{"title":"三种Ni-Ti旋转锉的抗循环疲劳性能比较","authors":"Mohamed A. El-Dreny, M. Ibrahim, A. Badr","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2022.259772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Objective: To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of three Ni-Ti rotary files. Materials and Methods: A number of forty-five different nickel titanium rotary instruments (n = 15) were used in this study. All files were used according to their manufacturers' instructions. A specially designed, custom-made cyclic fatigue testing device was used in this study. The device had a simulated curved root canal within a stainless-steel block with a 45° angle of curvature and 5 mm radius of curvature. The time to fracture (TtF) in seconds was recorded visually using stopwatch. To characterize fracture mode, fractured fragments from each group were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey multiple comparison test with a statistical significance at p < 0.05 to compare the values of time to fracture (TtF) between the tested groups. Results: When comparing the time to fracture among the tested instruments, One-way ANOVA test revealed that there was a statistically significant difference among the three NiTi instruments (p < 0.05). HyFlex EDM had the highest resistance to cyclic fatigue resistance. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the fracture type of all instruments was ductile fracture. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, HyFlex EDM had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance among the Ni-Ti instruments.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Three Ni-Ti Rotary Files\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed A. El-Dreny, M. Ibrahim, A. Badr\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjd.2022.259772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Objective: To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of three Ni-Ti rotary files. Materials and Methods: A number of forty-five different nickel titanium rotary instruments (n = 15) were used in this study. All files were used according to their manufacturers' instructions. A specially designed, custom-made cyclic fatigue testing device was used in this study. The device had a simulated curved root canal within a stainless-steel block with a 45° angle of curvature and 5 mm radius of curvature. The time to fracture (TtF) in seconds was recorded visually using stopwatch. To characterize fracture mode, fractured fragments from each group were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey multiple comparison test with a statistical significance at p < 0.05 to compare the values of time to fracture (TtF) between the tested groups. Results: When comparing the time to fracture among the tested instruments, One-way ANOVA test revealed that there was a statistically significant difference among the three NiTi instruments (p < 0.05). HyFlex EDM had the highest resistance to cyclic fatigue resistance. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the fracture type of all instruments was ductile fracture. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, HyFlex EDM had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance among the Ni-Ti instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2022.259772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2022.259772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Three Ni-Ti Rotary Files
: Objective: To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of three Ni-Ti rotary files. Materials and Methods: A number of forty-five different nickel titanium rotary instruments (n = 15) were used in this study. All files were used according to their manufacturers' instructions. A specially designed, custom-made cyclic fatigue testing device was used in this study. The device had a simulated curved root canal within a stainless-steel block with a 45° angle of curvature and 5 mm radius of curvature. The time to fracture (TtF) in seconds was recorded visually using stopwatch. To characterize fracture mode, fractured fragments from each group were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey multiple comparison test with a statistical significance at p < 0.05 to compare the values of time to fracture (TtF) between the tested groups. Results: When comparing the time to fracture among the tested instruments, One-way ANOVA test revealed that there was a statistically significant difference among the three NiTi instruments (p < 0.05). HyFlex EDM had the highest resistance to cyclic fatigue resistance. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the fracture type of all instruments was ductile fracture. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, HyFlex EDM had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance among the Ni-Ti instruments.