{"title":"Anti-Laokoön: Web上imagettext的混合和合并模式","authors":"George Dillon","doi":"10.1163/9789401202640_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was painting on canvas that was, I think, a faithful rendering of a photo with a guy leaning against a pole smack in the middle, with the word \"wrong\" at the bottom. This is meta-discourse; I had never seen photographic metadiscourse before. Not only did he use a dumb photo, he made a point of it by sticking a word on it, because of course words were forbidden in photography (Rosler 1998:198:38).","PeriodicalId":119722,"journal":{"name":"The Writer's Craft, the Culture's Technology","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Laokoön: Mixed and Merged Modes of Imagetext on the Web\",\"authors\":\"George Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789401202640_006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was painting on canvas that was, I think, a faithful rendering of a photo with a guy leaning against a pole smack in the middle, with the word \\\"wrong\\\" at the bottom. This is meta-discourse; I had never seen photographic metadiscourse before. Not only did he use a dumb photo, he made a point of it by sticking a word on it, because of course words were forbidden in photography (Rosler 1998:198:38).\",\"PeriodicalId\":119722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Writer's Craft, the Culture's Technology\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Writer's Craft, the Culture's Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401202640_006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Writer's Craft, the Culture's Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401202640_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anti-Laokoön: Mixed and Merged Modes of Imagetext on the Web
It was painting on canvas that was, I think, a faithful rendering of a photo with a guy leaning against a pole smack in the middle, with the word "wrong" at the bottom. This is meta-discourse; I had never seen photographic metadiscourse before. Not only did he use a dumb photo, he made a point of it by sticking a word on it, because of course words were forbidden in photography (Rosler 1998:198:38).