Sam Meerhoff
{"title":"Hardnekkig hetero","authors":"Sam Meerhoff","doi":"10.54195/rs.12210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2012, Dutch schools have been legally obliged to teach about sexual diversity. Yet, little is known about how this is implemented. Based on classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with teachers and content analysis of teaching materials, this article analyzes secondary-school teachers’ discourse and practices. It was found that sexual diversity remains a marginalized subject, which is usually discussed in merely one of a series of lessons on sexuality that makes part of the biology curriculum. Both in faith-based and in non-religious schools, teachers primarily aim at showing students how LGBT-people are discriminated against, and at making them reflect on how to respond if someone close to them were to come out as being gay. An unintended consequence of this approach is that it reconfirms heterosexuality as a norm, and fails to empower LGBT-students.","PeriodicalId":286339,"journal":{"name":"Religie & Samenleving","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religie & Samenleving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.12210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2012年以来,荷兰的学校在法律上有义务教授性别多样性。然而,人们对这是如何实现的知之甚少。本文通过课堂观察、教师半结构化访谈和教材内容分析,对中学教师的话语和实践进行了分析。研究发现,性多样性仍然是一个被边缘化的话题,通常只在生物学课程中关于性的一系列课程中讨论。无论是在宗教学校还是在非宗教学校,教师的主要目标都是向学生展示lgbt群体是如何受到歧视的,并让他们思考,如果他们身边的人出柜了,他们该如何应对。这种方法的一个意想不到的后果是,它再次确认了异性恋是一种常态,并没有赋予lgbt学生权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hardnekkig hetero
Since 2012, Dutch schools have been legally obliged to teach about sexual diversity. Yet, little is known about how this is implemented. Based on classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with teachers and content analysis of teaching materials, this article analyzes secondary-school teachers’ discourse and practices. It was found that sexual diversity remains a marginalized subject, which is usually discussed in merely one of a series of lessons on sexuality that makes part of the biology curriculum. Both in faith-based and in non-religious schools, teachers primarily aim at showing students how LGBT-people are discriminated against, and at making them reflect on how to respond if someone close to them were to come out as being gay. An unintended consequence of this approach is that it reconfirms heterosexuality as a norm, and fails to empower LGBT-students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信