政治风险会降低双边贸易流量吗?泰国面对其贸易伙伴的重力小组框架

Dr. Gour Gobinda Goswami, Nisit Panthamit
{"title":"政治风险会降低双边贸易流量吗?泰国面对其贸易伙伴的重力小组框架","authors":"Dr. Gour Gobinda Goswami, Nisit Panthamit","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-07-2020-0755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Political risk factors play a pivotal role in determining the bilateral trade flow of Asian countries in general and the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries in particular. The main purpose of this research paper is to examine the impact of disaggregated political risk in lowering the bilateral trade flow of Thailand, a prominent member of ASEAN, vis-a-vis her 132 trading partners.<br><br>Design/methodology/approach – Using panel data of Thailand with her partner countries for the period 1984–2015, this paper uses four different panel specifications named pooled ordinary least squares and random-effects estimations (estimated generalized least squares estimation) of three types by controlling for cross-sectional heteroscedasticity, time-wise heteroscedasticity, and contemporaneous correlation.<br><br>Findings – Holding other gravity-based determinants constant, for one unit increase in the ranking of indicator of the military in politics at home and abroad, trade flow decreases by 5–9% of the total trade flow of Thailand per year. For other types of political risks like government instability at home and abroad, difficulties in investment profile at home and abroad, and internal and external conflict at home and abroad, the decrease is also substantial and most statistically significant. The magnitude of loss due to the military channel at home and abroad can amount to US$9.38–US$16.88 bn per year for Thailand, after controlling for other gravity variables.<br><br>Research limitations/implications – The reasons for risk originating from different political channels could be explored at the regional or global level to understand their global and local dimensions. Practical implications – Policymakers should attempt to resolve the political risks at home and abroad in an amicable manner, through dialogue, so that bilateral trade flow is not inhibited.<br><br>Social implications – By taking economic reforms only, the trading problem cannot be resolved until and unless Thailand involves her society, politics, and administrative mechanisms in a conducive manner to facilitate her trade. A dialogue among bureaucracy, political authority, and military is beneficial in mitigating political risks.<br><br>Originality/value – The paper is unique in the sense that it makes a solid attempt to identify the potential channels of disaggregated political risk in affecting trade flow negatively, in a gravity framework, by controlling for different kinds of error structure.","PeriodicalId":398942,"journal":{"name":"Social Sciences eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Political Risk Lower Bilateral Trade Flow? A Gravity Panel Framework for Thailand Vis-a-Vis Her Trading Partners\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Gour Gobinda Goswami, Nisit Panthamit\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoem-07-2020-0755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – Political risk factors play a pivotal role in determining the bilateral trade flow of Asian countries in general and the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries in particular. The main purpose of this research paper is to examine the impact of disaggregated political risk in lowering the bilateral trade flow of Thailand, a prominent member of ASEAN, vis-a-vis her 132 trading partners.<br><br>Design/methodology/approach – Using panel data of Thailand with her partner countries for the period 1984–2015, this paper uses four different panel specifications named pooled ordinary least squares and random-effects estimations (estimated generalized least squares estimation) of three types by controlling for cross-sectional heteroscedasticity, time-wise heteroscedasticity, and contemporaneous correlation.<br><br>Findings – Holding other gravity-based determinants constant, for one unit increase in the ranking of indicator of the military in politics at home and abroad, trade flow decreases by 5–9% of the total trade flow of Thailand per year. For other types of political risks like government instability at home and abroad, difficulties in investment profile at home and abroad, and internal and external conflict at home and abroad, the decrease is also substantial and most statistically significant. The magnitude of loss due to the military channel at home and abroad can amount to US$9.38–US$16.88 bn per year for Thailand, after controlling for other gravity variables.<br><br>Research limitations/implications – The reasons for risk originating from different political channels could be explored at the regional or global level to understand their global and local dimensions. Practical implications – Policymakers should attempt to resolve the political risks at home and abroad in an amicable manner, through dialogue, so that bilateral trade flow is not inhibited.<br><br>Social implications – By taking economic reforms only, the trading problem cannot be resolved until and unless Thailand involves her society, politics, and administrative mechanisms in a conducive manner to facilitate her trade. A dialogue among bureaucracy, political authority, and military is beneficial in mitigating political risks.<br><br>Originality/value – The paper is unique in the sense that it makes a solid attempt to identify the potential channels of disaggregated political risk in affecting trade flow negatively, in a gravity framework, by controlling for different kinds of error structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Sciences eJournal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Sciences eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-07-2020-0755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Sciences eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-07-2020-0755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的-政治风险因素在决定亚洲国家和东南亚国家联盟(东盟)国家的双边贸易流动方面发挥着关键作用。本研究的主要目的是研究分解的政治风险在降低泰国的双边贸易流量方面的影响,泰国是东盟的重要成员,相对于她的132个贸易伙伴。设计/方法/方法-本文使用泰国及其伙伴国家1984-2015年的面板数据,通过控制横截面异方差、时间异方差和同期相关性,使用四种不同的面板规格,称为三种类型的合并普通最小二乘和随机效应估计(估计的广义最小二乘估计)。研究结果-保持其他基于重力的决定因素不变,军队在国内外政治中的指标排名每增加一个单位,泰国每年的贸易流量就会减少5-9%。对于国内外政府不稳定、国内外投资形势困难、国内外内外冲突等其他类型的政治风险,下降幅度也较大,且最具统计学意义。在控制其他重力变量后,泰国每年因国内外军事通道造成的损失可达938 - 168.8亿美元。研究局限/影响-可以在区域或全球层面探讨源自不同政治渠道的风险原因,以了解其全球和地方层面。实际意义——政策制定者应尝试以友好的方式,通过对话解决国内外的政治风险,使双边贸易流动不受抑制。社会影响-只有通过经济改革,贸易问题才能得到解决,除非泰国将其社会、政治和行政机制纳入有利的方式,以促进贸易。官僚、政治权威和军队之间的对话有利于降低政治风险。原创性/价值-该论文的独特之处在于,它通过控制不同类型的错误结构,在重力框架中,坚实地尝试确定对贸易流动产生负面影响的分解政治风险的潜在渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Political Risk Lower Bilateral Trade Flow? A Gravity Panel Framework for Thailand Vis-a-Vis Her Trading Partners
Purpose – Political risk factors play a pivotal role in determining the bilateral trade flow of Asian countries in general and the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries in particular. The main purpose of this research paper is to examine the impact of disaggregated political risk in lowering the bilateral trade flow of Thailand, a prominent member of ASEAN, vis-a-vis her 132 trading partners.

Design/methodology/approach – Using panel data of Thailand with her partner countries for the period 1984–2015, this paper uses four different panel specifications named pooled ordinary least squares and random-effects estimations (estimated generalized least squares estimation) of three types by controlling for cross-sectional heteroscedasticity, time-wise heteroscedasticity, and contemporaneous correlation.

Findings – Holding other gravity-based determinants constant, for one unit increase in the ranking of indicator of the military in politics at home and abroad, trade flow decreases by 5–9% of the total trade flow of Thailand per year. For other types of political risks like government instability at home and abroad, difficulties in investment profile at home and abroad, and internal and external conflict at home and abroad, the decrease is also substantial and most statistically significant. The magnitude of loss due to the military channel at home and abroad can amount to US$9.38–US$16.88 bn per year for Thailand, after controlling for other gravity variables.

Research limitations/implications – The reasons for risk originating from different political channels could be explored at the regional or global level to understand their global and local dimensions. Practical implications – Policymakers should attempt to resolve the political risks at home and abroad in an amicable manner, through dialogue, so that bilateral trade flow is not inhibited.

Social implications – By taking economic reforms only, the trading problem cannot be resolved until and unless Thailand involves her society, politics, and administrative mechanisms in a conducive manner to facilitate her trade. A dialogue among bureaucracy, political authority, and military is beneficial in mitigating political risks.

Originality/value – The paper is unique in the sense that it makes a solid attempt to identify the potential channels of disaggregated political risk in affecting trade flow negatively, in a gravity framework, by controlling for different kinds of error structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信