济体系中被广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Austerity without Neoliberals: Reappraising the Sinuous History of a Powerful State Technology
Abstract:Since the 1980s, austerity has become synonymous with neoliberal “free” markets and the retreat of the state. With case studies from early Stalinist Russia, interwar corporatist Portugal, and late socialist Romania, we offer an alternative historical geography of austerity in the twentieth century. Significantly, we argue that austerity was not a corollary of neoliberalism but fulfilled the crucial functions of state-building, state transformation, and state maintenance in systems falling outside the liberal framework. The regimes under study resorted to austerity to drive deep structural change, expand state capacity, and pursue utopian promises of future-oriented progress and national independence. Focusing on places on the margins of the global capitalist economy, we uncover often-overlooked tool kits—both theoretical and technical—that state officials used to implement austerity. Collectively, we show how austerity is, at its core, a technology of the state and a mode of governance, widely adopted across political ideologies and economic systems in the past century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信