框架、格式塔与图像:分类的等价性还是连续性?

Zhiqiang Wang, P. Dashinimaeva
{"title":"框架、格式塔与图像:分类的等价性还是连续性?","authors":"Zhiqiang Wang, P. Dashinimaeva","doi":"10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-29-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study deals with making a distinction between the terms “concept” and “notion”, on the one hand, “frame”, “gestalt” and “image”, on the other. The survey shows that the researchers are not unanimous in their opinion regarding both the typology of cognitive structures and their content. Relevant classifications indicate clearly that frame, gestalt and image are most regular categories, so, understanding their content, apart from their relationship to each other with-in the framework of modern linguistics, is of particular interest to us. In the study, these concepts are considered in the following ways: a relevant scientific source survey, term definitions, key features, illustrations, and comparative research to distinguish between the equivalence, proximity, and contiguity degrees of the characteristics revealed. Based on such a systemic analysis, it has been found that gestalt, image and frame are categories of the external world conceptualization distinguished on the basis of their structural, functional and semantic features. As a result, it concludes, the categories “frame”, “gestalt” and “image” might be considered as contiguous concepts.","PeriodicalId":434662,"journal":{"name":"NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frame, Gestalt and Image: Equivalence or Contiguity of Categorization?\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqiang Wang, P. Dashinimaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-29-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study deals with making a distinction between the terms “concept” and “notion”, on the one hand, “frame”, “gestalt” and “image”, on the other. The survey shows that the researchers are not unanimous in their opinion regarding both the typology of cognitive structures and their content. Relevant classifications indicate clearly that frame, gestalt and image are most regular categories, so, understanding their content, apart from their relationship to each other with-in the framework of modern linguistics, is of particular interest to us. In the study, these concepts are considered in the following ways: a relevant scientific source survey, term definitions, key features, illustrations, and comparative research to distinguish between the equivalence, proximity, and contiguity degrees of the characteristics revealed. Based on such a systemic analysis, it has been found that gestalt, image and frame are categories of the external world conceptualization distinguished on the basis of their structural, functional and semantic features. As a result, it concludes, the categories “frame”, “gestalt” and “image” might be considered as contiguous concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-29-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-29-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究探讨了“概念”和“概念”的区别,以及“框架”、“格式塔”和“形象”的区别。调查显示,研究者对认知结构的类型及其内容的看法并不一致。相关的分类清楚地表明,框架、格式塔和图像是最规则的类别,因此,除了它们在现代语言学框架内的相互关系外,了解它们的内容对我们来说特别有趣。在研究中,这些概念通过以下方式进行考虑:相关的科学来源调查,术语定义,关键特征,插图和比较研究,以区分所揭示的特征的等效性,接近性和接近程度。在此系统分析的基础上,我们发现格式塔、图像和框架是根据它们的结构、功能和语义特征来区分的外部世界概念化的范畴。因此,它得出结论,范畴“框架”,“格式塔”和“图像”可能被认为是连续的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frame, Gestalt and Image: Equivalence or Contiguity of Categorization?
The study deals with making a distinction between the terms “concept” and “notion”, on the one hand, “frame”, “gestalt” and “image”, on the other. The survey shows that the researchers are not unanimous in their opinion regarding both the typology of cognitive structures and their content. Relevant classifications indicate clearly that frame, gestalt and image are most regular categories, so, understanding their content, apart from their relationship to each other with-in the framework of modern linguistics, is of particular interest to us. In the study, these concepts are considered in the following ways: a relevant scientific source survey, term definitions, key features, illustrations, and comparative research to distinguish between the equivalence, proximity, and contiguity degrees of the characteristics revealed. Based on such a systemic analysis, it has been found that gestalt, image and frame are categories of the external world conceptualization distinguished on the basis of their structural, functional and semantic features. As a result, it concludes, the categories “frame”, “gestalt” and “image” might be considered as contiguous concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信