行政权限:重新构想行政法

E. Fisher, S. Shapiro
{"title":"行政权限:重新构想行政法","authors":"E. Fisher, S. Shapiro","doi":"10.1017/9781108870818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this first chapter of a new book, Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press 2020), we provide an overview of our argument that administrative law should be, but is not, the law of public administration. As the law of public administration, administrative law would ensure that public administration is “competent” in that it has both legitimate authority and the necessary capacity to accomplish its mission. Instead, administrative law since the 1960s has been understood only to limit public administration in the mistaken belief that the alternative is policymaking without constraints. Administrative law has arrived at this point by treating what happens inside the agency as a “black box” rather than understanding the complex and multifaceted role that expertise plays in rationalizing decision-making and contributing to agency accountability. By comparison, the history of administrative law dating back to the Founding shows how administrative law has always been shaped by an understanding of administrative competence. In arguing for the legal relevancy of what goes inside of an agency, we are recognizing that an agency’s legitimacy depends on its capacity to implement its mandate as well as its legal authority to do so.","PeriodicalId":342163,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law\",\"authors\":\"E. Fisher, S. Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108870818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this first chapter of a new book, Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press 2020), we provide an overview of our argument that administrative law should be, but is not, the law of public administration. As the law of public administration, administrative law would ensure that public administration is “competent” in that it has both legitimate authority and the necessary capacity to accomplish its mission. Instead, administrative law since the 1960s has been understood only to limit public administration in the mistaken belief that the alternative is policymaking without constraints. Administrative law has arrived at this point by treating what happens inside the agency as a “black box” rather than understanding the complex and multifaceted role that expertise plays in rationalizing decision-making and contributing to agency accountability. By comparison, the history of administrative law dating back to the Founding shows how administrative law has always been shaped by an understanding of administrative competence. In arguing for the legal relevancy of what goes inside of an agency, we are recognizing that an agency’s legitimacy depends on its capacity to implement its mandate as well as its legal authority to do so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

在新书《行政权限:重新构想行政法》(剑桥大学出版社2020)的第一章中,我们概述了我们的论点,即行政法应该是,但不是公共行政的法律。作为公共行政法,行政法将确保公共行政是“有能力的”,因为它既有合法的权力,又有完成其使命的必要能力。相反,自20世纪60年代以来,行政法一直被理解为限制公共行政,因为人们错误地认为,另一种选择是不受约束的决策。行政法将机构内部发生的事情视为“黑盒子”,而不是理解专业知识在合理化决策和促进机构问责方面发挥的复杂和多方面的作用,从而达到了这一点。相比之下,行政法的历史可以追溯到建国时期,这表明行政法是如何始终受到对行政能力的理解的影响。在为一个机构内部发生的事情的法律相关性争论时,我们认识到一个机构的合法性取决于它执行其任务的能力以及它这样做的法律权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law
In this first chapter of a new book, Administrative Competence: Reimagining Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press 2020), we provide an overview of our argument that administrative law should be, but is not, the law of public administration. As the law of public administration, administrative law would ensure that public administration is “competent” in that it has both legitimate authority and the necessary capacity to accomplish its mission. Instead, administrative law since the 1960s has been understood only to limit public administration in the mistaken belief that the alternative is policymaking without constraints. Administrative law has arrived at this point by treating what happens inside the agency as a “black box” rather than understanding the complex and multifaceted role that expertise plays in rationalizing decision-making and contributing to agency accountability. By comparison, the history of administrative law dating back to the Founding shows how administrative law has always been shaped by an understanding of administrative competence. In arguing for the legal relevancy of what goes inside of an agency, we are recognizing that an agency’s legitimacy depends on its capacity to implement its mandate as well as its legal authority to do so.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信