现代性的边界:历史-自然-社会-世界

Raivis Bičevskis
{"title":"现代性的边界:历史-自然-社会-世界","authors":"Raivis Bičevskis","doi":"10.35539/ltnc.2022.0044.r.b.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I aim to show versions of describing modernity, in every one of which the protagonists realize the aporias of their projects and, in resolving these, face the temptation to “leave modernity.” The sketches of these versions turn to, first, in the medium of history, romanticism; second, in the medium of nature, literary criticism; third, in the society and technology medium, the theory of the reign of secondary systems; fourth, in the medium of the relationship between man and the world, the ideas of the third generation of ideas of the Frankfurt school of criticism after Habermas. The four discourses of modernity that appeared in the four sketches of the modernity aporia—the new mythology of romanticism, the recourse of cultural criticism to nature, the view of technology given through secondary systems theory, the promise of resonance with the world against alienation—balance on the boundary between the possible and the factual. It is quite obvious in the four aporia touched upon in the article (1) between the thesis of open-endedness of history and real battle of social-political and cultural-ideological constructs; (2) between the modern industrialization and glorification of nature and desire for the return of the primitive; (3) between the introduction of technical innovations and the transformation of technology from “secondary” to “primary”; (4) between the desire to control things and processes and the negative consequences of this desire. These aporias inflate when one (in trying to think within modernity) approaches the boundaries of modernity. From the perspectives of the four sketches of self-awareness, self-criticism, and self-continuation of modernity—outside social political programs and trends—I have tried to look into the aporias and battles of modernity, to whose ambivalence the protagonists of the sketches testify; the aporias of modernity in the descriptions and analyses of the sketches reveal the boundaries of modernity, which it pushes back and then again approximates.","PeriodicalId":439022,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Humanities in Latvia","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundaries of Modernity: History – Nature – Society – The World\",\"authors\":\"Raivis Bičevskis\",\"doi\":\"10.35539/ltnc.2022.0044.r.b.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I aim to show versions of describing modernity, in every one of which the protagonists realize the aporias of their projects and, in resolving these, face the temptation to “leave modernity.” The sketches of these versions turn to, first, in the medium of history, romanticism; second, in the medium of nature, literary criticism; third, in the society and technology medium, the theory of the reign of secondary systems; fourth, in the medium of the relationship between man and the world, the ideas of the third generation of ideas of the Frankfurt school of criticism after Habermas. The four discourses of modernity that appeared in the four sketches of the modernity aporia—the new mythology of romanticism, the recourse of cultural criticism to nature, the view of technology given through secondary systems theory, the promise of resonance with the world against alienation—balance on the boundary between the possible and the factual. It is quite obvious in the four aporia touched upon in the article (1) between the thesis of open-endedness of history and real battle of social-political and cultural-ideological constructs; (2) between the modern industrialization and glorification of nature and desire for the return of the primitive; (3) between the introduction of technical innovations and the transformation of technology from “secondary” to “primary”; (4) between the desire to control things and processes and the negative consequences of this desire. These aporias inflate when one (in trying to think within modernity) approaches the boundaries of modernity. From the perspectives of the four sketches of self-awareness, self-criticism, and self-continuation of modernity—outside social political programs and trends—I have tried to look into the aporias and battles of modernity, to whose ambivalence the protagonists of the sketches testify; the aporias of modernity in the descriptions and analyses of the sketches reveal the boundaries of modernity, which it pushes back and then again approximates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Humanities in Latvia\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Humanities in Latvia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35539/ltnc.2022.0044.r.b.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Humanities in Latvia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35539/ltnc.2022.0044.r.b.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇文章中,我的目的是展示描述现代性的版本,在每一个版本中,主人公都意识到他们项目的漏洞,并在解决这些问题时面临“离开现代性”的诱惑。这些版本的草图,首先,在历史的媒介,浪漫主义;第二,以自然为媒介的文学批评;第三,在社会和技术媒介中,二级系统的统治理论;第四,在人与世界关系的中介上,是哈贝马斯之后法兰克福批评学派第三代思想的思想。现代性的四种话语——浪漫主义的新神话、对自然的文化批判、通过二次系统理论给出的技术观、与世界共鸣反对异化的承诺——在可能与事实的边界上取得了平衡。在文章(1)中提到的历史的开放性论题与社会政治和文化意识形态建构的现实斗争之间的四个矛盾中,这一点非常明显;(2)现代工业化与美化自然、渴望回归原始之间的关系;(3)技术创新的引入与技术由“二级”向“一级”转化之间的关系;(4)控制事物和过程的欲望与这种欲望的消极后果之间的关系。当一个人(试图在现代性范围内思考)接近现代性的边界时,这些漏洞就会膨胀。从现代性的自我意识、自我批评和自我延续的四个小品的角度——在社会政治计划和趋势之外——我试图研究现代性的动荡和斗争,这些小品的主人公证明了现代性的矛盾心理;在对速写的描述和分析中,现代性的漏洞揭示了现代性的边界,它向后推,然后再次接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boundaries of Modernity: History – Nature – Society – The World
In this article, I aim to show versions of describing modernity, in every one of which the protagonists realize the aporias of their projects and, in resolving these, face the temptation to “leave modernity.” The sketches of these versions turn to, first, in the medium of history, romanticism; second, in the medium of nature, literary criticism; third, in the society and technology medium, the theory of the reign of secondary systems; fourth, in the medium of the relationship between man and the world, the ideas of the third generation of ideas of the Frankfurt school of criticism after Habermas. The four discourses of modernity that appeared in the four sketches of the modernity aporia—the new mythology of romanticism, the recourse of cultural criticism to nature, the view of technology given through secondary systems theory, the promise of resonance with the world against alienation—balance on the boundary between the possible and the factual. It is quite obvious in the four aporia touched upon in the article (1) between the thesis of open-endedness of history and real battle of social-political and cultural-ideological constructs; (2) between the modern industrialization and glorification of nature and desire for the return of the primitive; (3) between the introduction of technical innovations and the transformation of technology from “secondary” to “primary”; (4) between the desire to control things and processes and the negative consequences of this desire. These aporias inflate when one (in trying to think within modernity) approaches the boundaries of modernity. From the perspectives of the four sketches of self-awareness, self-criticism, and self-continuation of modernity—outside social political programs and trends—I have tried to look into the aporias and battles of modernity, to whose ambivalence the protagonists of the sketches testify; the aporias of modernity in the descriptions and analyses of the sketches reveal the boundaries of modernity, which it pushes back and then again approximates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信