ITER屏蔽模块流动优化研究

G. Natoni, D. Youchison, M. Ulrickson, M. Sawan
{"title":"ITER屏蔽模块流动优化研究","authors":"G. Natoni, D. Youchison, M. Ulrickson, M. Sawan","doi":"10.1109/FUSION.2007.4337896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 3-d, 4-channel prototypical model representing a subset of an ITER neutron shield module was analyzed using computational fluid dynamics. We used this model to optimize the radial gaps in the coaxial flow drivers along with the depth of the radial holes or channels in the stainless steel modules. In addition to redirecting the flow first to the back of the module and then to the front, the flow drivers increase the pressure drop in the radial tubes to allow for more uniform flow distribution from the back-drilled manifolds. They also increase the fluid velocity near the wall for improved heat transfer. We sized the flow drivers to allow for 2, 3 and 4-millimeter (mm) gaps along the annuli. The depths of the radial channels below the manifold were 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm for each of the 2, 3, and 4 mm radial gaps. The objective of the study was to ascertain if a fixed 90-mm length on the bottom flow driver could be utilized for radial channels of varying depth below the back-drilled manifold and still provide adequate cooling for the neutron thermal load. Our group also performed an optimization of the gap around the tee-vane in the shield module front header. Tee-vane gaps of 1, 2 and 3 mm were studied to assess the flow bypass and wall velocities at the end of the model. In this article, we present the results of a full matrix of flow simulations using the CFdesign CFD package. The study indicates that a 90-mm-long flow driver with a 4-mm radial gap can keep the steel around the radial tubes sufficiently cool up to 30 mm beneath the back-drilled manifold. We also discovered that flow bypass through the end gap on the tee-vane is relatively small and has little effect on cooling of the front cover plate for gap sizes as large as 3 mm.","PeriodicalId":124369,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE 22nd Symposium on Fusion Engineering","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow Optimization Studies for the ITER Shield Modules\",\"authors\":\"G. Natoni, D. Youchison, M. Ulrickson, M. Sawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUSION.2007.4337896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A 3-d, 4-channel prototypical model representing a subset of an ITER neutron shield module was analyzed using computational fluid dynamics. We used this model to optimize the radial gaps in the coaxial flow drivers along with the depth of the radial holes or channels in the stainless steel modules. In addition to redirecting the flow first to the back of the module and then to the front, the flow drivers increase the pressure drop in the radial tubes to allow for more uniform flow distribution from the back-drilled manifolds. They also increase the fluid velocity near the wall for improved heat transfer. We sized the flow drivers to allow for 2, 3 and 4-millimeter (mm) gaps along the annuli. The depths of the radial channels below the manifold were 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm for each of the 2, 3, and 4 mm radial gaps. The objective of the study was to ascertain if a fixed 90-mm length on the bottom flow driver could be utilized for radial channels of varying depth below the back-drilled manifold and still provide adequate cooling for the neutron thermal load. Our group also performed an optimization of the gap around the tee-vane in the shield module front header. Tee-vane gaps of 1, 2 and 3 mm were studied to assess the flow bypass and wall velocities at the end of the model. In this article, we present the results of a full matrix of flow simulations using the CFdesign CFD package. The study indicates that a 90-mm-long flow driver with a 4-mm radial gap can keep the steel around the radial tubes sufficiently cool up to 30 mm beneath the back-drilled manifold. We also discovered that flow bypass through the end gap on the tee-vane is relatively small and has little effect on cooling of the front cover plate for gap sizes as large as 3 mm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE 22nd Symposium on Fusion Engineering\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE 22nd Symposium on Fusion Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.2007.4337896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE 22nd Symposium on Fusion Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.2007.4337896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

利用计算流体动力学方法对ITER中子屏蔽模块子集的三维四通道原型模型进行了分析。我们使用该模型优化了同轴流驱动器的径向间隙以及不锈钢模块中径向孔或通道的深度。除了将流体先定向到模块的后部,然后再定向到模块的前部之外,流动驱动器还增加了径向管中的压降,从而使后钻歧管的流动分布更加均匀。它们还增加了壁面附近的流体速度,以改善传热。我们调整了流动驱动器的尺寸,以允许环空沿2、3和4毫米(mm)的间隙。对于2、3和4毫米的径向间隙,歧管下方的径向通道深度分别为10、15、20、25和30毫米。研究的目的是确定底部流动驱动器上固定的90毫米长度是否可以用于后钻歧管下方不同深度的径向通道,并且仍然为中子热负荷提供足够的冷却。我们的团队还对屏蔽模块前封头的导叶周围的间隙进行了优化。研究了1、2和3 mm的叶片间隙,以评估模型结束时的流动旁路和壁面速度。在本文中,我们展示了使用CFdesign CFD软件包的完整矩阵流模拟的结果。研究表明,一个长90毫米、径向间隙为4毫米的流体驱动器可以使径向管周围的钢保持足够的冷却,直至回钻歧管下方30毫米处。我们还发现,通过翼片末端间隙的旁路流量相对较小,对于间隙大小为3mm的前盖板的冷却影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flow Optimization Studies for the ITER Shield Modules
A 3-d, 4-channel prototypical model representing a subset of an ITER neutron shield module was analyzed using computational fluid dynamics. We used this model to optimize the radial gaps in the coaxial flow drivers along with the depth of the radial holes or channels in the stainless steel modules. In addition to redirecting the flow first to the back of the module and then to the front, the flow drivers increase the pressure drop in the radial tubes to allow for more uniform flow distribution from the back-drilled manifolds. They also increase the fluid velocity near the wall for improved heat transfer. We sized the flow drivers to allow for 2, 3 and 4-millimeter (mm) gaps along the annuli. The depths of the radial channels below the manifold were 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm for each of the 2, 3, and 4 mm radial gaps. The objective of the study was to ascertain if a fixed 90-mm length on the bottom flow driver could be utilized for radial channels of varying depth below the back-drilled manifold and still provide adequate cooling for the neutron thermal load. Our group also performed an optimization of the gap around the tee-vane in the shield module front header. Tee-vane gaps of 1, 2 and 3 mm were studied to assess the flow bypass and wall velocities at the end of the model. In this article, we present the results of a full matrix of flow simulations using the CFdesign CFD package. The study indicates that a 90-mm-long flow driver with a 4-mm radial gap can keep the steel around the radial tubes sufficiently cool up to 30 mm beneath the back-drilled manifold. We also discovered that flow bypass through the end gap on the tee-vane is relatively small and has little effect on cooling of the front cover plate for gap sizes as large as 3 mm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信