风险评估和评价的新趋势

K. Bowman, D. Huffman, J. Akers
{"title":"风险评估和评价的新趋势","authors":"K. Bowman, D. Huffman, J. Akers","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk assessment is one of the primary tools that management teams use to determine if a product should be taken to market. If the risk associated with the product concept is at an acceptable level, the product proceeds into the design phase. Throughout the product lifecycle, the risk assessment is updated and refined as product functions are built out into the design. Different industries use different tools for risk assessment, but their purpose is the same: to minimize product risk factors. In this paper, we discuss emerging trends in risk assessment for increasing both the value and efficiency of analyses. For example, by taking a systems engineering approach to FMEAs, companies are now rolling failure modes laterally to other subassemblies that can be affected by the same failure rather than merely rolling these modes up product tree structures. Additionally, systems engineers are using the top-down approach common to fault tree analysis and then breaking out only the highest risks into detailed FMEAs to save time. Yet another trend includes linking a FMEA directly to a FRACAS. This allows a direct comparison of what failure modes were predicted to occur (and at what rate) against what is actually seen in the field. This paper will give case studies demonstrating these emerging trends in risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":189714,"journal":{"name":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging trends in risk assessment and evaluation\",\"authors\":\"K. Bowman, D. Huffman, J. Akers\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Risk assessment is one of the primary tools that management teams use to determine if a product should be taken to market. If the risk associated with the product concept is at an acceptable level, the product proceeds into the design phase. Throughout the product lifecycle, the risk assessment is updated and refined as product functions are built out into the design. Different industries use different tools for risk assessment, but their purpose is the same: to minimize product risk factors. In this paper, we discuss emerging trends in risk assessment for increasing both the value and efficiency of analyses. For example, by taking a systems engineering approach to FMEAs, companies are now rolling failure modes laterally to other subassemblies that can be affected by the same failure rather than merely rolling these modes up product tree structures. Additionally, systems engineers are using the top-down approach common to fault tree analysis and then breaking out only the highest risks into detailed FMEAs to save time. Yet another trend includes linking a FMEA directly to a FRACAS. This allows a direct comparison of what failure modes were predicted to occur (and at what rate) against what is actually seen in the field. This paper will give case studies demonstrating these emerging trends in risk assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2013.6517691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险评估是管理团队用来决定是否将产品推向市场的主要工具之一。如果与产品概念相关的风险处于可接受的水平,则产品继续进入设计阶段。在整个产品生命周期中,随着产品功能被构建到设计中,风险评估被更新和改进。不同的行业使用不同的工具进行风险评估,但它们的目的是相同的:最小化产品风险因素。在本文中,我们讨论了风险评估的新趋势,以提高分析的价值和效率。例如,通过对fmea采用系统工程方法,公司现在将故障模式横向滚动到可能受到相同故障影响的其他子组件上,而不仅仅是将这些模式滚动到产品树结构上。此外,系统工程师正在使用故障树分析中常见的自顶向下的方法,然后只将最高的风险分解为详细的fmea,以节省时间。然而,另一个趋势是将FMEA直接与FRACAS联系起来。这样就可以将预测的失效模式(以及发生的速率)与现场实际情况进行直接比较。本文将通过案例研究来展示风险评估中的这些新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emerging trends in risk assessment and evaluation
Risk assessment is one of the primary tools that management teams use to determine if a product should be taken to market. If the risk associated with the product concept is at an acceptable level, the product proceeds into the design phase. Throughout the product lifecycle, the risk assessment is updated and refined as product functions are built out into the design. Different industries use different tools for risk assessment, but their purpose is the same: to minimize product risk factors. In this paper, we discuss emerging trends in risk assessment for increasing both the value and efficiency of analyses. For example, by taking a systems engineering approach to FMEAs, companies are now rolling failure modes laterally to other subassemblies that can be affected by the same failure rather than merely rolling these modes up product tree structures. Additionally, systems engineers are using the top-down approach common to fault tree analysis and then breaking out only the highest risks into detailed FMEAs to save time. Yet another trend includes linking a FMEA directly to a FRACAS. This allows a direct comparison of what failure modes were predicted to occur (and at what rate) against what is actually seen in the field. This paper will give case studies demonstrating these emerging trends in risk assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信