Krists Ansons
{"title":"Savstarpējo saskaņošanas procedūru institūta ekskluzivitāte nodokļu strīdu risināšanā","authors":"Krists Ansons","doi":"10.22364/juzk.80.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essence of mutual agreement procedure institute in practical application has been ambiguous. The topic has become increasingly relevant, as more taxpayers elect to use this procedure. Ever since the previous paper, there have been many actions taken by the state in order to increase the impact of legal certainty principle. Here, the author will address defining mutual agreement procedure institute with a focus on clearing any confusion between the institute and other tools for eliminating double taxation.","PeriodicalId":413617,"journal":{"name":"Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 100","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 100","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.80.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

协议程序制度在实际应用中的本质是模糊的。随着越来越多的纳税人选择使用这一程序,这个话题变得越来越重要。自上一篇论文以来,国家采取了许多行动,以增加法律确定性原则的影响。在这里,作者将讨论如何定义相互协议程序制度,重点是清除制度与消除双重征税的其他工具之间的任何混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Savstarpējo saskaņošanas procedūru institūta ekskluzivitāte nodokļu strīdu risināšanā
The essence of mutual agreement procedure institute in practical application has been ambiguous. The topic has become increasingly relevant, as more taxpayers elect to use this procedure. Ever since the previous paper, there have been many actions taken by the state in order to increase the impact of legal certainty principle. Here, the author will address defining mutual agreement procedure institute with a focus on clearing any confusion between the institute and other tools for eliminating double taxation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信