堡垒,回水,还是前线?欧洲北岸战略观念的变化

Jeremy Stöhs
{"title":"堡垒,回水,还是前线?欧洲北岸战略观念的变化","authors":"Jeremy Stöhs","doi":"10.5771/9783845299150-321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2016, a quarter century after the end of the Cold War, an article co-authored by Vice Admiral James Foggo III, then Commander of the US 6th Fleet, gained significant attention within the defense community. Titled “The Fourth battle for the Atlantic,” in bold letters the admiral warned that “Russia is claiming maritime battlespace across Europe and is deploying forces outside Russian borders [...] A fourth battle is not looming, but is being waged now, across and underneath the oceans and seas that border Europe.”2 In their piece, Foggo and co-author Alarik Fritz recalled that up until end of the twentieth century, the geostrategic relevance attributed to the waters connecting North America and Europe had seen little change. The ability to send reinforcement from the United States by winning the ‘Battles for the Atlantic’ had been vital to the survival of European democracies during both World Wars.3 Throughout the Cold War, U.S. and NATO contingency planning drew from a similar premise, namely that the North Atlantic and its littorals would be highly contested:4 “[A]","PeriodicalId":363769,"journal":{"name":"Conceptualizing Maritime & Naval Strategy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bastion, Backwater, or Battlefront? Changing Strategic Views Along Europe’s Northern Shores\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Stöhs\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845299150-321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In June 2016, a quarter century after the end of the Cold War, an article co-authored by Vice Admiral James Foggo III, then Commander of the US 6th Fleet, gained significant attention within the defense community. Titled “The Fourth battle for the Atlantic,” in bold letters the admiral warned that “Russia is claiming maritime battlespace across Europe and is deploying forces outside Russian borders [...] A fourth battle is not looming, but is being waged now, across and underneath the oceans and seas that border Europe.”2 In their piece, Foggo and co-author Alarik Fritz recalled that up until end of the twentieth century, the geostrategic relevance attributed to the waters connecting North America and Europe had seen little change. The ability to send reinforcement from the United States by winning the ‘Battles for the Atlantic’ had been vital to the survival of European democracies during both World Wars.3 Throughout the Cold War, U.S. and NATO contingency planning drew from a similar premise, namely that the North Atlantic and its littorals would be highly contested:4 “[A]\",\"PeriodicalId\":363769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conceptualizing Maritime & Naval Strategy\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conceptualizing Maritime & Naval Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299150-321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conceptualizing Maritime & Naval Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299150-321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在冷战结束25年后的2016年6月,时任美国第六舰队司令詹姆斯·福戈中将与人合著的一篇文章引起了防务界的广泛关注。在题为《第四次大西洋战役》的文章中,这位海军上将用粗体字警告说,“俄罗斯声称拥有整个欧洲的海上作战空间,并在俄罗斯境外部署部队……第四场战争并没有迫在眉睫,但现在已经开始了,它横跨与欧洲接壤的大洋和海底。在他们的文章中,福戈和合著者阿拉里克·弗里茨回忆说,直到20世纪末,连接北美和欧洲的水域的地缘战略相关性几乎没有变化。在两次世界大战期间,通过赢得“大西洋战役”而从美国派遣增援部队的能力对欧洲民主国家的生存至关重要。在整个冷战期间,美国和北约的应急计划都基于一个类似的前提,即北大西洋及其沿海地区将是高度竞争的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bastion, Backwater, or Battlefront? Changing Strategic Views Along Europe’s Northern Shores
In June 2016, a quarter century after the end of the Cold War, an article co-authored by Vice Admiral James Foggo III, then Commander of the US 6th Fleet, gained significant attention within the defense community. Titled “The Fourth battle for the Atlantic,” in bold letters the admiral warned that “Russia is claiming maritime battlespace across Europe and is deploying forces outside Russian borders [...] A fourth battle is not looming, but is being waged now, across and underneath the oceans and seas that border Europe.”2 In their piece, Foggo and co-author Alarik Fritz recalled that up until end of the twentieth century, the geostrategic relevance attributed to the waters connecting North America and Europe had seen little change. The ability to send reinforcement from the United States by winning the ‘Battles for the Atlantic’ had been vital to the survival of European democracies during both World Wars.3 Throughout the Cold War, U.S. and NATO contingency planning drew from a similar premise, namely that the North Atlantic and its littorals would be highly contested:4 “[A]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信