反思、回顾与修改:使用清单改善学生的实验报告

Thirumarai Chelvan Ilamparithi, M. A. Smith, S. Ghosh
{"title":"反思、回顾与修改:使用清单改善学生的实验报告","authors":"Thirumarai Chelvan Ilamparithi, M. A. Smith, S. Ghosh","doi":"10.1109/procomm52174.2021.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present preliminary findings from our study on how to help 2nd year Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students enrolled in a design course improve the written quality of their reports. ECE students focus on the design aspects of their lab projects but tend to neglect the textual aspects. Hence, our motivating inquiry aimed to find a convenient, low-investment way of getting ECE students to improve the formatting, graphics, and style of their reports without the professor or TAs having to give up valuable lab or lecture time to writing instruction. The proposed solution is uniquely simple and manageable: a self-review checklist. To determine whether using a self-review checklist would prompt students to improve their writing, we compared and contrasted 27 reports produced by groups of students before they had access to a checklist with reports produced after they had access to a checklist. Although improvements in writing style appear to be minimal, early analysis shows that robust gains were made in document formatting and integration of graphics.","PeriodicalId":278101,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflect, Review, and Revise: Using Checklists to Improve Students’ Lab Reports\",\"authors\":\"Thirumarai Chelvan Ilamparithi, M. A. Smith, S. Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/procomm52174.2021.00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present preliminary findings from our study on how to help 2nd year Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students enrolled in a design course improve the written quality of their reports. ECE students focus on the design aspects of their lab projects but tend to neglect the textual aspects. Hence, our motivating inquiry aimed to find a convenient, low-investment way of getting ECE students to improve the formatting, graphics, and style of their reports without the professor or TAs having to give up valuable lab or lecture time to writing instruction. The proposed solution is uniquely simple and manageable: a self-review checklist. To determine whether using a self-review checklist would prompt students to improve their writing, we compared and contrasted 27 reports produced by groups of students before they had access to a checklist with reports produced after they had access to a checklist. Although improvements in writing style appear to be minimal, early analysis shows that robust gains were made in document formatting and integration of graphics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm52174.2021.00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm52174.2021.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了我们关于如何帮助电气和计算机工程(ECE)二年级学生在设计课程中提高书面报告质量的初步研究结果。欧洲经委会学生专注于他们的实验项目的设计方面,但往往忽视文本方面。因此,我们的动机调查旨在找到一种方便,低投资的方式,让ECE学生改进他们报告的格式,图形和风格,而教授或助教不必放弃宝贵的实验室或讲座时间来写作指导。建议的解决方案非常简单且易于管理:一个自我检查清单。为了确定使用自我审查清单是否会促使学生提高他们的写作水平,我们比较并对比了27份由学生小组在获得清单之前和获得清单后产生的报告。虽然在写作风格方面的改进似乎微乎其微,但早期分析表明,在文档格式和图形集成方面取得了显著进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflect, Review, and Revise: Using Checklists to Improve Students’ Lab Reports
We present preliminary findings from our study on how to help 2nd year Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students enrolled in a design course improve the written quality of their reports. ECE students focus on the design aspects of their lab projects but tend to neglect the textual aspects. Hence, our motivating inquiry aimed to find a convenient, low-investment way of getting ECE students to improve the formatting, graphics, and style of their reports without the professor or TAs having to give up valuable lab or lecture time to writing instruction. The proposed solution is uniquely simple and manageable: a self-review checklist. To determine whether using a self-review checklist would prompt students to improve their writing, we compared and contrasted 27 reports produced by groups of students before they had access to a checklist with reports produced after they had access to a checklist. Although improvements in writing style appear to be minimal, early analysis shows that robust gains were made in document formatting and integration of graphics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信