Robert Botez, Vlad Strautiu, I. Ivanciu, V. Dobrota
{"title":"物联网设备的容器化应用:balenecloud和Amazon Web Services方法的比较","authors":"Robert Botez, Vlad Strautiu, I. Ivanciu, V. Dobrota","doi":"10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depending on the requirements, the deployment of containerized applications for monitoring Internet of Things devices can be done in Cloud or on the Edge. This paper discusses the design of a containerized application monitoring temperature and humidity for IoT devices in three implementations: (1) balenaCloud for edge deployment; (2) Amazon Web Services cloud with EC2 instances; and (3) dedicated Amazon Web Services IoT service. The experiments showed that there are no significant performance differences between Edge and Cloud deployments regarding the resource consumption. However, for fast and almost effortless action, Amazon Web Services IoT is the go-to option when it comes to serverless applications based on Message Queuing Telemetry Transport. For all-in-one automated fleet management balenaCloud seems to be a good tool for IoT developers.","PeriodicalId":165650,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Containerized Application for IoT Devices: Comparison between balenaCloud and Amazon Web Services Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Robert Botez, Vlad Strautiu, I. Ivanciu, V. Dobrota\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Depending on the requirements, the deployment of containerized applications for monitoring Internet of Things devices can be done in Cloud or on the Edge. This paper discusses the design of a containerized application monitoring temperature and humidity for IoT devices in three implementations: (1) balenaCloud for edge deployment; (2) Amazon Web Services cloud with EC2 instances; and (3) dedicated Amazon Web Services IoT service. The experiments showed that there are no significant performance differences between Edge and Cloud deployments regarding the resource consumption. However, for fast and almost effortless action, Amazon Web Services IoT is the go-to option when it comes to serverless applications based on Message Queuing Telemetry Transport. For all-in-one automated fleet management balenaCloud seems to be a good tool for IoT developers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
根据需求，监控物联网设备的容器化应用程序的部署可以在云中或边缘上完成。本文讨论了一种容器化应用程序的设计，该应用程序在三种实现中监测物联网设备的温度和湿度:(1)边缘部署的balenicloud;(2)带有EC2实例的Amazon Web Services云;(3)专用的Amazon Web Services IoT服务。实验表明，在资源消耗方面，边缘部署和云部署之间没有显着的性能差异。然而，对于快速且几乎毫不费力的操作，当涉及到基于消息队列遥测传输的无服务器应用程序时，亚马逊网络服务物联网是首选。对于一体化自动化车队管理来说，balenicloud似乎是物联网开发人员的好工具。
Containerized Application for IoT Devices: Comparison between balenaCloud and Amazon Web Services Approaches
Depending on the requirements, the deployment of containerized applications for monitoring Internet of Things devices can be done in Cloud or on the Edge. This paper discusses the design of a containerized application monitoring temperature and humidity for IoT devices in three implementations: (1) balenaCloud for edge deployment; (2) Amazon Web Services cloud with EC2 instances; and (3) dedicated Amazon Web Services IoT service. The experiments showed that there are no significant performance differences between Edge and Cloud deployments regarding the resource consumption. However, for fast and almost effortless action, Amazon Web Services IoT is the go-to option when it comes to serverless applications based on Message Queuing Telemetry Transport. For all-in-one automated fleet management balenaCloud seems to be a good tool for IoT developers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
