SRM中解决工具的相关性

Jens-Hinrich Binder
{"title":"SRM中解决工具的相关性","authors":"Jens-Hinrich Binder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3274520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In addition to, and complementing the, new regime on recovery and resolution planning, the introduction of a harmonised, in part innovative set of new resolution tools and corresponding powers for the resolution of systemically important banking institutions with the BRRD and the SRMR was intended, and expected by many observers, to be no less than a game changing event. For most EU Member States, the BRRD has triggered relevant legislation for the first time ever, while for some (including, in particular, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark), the new framework followed up on similar innovations in earlier domestic legislation. Within the Eurozone, the creation of the Single Resolution Mechanism has complemented the substantive and procedural rules established by the BRRD with an institutionalised framework for central-ised decision-making as well as national execution and implementation of supra-national resolu-tion decisions. To a considerable extent, the SRMR even substitutes national legislation transpos-ing the BRRD, thus facilitating even further harmonisation of applicable laws, but also necessi-tating a rather complex interplay of directly applicable EU law and national legislation. This pa-per assesses the relevance of the resolution tools provided by the BRRD and the SRMR (sale of business, bridge institution, asset separation, and bail-in) in the light of the first cases decided under the auspices of the Single Resolution Board (SRB). Specifically, three dimensions are ex-plored: First, taking into account both the historic roots of each resolution tool and the recent case law, the paper assesses potential scenarios and preconditions for successful, effective im-plementation. Second, and related to the foregoing, the examines operational issues pertaining to the implementation of the resolution toolbox. Thirdly, and in the light of the aspects discussed before, the paper examines the suitability of the new resolution tools for application in extraor-dinary cases of macro-economic distress, where adverse market conditions and mounting non-performing loans affect large numbers of credit institutions at the same time.","PeriodicalId":383457,"journal":{"name":"European Banking Institute (EBI) Research Paper Series","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relevance of the Resolution Tools Within the SRM\",\"authors\":\"Jens-Hinrich Binder\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3274520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In addition to, and complementing the, new regime on recovery and resolution planning, the introduction of a harmonised, in part innovative set of new resolution tools and corresponding powers for the resolution of systemically important banking institutions with the BRRD and the SRMR was intended, and expected by many observers, to be no less than a game changing event. For most EU Member States, the BRRD has triggered relevant legislation for the first time ever, while for some (including, in particular, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark), the new framework followed up on similar innovations in earlier domestic legislation. Within the Eurozone, the creation of the Single Resolution Mechanism has complemented the substantive and procedural rules established by the BRRD with an institutionalised framework for central-ised decision-making as well as national execution and implementation of supra-national resolu-tion decisions. To a considerable extent, the SRMR even substitutes national legislation transpos-ing the BRRD, thus facilitating even further harmonisation of applicable laws, but also necessi-tating a rather complex interplay of directly applicable EU law and national legislation. This pa-per assesses the relevance of the resolution tools provided by the BRRD and the SRMR (sale of business, bridge institution, asset separation, and bail-in) in the light of the first cases decided under the auspices of the Single Resolution Board (SRB). Specifically, three dimensions are ex-plored: First, taking into account both the historic roots of each resolution tool and the recent case law, the paper assesses potential scenarios and preconditions for successful, effective im-plementation. Second, and related to the foregoing, the examines operational issues pertaining to the implementation of the resolution toolbox. Thirdly, and in the light of the aspects discussed before, the paper examines the suitability of the new resolution tools for application in extraor-dinary cases of macro-economic distress, where adverse market conditions and mounting non-performing loans affect large numbers of credit institutions at the same time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Banking Institute (EBI) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Banking Institute (EBI) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Banking Institute (EBI) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

除了和补充有关恢复和处置计划的新制度之外,引入一套统一的、在一定程度上具有创新性的新处置工具,以及与BRRD和SRMR一起处置具有系统重要性的银行机构的相应权力,是许多观察人士的初衷,也是他们的预期,这不亚于一场改变游戏规则的事件。对于大多数欧盟成员国来说,BRRD是有史以来第一次触发相关立法,而对于一些国家(特别是英国、德国和丹麦)来说,新框架是在早期国内立法中类似创新的后续。在欧元区内部,单一决议机制的建立补充了BRRD建立的实质性和程序性规则,为集中决策以及国家执行和实施超国家决议决定提供了制度化框架。在相当大的程度上,SRMR甚至取代了取代BRRD的国家立法,从而促进了适用法律的进一步协调,但也需要直接适用的欧盟法律和国家立法之间相当复杂的相互作用。本文根据在单一决议委员会(SRB)主持下决定的首批案件,评估了BRRD和SRMR提供的决议工具(出售业务、过桥机构、资产分离和内部纾困)的相关性。具体而言,本文探讨了三个维度:首先,考虑到每个解决工具的历史根源和最近的判例法,本文评估了成功有效实施的潜在情景和先决条件。其次,与上述内容相关的是,本文将研究与解决工具箱的实现相关的操作问题。第三,根据前面讨论的方面,本文考察了新的解决工具在宏观经济困境的特殊情况下的适用性,在这种情况下,不利的市场条件和不断增加的不良贷款同时影响到大量的信贷机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relevance of the Resolution Tools Within the SRM
In addition to, and complementing the, new regime on recovery and resolution planning, the introduction of a harmonised, in part innovative set of new resolution tools and corresponding powers for the resolution of systemically important banking institutions with the BRRD and the SRMR was intended, and expected by many observers, to be no less than a game changing event. For most EU Member States, the BRRD has triggered relevant legislation for the first time ever, while for some (including, in particular, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark), the new framework followed up on similar innovations in earlier domestic legislation. Within the Eurozone, the creation of the Single Resolution Mechanism has complemented the substantive and procedural rules established by the BRRD with an institutionalised framework for central-ised decision-making as well as national execution and implementation of supra-national resolu-tion decisions. To a considerable extent, the SRMR even substitutes national legislation transpos-ing the BRRD, thus facilitating even further harmonisation of applicable laws, but also necessi-tating a rather complex interplay of directly applicable EU law and national legislation. This pa-per assesses the relevance of the resolution tools provided by the BRRD and the SRMR (sale of business, bridge institution, asset separation, and bail-in) in the light of the first cases decided under the auspices of the Single Resolution Board (SRB). Specifically, three dimensions are ex-plored: First, taking into account both the historic roots of each resolution tool and the recent case law, the paper assesses potential scenarios and preconditions for successful, effective im-plementation. Second, and related to the foregoing, the examines operational issues pertaining to the implementation of the resolution toolbox. Thirdly, and in the light of the aspects discussed before, the paper examines the suitability of the new resolution tools for application in extraor-dinary cases of macro-economic distress, where adverse market conditions and mounting non-performing loans affect large numbers of credit institutions at the same time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信