性与文化

Ad De Bruijne
{"title":"性与文化","authors":"Ad De Bruijne","doi":"10.54195/rs.12215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contends that the culture war between orthodox Christians and late modern propagators of sexual emancipation should be abandoned in favour of a constructive dialogue. Such a dialogue becomes possible when we no longer presuppose a break between the late modern and the traditional Christian narrative but conceive of both as closely related and even interconnected. Building on the work of authors such as Charles Taylor and Oliver O’Donovan this is demonstrated with respect to some features of late modern sexuality. Against that background some proposals are made to illustrate how a dialogue with the ‘opposing’ party would, in fact, be profitable to both.","PeriodicalId":286339,"journal":{"name":"Religie & Samenleving","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seksualiteit en cultuurstrijd\",\"authors\":\"Ad De Bruijne\",\"doi\":\"10.54195/rs.12215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article contends that the culture war between orthodox Christians and late modern propagators of sexual emancipation should be abandoned in favour of a constructive dialogue. Such a dialogue becomes possible when we no longer presuppose a break between the late modern and the traditional Christian narrative but conceive of both as closely related and even interconnected. Building on the work of authors such as Charles Taylor and Oliver O’Donovan this is demonstrated with respect to some features of late modern sexuality. Against that background some proposals are made to illustrate how a dialogue with the ‘opposing’ party would, in fact, be profitable to both.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religie & Samenleving\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religie & Samenleving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.12215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religie & Samenleving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.12215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,应放弃正统基督徒与晚期性解放宣传者之间的文化战争,转而进行建设性的对话。当我们不再假设晚期现代和传统基督教叙事之间的断裂,而是将两者视为密切相关甚至相互关联时,这样的对话就成为可能。基于查尔斯·泰勒和奥利弗·奥多诺万等作家的作品,这一点在现代晚期性行为的一些特征方面得到了证明。在此背景下,提出了一些建议,以说明与“对立”政党的对话实际上如何对双方都有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seksualiteit en cultuurstrijd
This article contends that the culture war between orthodox Christians and late modern propagators of sexual emancipation should be abandoned in favour of a constructive dialogue. Such a dialogue becomes possible when we no longer presuppose a break between the late modern and the traditional Christian narrative but conceive of both as closely related and even interconnected. Building on the work of authors such as Charles Taylor and Oliver O’Donovan this is demonstrated with respect to some features of late modern sexuality. Against that background some proposals are made to illustrate how a dialogue with the ‘opposing’ party would, in fact, be profitable to both.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信