下段剖宫产麻醉方式对新生儿apgar评分影响的比较研究

Neeru Gupta, K. India., Naine Bhadrala, H. Multani
{"title":"下段剖宫产麻醉方式对新生儿apgar评分影响的比较研究","authors":"Neeru Gupta, K. India., Naine Bhadrala, H. Multani","doi":"10.26611/10141018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To compare the effects of general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia on Apgar score in full term neonates born to elective caesarean section. Methods: The study was conducted on 90 healthy full term patients of ASA 1 and 2 category presenting for elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). 45 patients were given general anaesthesia and other 45 received spinal anaesthesia. The Apgar score was recorded at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth. Results: Out of 45 mothers who received general anaesthesia, 38 (84.4%) gave birth to neonates having Apgar score less than or equal to 6 at 1 minute after birth and the remaining 7 neonates (15.6%) had Apgar score of more than 7. Out of 38 babies only one baby continued to have Apgar score of less than or equal to 6 at 5 minutes. On the other hand, out of 45 mothers who received spinal anaesthesia, only 15 mothers gave birth to babies having Apgar score less than or equal to 6 at 1 minute after birth out of which 14 improved at 5 minutes with Apgar score of more than or equal to 7. Conclusion: We conclude based on the study results that babies born by LSCS under general anaesthesia are at higher risk of having low Apgar score (Less than or equal to 6) at 1 minute after birth. Key Word: Caesarean Section, General Anaesthesia, Spinal Anaesthesia, Apgar score *Address for Correspondence: Dr. Neerupam Gupta, Department of Pediatrics, Govt. Hospital Sarwal, Directorate of Health services, Jammu, J and K -180015, INDIA. Email: neroped@gmail.com Received Date: 20/01/2019 Revised Date: 27/02/2019 Accepted Date: 07/04/2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26611/10141018 INTRODUCTION The choice of anaesthesia for obstetric cases has been traditionally influenced by patient and physician preferences. It can be performed under general or regional anaesthesia like spinal or epidural technique. The obstetric anaesthetist requires special training and skills to provide safe anaesthesia. The anaesthetic techniques and agents chosen should provide good anaesthesia and analgesia with minimal effects on fetomaternal well being. Although most patients undergoing caesarean section are young and healthy, they represent a high risk group of patients. Either of general and spinal anaesthesia is not ideal for caesarean section because each has advantages and risk to both mother and foetus. However the aim of anaesthetist is to choose the method which is safest and most comfortable for the mother, least depressive to the new born and which provides optimal working conditions for obstetrician1. Apgar score is the best parameter to assess the immediate condition of the baby.2,3 It is the first non invasive test done to the new born after birth. It is a bedside clinical method to assess the health of the new born immediately after birth and to determine the need of any resuscitative measures. The scores are taken at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. Of the two scores, the 5 minutes score is regarded as the better predictor of survival whereas 1 minute score has the value in assessing the effects of different drugs given to the mother during caesarean section. We conducted a randomized prospective comparative study to see the effects of general versus spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean sections on Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes. Access this article online Quick Response Code: Website:","PeriodicalId":349984,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of type of anaesthesia in lower segment caesarean section on apgar score of new born babies: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Neeru Gupta, K. India., Naine Bhadrala, H. Multani\",\"doi\":\"10.26611/10141018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To compare the effects of general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia on Apgar score in full term neonates born to elective caesarean section. Methods: The study was conducted on 90 healthy full term patients of ASA 1 and 2 category presenting for elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). 45 patients were given general anaesthesia and other 45 received spinal anaesthesia. The Apgar score was recorded at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth. Results: Out of 45 mothers who received general anaesthesia, 38 (84.4%) gave birth to neonates having Apgar score less than or equal to 6 at 1 minute after birth and the remaining 7 neonates (15.6%) had Apgar score of more than 7. Out of 38 babies only one baby continued to have Apgar score of less than or equal to 6 at 5 minutes. On the other hand, out of 45 mothers who received spinal anaesthesia, only 15 mothers gave birth to babies having Apgar score less than or equal to 6 at 1 minute after birth out of which 14 improved at 5 minutes with Apgar score of more than or equal to 7. Conclusion: We conclude based on the study results that babies born by LSCS under general anaesthesia are at higher risk of having low Apgar score (Less than or equal to 6) at 1 minute after birth. Key Word: Caesarean Section, General Anaesthesia, Spinal Anaesthesia, Apgar score *Address for Correspondence: Dr. Neerupam Gupta, Department of Pediatrics, Govt. Hospital Sarwal, Directorate of Health services, Jammu, J and K -180015, INDIA. Email: neroped@gmail.com Received Date: 20/01/2019 Revised Date: 27/02/2019 Accepted Date: 07/04/2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26611/10141018 INTRODUCTION The choice of anaesthesia for obstetric cases has been traditionally influenced by patient and physician preferences. It can be performed under general or regional anaesthesia like spinal or epidural technique. The obstetric anaesthetist requires special training and skills to provide safe anaesthesia. The anaesthetic techniques and agents chosen should provide good anaesthesia and analgesia with minimal effects on fetomaternal well being. Although most patients undergoing caesarean section are young and healthy, they represent a high risk group of patients. Either of general and spinal anaesthesia is not ideal for caesarean section because each has advantages and risk to both mother and foetus. However the aim of anaesthetist is to choose the method which is safest and most comfortable for the mother, least depressive to the new born and which provides optimal working conditions for obstetrician1. Apgar score is the best parameter to assess the immediate condition of the baby.2,3 It is the first non invasive test done to the new born after birth. It is a bedside clinical method to assess the health of the new born immediately after birth and to determine the need of any resuscitative measures. The scores are taken at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. Of the two scores, the 5 minutes score is regarded as the better predictor of survival whereas 1 minute score has the value in assessing the effects of different drugs given to the mother during caesarean section. We conducted a randomized prospective comparative study to see the effects of general versus spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean sections on Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes. Access this article online Quick Response Code: Website:\",\"PeriodicalId\":349984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26611/10141018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/10141018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较全麻和脊髓麻醉对择期剖宫产足月新生儿Apgar评分的影响。方法:对90例ASA 1、2级健康足月患者择期剖宫产术(LSCS)进行研究。全麻45例,脊髓麻醉45例。分别于出生后1分钟和5分钟记录Apgar评分。结果:45例接受全麻的产妇中,38例(84.4%)分娩后1分钟Apgar评分小于等于6分的新生儿,其余7例(15.6%)分娩后Apgar评分大于7分。在38个婴儿中,只有一个婴儿在5分钟时的阿普加评分小于或等于6分。另一方面,在45名接受脊髓麻醉的母亲中,只有15名母亲生下的婴儿在出生后1分钟时Apgar评分小于或等于6,其中14名母亲在出生后5分钟时Apgar评分大于或等于7而有所改善。结论:根据研究结果,LSCS在全身麻醉下出生的婴儿在出生后1分钟出现低Apgar评分(小于或等于6)的风险较高。关键词:剖宫产,全身麻醉,脊髓麻醉,Apgar评分*通信地址:Neerupam Gupta医生,印度查谟,J和K -180015, Sarwal政府医院儿科。电子邮件:neroped@gmail.com接收日期:20/01/2019修订日期:27/02/2019接受日期:07/04/2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26611/10141018简介产科病例的麻醉选择传统上受到患者和医生偏好的影响。它可以在全身或局部麻醉下进行,如脊髓或硬膜外麻醉。产科麻醉师需要特殊的培训和技能来提供安全的麻醉。所选择的麻醉技术和药物应提供良好的麻醉和镇痛,对母婴健康的影响最小。虽然大多数接受剖腹产手术的患者年轻健康,但他们是高危患者群体。无论是全身麻醉还是脊髓麻醉都不适合剖宫产,因为每一种麻醉对母亲和胎儿都有好处和风险。然而,麻醉师的目的是选择对母亲最安全,最舒适,对新生儿抑郁最小的方法,并为产科医生提供最佳的工作条件。阿普加评分是评估婴儿当前状况的最佳参数。这是新生儿出生后进行的第一次非侵入性检查。它是一种床边临床方法,用于在新生儿出生后立即评估其健康状况,并确定是否需要采取任何复苏措施。测试在出生后1分钟和5分钟进行。在这两种评分中,5分钟评分被认为是更好的生存预测指标,而1分钟评分在评估剖宫产时给予母亲不同药物的效果方面具有价值。我们进行了一项随机前瞻性比较研究,以观察选择性剖宫产术中全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉对1分钟和5分钟Apgar评分的影响。在线访问本文快速响应代码:网站:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of type of anaesthesia in lower segment caesarean section on apgar score of new born babies: A comparative study
Background: To compare the effects of general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia on Apgar score in full term neonates born to elective caesarean section. Methods: The study was conducted on 90 healthy full term patients of ASA 1 and 2 category presenting for elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). 45 patients were given general anaesthesia and other 45 received spinal anaesthesia. The Apgar score was recorded at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth. Results: Out of 45 mothers who received general anaesthesia, 38 (84.4%) gave birth to neonates having Apgar score less than or equal to 6 at 1 minute after birth and the remaining 7 neonates (15.6%) had Apgar score of more than 7. Out of 38 babies only one baby continued to have Apgar score of less than or equal to 6 at 5 minutes. On the other hand, out of 45 mothers who received spinal anaesthesia, only 15 mothers gave birth to babies having Apgar score less than or equal to 6 at 1 minute after birth out of which 14 improved at 5 minutes with Apgar score of more than or equal to 7. Conclusion: We conclude based on the study results that babies born by LSCS under general anaesthesia are at higher risk of having low Apgar score (Less than or equal to 6) at 1 minute after birth. Key Word: Caesarean Section, General Anaesthesia, Spinal Anaesthesia, Apgar score *Address for Correspondence: Dr. Neerupam Gupta, Department of Pediatrics, Govt. Hospital Sarwal, Directorate of Health services, Jammu, J and K -180015, INDIA. Email: neroped@gmail.com Received Date: 20/01/2019 Revised Date: 27/02/2019 Accepted Date: 07/04/2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26611/10141018 INTRODUCTION The choice of anaesthesia for obstetric cases has been traditionally influenced by patient and physician preferences. It can be performed under general or regional anaesthesia like spinal or epidural technique. The obstetric anaesthetist requires special training and skills to provide safe anaesthesia. The anaesthetic techniques and agents chosen should provide good anaesthesia and analgesia with minimal effects on fetomaternal well being. Although most patients undergoing caesarean section are young and healthy, they represent a high risk group of patients. Either of general and spinal anaesthesia is not ideal for caesarean section because each has advantages and risk to both mother and foetus. However the aim of anaesthetist is to choose the method which is safest and most comfortable for the mother, least depressive to the new born and which provides optimal working conditions for obstetrician1. Apgar score is the best parameter to assess the immediate condition of the baby.2,3 It is the first non invasive test done to the new born after birth. It is a bedside clinical method to assess the health of the new born immediately after birth and to determine the need of any resuscitative measures. The scores are taken at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. Of the two scores, the 5 minutes score is regarded as the better predictor of survival whereas 1 minute score has the value in assessing the effects of different drugs given to the mother during caesarean section. We conducted a randomized prospective comparative study to see the effects of general versus spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean sections on Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes. Access this article online Quick Response Code: Website:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信