Implicit Knowledge of AI-powered Creativity: With a Group of Experts in Each Field of Study

This study attempted to explore the influence of AI-powered creativity and the difference between AI-powered creativity and group perceptions by examining how expert groups perceive AI-powered creativity and what characteristics each group considers important. In consideration of the degree of concreteness of the output in the academic field, the subjects of the study were set in the fields of engineering, education/normal, social science, art, humanities, and natural sciences, and a total of 45 professors in the field were sampled. The survey contents consisted of the characteristics of creative products, the creativity of AI-using products, and the possibility of producing creative products using AI. As a result of the study, the characteristics of creative output were equally high in the fields of engineering and social science, and the resolution and sophistication of education and crime were the same, and the characteristics of novelty were the highest in art, humanities, and natural sciences. In addition, the Pro-C level was the highest in all academic fields. There was a higher perception that engineering, humanities, and natural sciences were still creative as to whether products using AI were creative or not, and that they were not creative in other academic areas. Finally, the possibility of producing creative products using AI in the future was relatively high in all academic fields.