数字化传统学习材料:生产阶段

Stella Stefany, R. Purbojo
{"title":"数字化传统学习材料:生产阶段","authors":"Stella Stefany, R. Purbojo","doi":"10.4108/EAI.16-10-2019.2304346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitalization of Education field has been highlighted as main initiative to improve the quality of human capital as part of national roadmap program \"Making Indonesia 4.0\" (interpreted as industry 4.0) which has been officially launched on April 2018. Education Ministry launched the national online learning system as initiative to provide wider access of education. As new method of learning, it requires an innovative strategy to transform the system. One of the most major things is to produce high-quality online course module as substitution of face-to-face (FtF) learning method. This research is aimed to identify and analyze the conversion steps of learning materials and compare the learning outcomes. Digital content in this study refers to online course module for higher education. FGD was conducted with 10 participants to evaluate design and development process of digitizing conventional materials. During January and April 2019, 97 students were involved in this research, they are equally assigned to two types of learning modes; fully online and onsite classroom in which taught by the same lecturer with same learning objectives, assessment materials, and assignments. The finding is there were no significant differences among the student learning outcomes of on-site and distance learning modes. We concluded that the strategy and process of converting regular course module into the digital course one has no effect on the learning outcomes in both blended learning and distance learning strategy.","PeriodicalId":294098,"journal":{"name":"Procedings of the 1st ICA Regional Conference, ICA 2019, October 16-17 2019, Bali, Indonesia","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitizing Conventional Learning Materials: Production Phase\",\"authors\":\"Stella Stefany, R. Purbojo\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/EAI.16-10-2019.2304346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitalization of Education field has been highlighted as main initiative to improve the quality of human capital as part of national roadmap program \\\"Making Indonesia 4.0\\\" (interpreted as industry 4.0) which has been officially launched on April 2018. Education Ministry launched the national online learning system as initiative to provide wider access of education. As new method of learning, it requires an innovative strategy to transform the system. One of the most major things is to produce high-quality online course module as substitution of face-to-face (FtF) learning method. This research is aimed to identify and analyze the conversion steps of learning materials and compare the learning outcomes. Digital content in this study refers to online course module for higher education. FGD was conducted with 10 participants to evaluate design and development process of digitizing conventional materials. During January and April 2019, 97 students were involved in this research, they are equally assigned to two types of learning modes; fully online and onsite classroom in which taught by the same lecturer with same learning objectives, assessment materials, and assignments. The finding is there were no significant differences among the student learning outcomes of on-site and distance learning modes. We concluded that the strategy and process of converting regular course module into the digital course one has no effect on the learning outcomes in both blended learning and distance learning strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedings of the 1st ICA Regional Conference, ICA 2019, October 16-17 2019, Bali, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"272 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedings of the 1st ICA Regional Conference, ICA 2019, October 16-17 2019, Bali, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.16-10-2019.2304346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedings of the 1st ICA Regional Conference, ICA 2019, October 16-17 2019, Bali, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.16-10-2019.2304346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教育领域的数字化已被强调为提高人力资本质量的主要举措,作为2018年4月正式启动的国家路线图计划“制造印度尼西亚4.0”(解释为工业4.0)的一部分。教育部启动了全国在线学习系统,以提供更广泛的教育机会。作为一种新的学习方法,它需要一种创新的策略来实现系统的转型。其中最重要的是制作高质量的网络课程模块来替代面对面的学习方式。本研究旨在识别和分析学习资料的转换步骤,并比较学习结果。本研究中的数字内容是指高等教育在线课程模块。共有10名参与者参与FGD,以评估传统材料数字化的设计和开发过程。在2019年1月至4月期间,97名学生参与了这项研究,他们被平均分配到两种学习模式;完全在线和现场课堂,由同一讲师以相同的学习目标,评估材料和作业授课。研究发现,学生在现场和远程学习模式下的学习效果没有显著差异。我们的结论是,在混合学习和远程学习策略中,将常规课程模块转换为数字课程模块的策略和过程对学习结果没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digitizing Conventional Learning Materials: Production Phase
Digitalization of Education field has been highlighted as main initiative to improve the quality of human capital as part of national roadmap program "Making Indonesia 4.0" (interpreted as industry 4.0) which has been officially launched on April 2018. Education Ministry launched the national online learning system as initiative to provide wider access of education. As new method of learning, it requires an innovative strategy to transform the system. One of the most major things is to produce high-quality online course module as substitution of face-to-face (FtF) learning method. This research is aimed to identify and analyze the conversion steps of learning materials and compare the learning outcomes. Digital content in this study refers to online course module for higher education. FGD was conducted with 10 participants to evaluate design and development process of digitizing conventional materials. During January and April 2019, 97 students were involved in this research, they are equally assigned to two types of learning modes; fully online and onsite classroom in which taught by the same lecturer with same learning objectives, assessment materials, and assignments. The finding is there were no significant differences among the student learning outcomes of on-site and distance learning modes. We concluded that the strategy and process of converting regular course module into the digital course one has no effect on the learning outcomes in both blended learning and distance learning strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信