智利中学教师包容性自我认同量表的验证

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fancy Castro-Rubilar, María Teresa Castañeda-Díaz, Carlos Ossa-Cornejo, Enrique Blanco-Hadi, Nancy Castillo-Valenzuela
{"title":"智利中学教师包容性自我认同量表的验证","authors":"Fancy Castro-Rubilar,&nbsp;María Teresa Castañeda-Díaz,&nbsp;Carlos Ossa-Cornejo,&nbsp;Enrique Blanco-Hadi,&nbsp;Nancy Castillo-Valenzuela","doi":"10.1016/j.pse.2017.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to analyze the internal structure and reliability of an instrument designed to measure the acceptance of and willingness for school inclusion, which has been conceptualized as inclusive self-ascription. The methodology includes an instrumental design, with a representative, random sample of secondary school teachers in the province of Ñuble, Chile. The number of participants was 548 teachers, male and female, aged between 28 and 60. The instrument used was an adaptation of the Index for Inclusion created by Booth and Ainscow. The results show six factors: teaching for learning for all, building an inclusive community, curricular design for diversity, school policies for diversity, inclusive practices in schools, and development of a culture for inclusion. These dimensions were clustered into three new factors, namely, pedagogical practices, inclusive cultures, and inclusive policies. The level of reliability of the instrument was high (α = .954)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45361,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia Educativa","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pse.2017.05.003","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validación de la escala de autoadscripción inclusiva en docentes secundarios de Chile\",\"authors\":\"Fancy Castro-Rubilar,&nbsp;María Teresa Castañeda-Díaz,&nbsp;Carlos Ossa-Cornejo,&nbsp;Enrique Blanco-Hadi,&nbsp;Nancy Castillo-Valenzuela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pse.2017.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to analyze the internal structure and reliability of an instrument designed to measure the acceptance of and willingness for school inclusion, which has been conceptualized as inclusive self-ascription. The methodology includes an instrumental design, with a representative, random sample of secondary school teachers in the province of Ñuble, Chile. The number of participants was 548 teachers, male and female, aged between 28 and 60. The instrument used was an adaptation of the Index for Inclusion created by Booth and Ainscow. The results show six factors: teaching for learning for all, building an inclusive community, curricular design for diversity, school policies for diversity, inclusive practices in schools, and development of a culture for inclusion. These dimensions were clustered into three new factors, namely, pedagogical practices, inclusive cultures, and inclusive policies. The level of reliability of the instrument was high (α = .954)</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia Educativa\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 105-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pse.2017.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia Educativa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1135755X17300209\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1135755X17300209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究旨在分析一种测量学校包容性接受度和意愿的工具的内部结构和可靠性,该工具被概念化为包容性自我归属。该方法包括一项工具设计,对智利Ñuble省的中学教师进行了有代表性的随机抽样。参与调查的教师共有548人,男女均有,年龄在28岁至60岁之间。使用的工具是对Booth和Ainscow创建的包容性指数(Index for Inclusion)的改编。结果显示了六个因素:为全民学习而教学、建立包容性社区、面向多样性的课程设计、面向多样性的学校政策、学校的包容性实践以及包容性文化的发展。这些维度被归纳为三个新的因素,即教学实践、包容性文化和包容性政策。仪器的可靠性水平较高(α = .954)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validación de la escala de autoadscripción inclusiva en docentes secundarios de Chile

This study aimed to analyze the internal structure and reliability of an instrument designed to measure the acceptance of and willingness for school inclusion, which has been conceptualized as inclusive self-ascription. The methodology includes an instrumental design, with a representative, random sample of secondary school teachers in the province of Ñuble, Chile. The number of participants was 548 teachers, male and female, aged between 28 and 60. The instrument used was an adaptation of the Index for Inclusion created by Booth and Ainscow. The results show six factors: teaching for learning for all, building an inclusive community, curricular design for diversity, school policies for diversity, inclusive practices in schools, and development of a culture for inclusion. These dimensions were clustered into three new factors, namely, pedagogical practices, inclusive cultures, and inclusive policies. The level of reliability of the instrument was high (α = .954)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Psicología Educativa es una revista científico-profesional española, de carácter multidisciplinar, que promueve tanto la aportación teórica como la investigación experimental y profesional del psicólogo y profesiones afines en el ámbito educativo. Su objetivo es compartir temas de común interés en procesos cognitivos, afectivos y culturales en la adquisición de conocimiento, como en áreas de intervención e innovación educativa. Por ello invita a investigadores relacionados con el ámbito educativo (psicólogos, antropólogos, sociólogos, tecnólogos educativos, TCs) a educadores y orientadores en diversos ámbitos, a psicólogos educativos, a evaluadores, a técnicos de computación y tecnologías de la información aplicadas a la educación a enviar sus trabajos a esta revista. Psicología Educativa acepta manuscritos inéditos y originales de interés para los psicólogos y que sean una contribución al conocimiento correspondiente al ámbito de la Psicología de la Educación. Psicología Educativa publica principalmente en castellano, pero admite contribuciones originales en inglés. Revista Psicología Educativa publica principalmente en castellano, pero admite igualmente contribuciones originales en inglés. La revista admite originales libres y también puede solicitar trabajos específicos a autores relevantes. Los manuscritos originales recibidos en castellano o inglés serán sometidos al proceso de revisión externa por expertos, anónima por pares doble ciego (Peer Review). En función de las valoraciones de los expertos, el equipo directivo de la revista tomará la decisión sobre los artículos que podrán ser aceptados, rechazados o solicitadas modificaciones para la mejora de los mismos y la aceptación o rechazo definitivos. Los autores que envían su trabajo a la revista, nunca lo deben postular simultáneamente a otras publicaciones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信