基础设施和城市本体

Liz Varga, L. McMillan, S. Hallett, Tom Russell, Luke Smith, I. Truckell, A. Postnikov, Sunil Rodger, Noel Vizcaino, Bethan Perkins, B. Matthews, N. Lomax
{"title":"基础设施和城市本体","authors":"Liz Varga, L. McMillan, S. Hallett, Tom Russell, Luke Smith, I. Truckell, A. Postnikov, Sunil Rodger, Noel Vizcaino, Bethan Perkins, B. Matthews, N. Lomax","doi":"10.1680/jsmic.22.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creation and use of ontologies has become increasingly relevant for complex systems in recent years. This is because of the growing number of use cases that rely on real world integration of disparate systems; the need for semantic congruence across boundaries; and, the expectations of users for conceptual clarity within evolving domains or systems of interest. These needs are evident in most spheres of research involving complex systems but they are especially apparent in infrastructure and cities where traditionally siloed and sectoral approaches have dominated undermining the potential for integration to solve societal challenges such as net zero; resilience to climate change; equity and affordability. This paper reports on findings of a literature review on infrastructure and cities ontologies and puts forward some hypotheses inferred from the literature findings. The hypotheses are discussed with reference to literature and provide avenues for further research on (1) belief systems that underpin non top level ontologies and the potential for interference from them; (2) the need for a small number of top level ontologies and translation mechanisms between them; (3) clarity on the role of standards and information systems upon the adaptability and quality of datasets using ontologies. We also identify a gap in the extent ontologies can support more complex automated coupling and data transformation when dealing with different scales.","PeriodicalId":371248,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrastructure and cities ontologies\",\"authors\":\"Liz Varga, L. McMillan, S. Hallett, Tom Russell, Luke Smith, I. Truckell, A. Postnikov, Sunil Rodger, Noel Vizcaino, Bethan Perkins, B. Matthews, N. Lomax\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jsmic.22.00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The creation and use of ontologies has become increasingly relevant for complex systems in recent years. This is because of the growing number of use cases that rely on real world integration of disparate systems; the need for semantic congruence across boundaries; and, the expectations of users for conceptual clarity within evolving domains or systems of interest. These needs are evident in most spheres of research involving complex systems but they are especially apparent in infrastructure and cities where traditionally siloed and sectoral approaches have dominated undermining the potential for integration to solve societal challenges such as net zero; resilience to climate change; equity and affordability. This paper reports on findings of a literature review on infrastructure and cities ontologies and puts forward some hypotheses inferred from the literature findings. The hypotheses are discussed with reference to literature and provide avenues for further research on (1) belief systems that underpin non top level ontologies and the potential for interference from them; (2) the need for a small number of top level ontologies and translation mechanisms between them; (3) clarity on the role of standards and information systems upon the adaptability and quality of datasets using ontologies. We also identify a gap in the extent ontologies can support more complex automated coupling and data transformation when dealing with different scales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.22.00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.22.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,本体的创建和使用与复杂系统的关系越来越密切。这是因为越来越多的用例依赖于现实世界中不同系统的集成;跨边界语义一致性的需要;并且,用户对不断发展的领域或感兴趣的系统的概念清晰度的期望。这些需求在涉及复杂系统的大多数研究领域都很明显,但在基础设施和城市尤其明显,在这些领域,传统的孤立和部门方法占主导地位,破坏了一体化解决诸如净零等社会挑战的潜力;应对气候变化的能力;公平和负担能力。本文对基础设施与城市本体的相关文献进行了综述,并提出了一些假设。本文结合文献对这些假设进行了讨论,并为以下方面的进一步研究提供了途径:(1)支持非顶层本体的信念系统及其潜在的干扰;(2)需要少量的顶级本体和它们之间的转换机制;(3)明确标准和信息系统对使用本体的数据集的适应性和质量的作用。我们还确定了本体在处理不同规模时支持更复杂的自动化耦合和数据转换的程度上的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infrastructure and cities ontologies
The creation and use of ontologies has become increasingly relevant for complex systems in recent years. This is because of the growing number of use cases that rely on real world integration of disparate systems; the need for semantic congruence across boundaries; and, the expectations of users for conceptual clarity within evolving domains or systems of interest. These needs are evident in most spheres of research involving complex systems but they are especially apparent in infrastructure and cities where traditionally siloed and sectoral approaches have dominated undermining the potential for integration to solve societal challenges such as net zero; resilience to climate change; equity and affordability. This paper reports on findings of a literature review on infrastructure and cities ontologies and puts forward some hypotheses inferred from the literature findings. The hypotheses are discussed with reference to literature and provide avenues for further research on (1) belief systems that underpin non top level ontologies and the potential for interference from them; (2) the need for a small number of top level ontologies and translation mechanisms between them; (3) clarity on the role of standards and information systems upon the adaptability and quality of datasets using ontologies. We also identify a gap in the extent ontologies can support more complex automated coupling and data transformation when dealing with different scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信