{"title":"Michel Houellebecq的《希望的可能性》","authors":"Xinying Liu","doi":"10.4467/23538953ce.22.002.15623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibility of hope in Michel Houellebecq\n\nOften considered depressive, Michel Houellebecq’s writing seems to be at the antipodes of hope, even if fragile. In this article, we will attempt to explore the three levels of hope in the author’s work. Hope in Houellebecq’s writing is first presented in a derisory way as a variant of an illusion. It constitutes an evil associated with sexual desires in contemporary hyper-liberalist society. Then, the author stages a positivist utopia, that of immortal neo-humans. But hope does not exist in this post-human society. Finally, by freeing himself from all illusory hopes, the author intends to seek hope in the present, in the manner of Schopenhauerian contemplation. He uses an approach that is both clinical and pathetic and gives a new form to hope that hopes for the unhoped-for.","PeriodicalId":133418,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers ERTA","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La possibilité de l’espoir chez Michel Houellebecq\",\"authors\":\"Xinying Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/23538953ce.22.002.15623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The possibility of hope in Michel Houellebecq\\n\\nOften considered depressive, Michel Houellebecq’s writing seems to be at the antipodes of hope, even if fragile. In this article, we will attempt to explore the three levels of hope in the author’s work. Hope in Houellebecq’s writing is first presented in a derisory way as a variant of an illusion. It constitutes an evil associated with sexual desires in contemporary hyper-liberalist society. Then, the author stages a positivist utopia, that of immortal neo-humans. But hope does not exist in this post-human society. Finally, by freeing himself from all illusory hopes, the author intends to seek hope in the present, in the manner of Schopenhauerian contemplation. He uses an approach that is both clinical and pathetic and gives a new form to hope that hopes for the unhoped-for.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cahiers ERTA\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cahiers ERTA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953ce.22.002.15623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers ERTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953ce.22.002.15623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Michel Houellebecq的作品通常被认为是抑郁的,但他的作品似乎处于希望的对立面,即使是脆弱的。在本文中,我们将尝试探索作者作品中三个层次的希望。在Houellebecq的作品中,希望首先以一种嘲笑的方式呈现,作为一种幻觉的变体。在当代超自由主义社会中,它构成了与性欲有关的邪恶。然后,作者提出了一个实证主义的乌托邦,一个不朽的新人类的乌托邦。但是在这个后人类社会中不存在希望。最后,通过将自己从所有虚幻的希望中解放出来,作者打算以叔本华式的沉思方式在当下寻求希望。他采用了一种既客观又可悲的方法,为无望的人带来了一种新的希望。
La possibilité de l’espoir chez Michel Houellebecq
The possibility of hope in Michel Houellebecq
Often considered depressive, Michel Houellebecq’s writing seems to be at the antipodes of hope, even if fragile. In this article, we will attempt to explore the three levels of hope in the author’s work. Hope in Houellebecq’s writing is first presented in a derisory way as a variant of an illusion. It constitutes an evil associated with sexual desires in contemporary hyper-liberalist society. Then, the author stages a positivist utopia, that of immortal neo-humans. But hope does not exist in this post-human society. Finally, by freeing himself from all illusory hopes, the author intends to seek hope in the present, in the manner of Schopenhauerian contemplation. He uses an approach that is both clinical and pathetic and gives a new form to hope that hopes for the unhoped-for.