屏幕感官的方法论批判:现象学案例

R. Cook
{"title":"屏幕感官的方法论批判:现象学案例","authors":"R. Cook","doi":"10.13165/SMS-15-7-1-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This philosophy paper addresses the question of why phenomenology is the best research method for investigating visual perception of screen media, or screen sense. Disciplines cannot be justifi ed adequately by assumptions that give rise to them. A scientist’s duty to question founding assumptions is satisfi ed only by stepping outside one’s own tradition to acquire a critical perspective. Th us, integrity in scientific inquiry rests on openness to criticism from perspectives outside one’s own traditions, a consciousness of tolerance. Phenomenology claims for itself a capacity for such critical self-refl ection and openness to multidisciplinary debate1. In summary, methodological validity for the study of screen sense begins with a phenomenologist’s openness to criticism and moves through critique of other perspectives toward an authentic, unified investigation.","PeriodicalId":256611,"journal":{"name":"Societal Studies","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE FOR SCREEN SENSE: A CASE FOR PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"R. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.13165/SMS-15-7-1-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This philosophy paper addresses the question of why phenomenology is the best research method for investigating visual perception of screen media, or screen sense. Disciplines cannot be justifi ed adequately by assumptions that give rise to them. A scientist’s duty to question founding assumptions is satisfi ed only by stepping outside one’s own tradition to acquire a critical perspective. Th us, integrity in scientific inquiry rests on openness to criticism from perspectives outside one’s own traditions, a consciousness of tolerance. Phenomenology claims for itself a capacity for such critical self-refl ection and openness to multidisciplinary debate1. In summary, methodological validity for the study of screen sense begins with a phenomenologist’s openness to criticism and moves through critique of other perspectives toward an authentic, unified investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Societal Studies\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Societal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13165/SMS-15-7-1-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/SMS-15-7-1-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇哲学论文阐述了为什么现象学是研究屏幕媒体视觉感知或屏幕感觉的最佳研究方法。纪律不能通过产生它们的假设来充分证明其合理性。只有走出自己的传统,获得批判性的视角,才能满足科学家质疑基础假设的责任。因此,科学探究的完整性取决于对来自自己传统之外的观点的批评持开放态度,一种宽容的意识。现象学声称自己具有这种批判性自我反思和对多学科辩论开放的能力。总之,屏幕感研究的方法论有效性始于现象学家对批评的开放态度,并通过对其他观点的批评走向真实的、统一的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE FOR SCREEN SENSE: A CASE FOR PHENOMENOLOGY
This philosophy paper addresses the question of why phenomenology is the best research method for investigating visual perception of screen media, or screen sense. Disciplines cannot be justifi ed adequately by assumptions that give rise to them. A scientist’s duty to question founding assumptions is satisfi ed only by stepping outside one’s own tradition to acquire a critical perspective. Th us, integrity in scientific inquiry rests on openness to criticism from perspectives outside one’s own traditions, a consciousness of tolerance. Phenomenology claims for itself a capacity for such critical self-refl ection and openness to multidisciplinary debate1. In summary, methodological validity for the study of screen sense begins with a phenomenologist’s openness to criticism and moves through critique of other perspectives toward an authentic, unified investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信