机床节能支架设计与泵具能耗权衡案例研究

Ian C. Garretson, Qiuhao Guo, B. Linke
{"title":"机床节能支架设计与泵具能耗权衡案例研究","authors":"Ian C. Garretson, Qiuhao Guo, B. Linke","doi":"10.1115/detc2021-70939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Energy consumption of machine tools needs to be investigated and decomposed to determine areas for improvement. Motors are one key area of energy consumption, and the analysis of motors, including pump motors is useful for long term energy saving. The following paper describes the static and dynamic analysis of a machine tool stand and an energy analysis to compare manufacturing the stand against using the pump motor. The stand needed to be designed that would both withstand the static load of the machine and minimize vibrational excitation caused during grinding experiments. A review of life cycle inventories for induction motors was then undertaken to evaluate the manufacturing energy consumption of pump motors. A breakeven time was determined for the energy investment of replacing a coolant pump with a stand to conserve energy via gravity-fed coolant recirculation. The simulations were performed as worst-case scenarios and are not necessarily indicative of regular use. Results indicate that the stand as designed will not transmit any significant harmonic vibrations. Results of the energy comparison identify that fractional horsepower coolant pumps operating continuously can be replaced with a stand and the energy to produce the stand will break even within two to three years depending on operating schedule.","PeriodicalId":318534,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a Stand for Machine Tool Energy Efficiency, With Pump Embodied Energy Tradeoff Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Ian C. Garretson, Qiuhao Guo, B. Linke\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2021-70939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Energy consumption of machine tools needs to be investigated and decomposed to determine areas for improvement. Motors are one key area of energy consumption, and the analysis of motors, including pump motors is useful for long term energy saving. The following paper describes the static and dynamic analysis of a machine tool stand and an energy analysis to compare manufacturing the stand against using the pump motor. The stand needed to be designed that would both withstand the static load of the machine and minimize vibrational excitation caused during grinding experiments. A review of life cycle inventories for induction motors was then undertaken to evaluate the manufacturing energy consumption of pump motors. A breakeven time was determined for the energy investment of replacing a coolant pump with a stand to conserve energy via gravity-fed coolant recirculation. The simulations were performed as worst-case scenarios and are not necessarily indicative of regular use. Results indicate that the stand as designed will not transmit any significant harmonic vibrations. Results of the energy comparison identify that fractional horsepower coolant pumps operating continuously can be replaced with a stand and the energy to produce the stand will break even within two to three years depending on operating schedule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-70939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-70939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要对机床的能耗进行调查和分解,以确定需要改进的地方。电机是能源消耗的关键领域之一,对电机(包括泵电机)的分析有助于长期节能。本文介绍了机床支架的静态和动态分析,并进行了能量分析,以比较使用泵电机制造支架的情况。支架的设计需要既能承受机器的静载荷,又能最大限度地减少磨削实验过程中产生的振动激励。然后对感应电机的生命周期清单进行审查,以评估泵电机的制造能耗。为了通过重力供给的冷却剂再循环节省能源,我们确定了将冷却剂泵更换为支架的能源投资的盈亏平衡时间。模拟是在最坏的情况下进行的,并不一定表明经常使用。结果表明,设计的支架不会传播任何明显的谐波振动。能量比较的结果表明,连续运行的分马力冷却剂泵可以用支架代替,根据运行计划,生产支架的能量将在两到三年内达到收支平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a Stand for Machine Tool Energy Efficiency, With Pump Embodied Energy Tradeoff Case Study
Energy consumption of machine tools needs to be investigated and decomposed to determine areas for improvement. Motors are one key area of energy consumption, and the analysis of motors, including pump motors is useful for long term energy saving. The following paper describes the static and dynamic analysis of a machine tool stand and an energy analysis to compare manufacturing the stand against using the pump motor. The stand needed to be designed that would both withstand the static load of the machine and minimize vibrational excitation caused during grinding experiments. A review of life cycle inventories for induction motors was then undertaken to evaluate the manufacturing energy consumption of pump motors. A breakeven time was determined for the energy investment of replacing a coolant pump with a stand to conserve energy via gravity-fed coolant recirculation. The simulations were performed as worst-case scenarios and are not necessarily indicative of regular use. Results indicate that the stand as designed will not transmit any significant harmonic vibrations. Results of the energy comparison identify that fractional horsepower coolant pumps operating continuously can be replaced with a stand and the energy to produce the stand will break even within two to three years depending on operating schedule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信