环境危急

P. Bond
{"title":"环境危急","authors":"P. Bond","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630577.013.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essential dispute in global management of the Earth system is not whether planetary boundaries are being broached but whether it is appropriate to address these with managerialist strategies combining technical fixes and market mechanisms controlled by banks and corporations—as opposed to firm state regulatory mandates backed by tough civil society activism. Most of the attempts to “internalize market externalities” follow a trajectory of ecological modernization in analysis and policy, which abstracts from the dynamics of capital accumulation and the operation of power relations within multilateral governance. A theoretical framing (as developed by Marx, Luxemburg, and Harvey) assists in locating the wellsprings of ecological destruction, given the limits to strategies based on spatial, temporal, and capitalist/non-capitalist displacement of the underlying crisis tendencies. Many alternative discourses have emerged as a result of these obvious limitations in mainstream analysis and global governance strategies, to which global studies will increasingly contribute.","PeriodicalId":426590,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Critique\",\"authors\":\"P. Bond\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630577.013.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essential dispute in global management of the Earth system is not whether planetary boundaries are being broached but whether it is appropriate to address these with managerialist strategies combining technical fixes and market mechanisms controlled by banks and corporations—as opposed to firm state regulatory mandates backed by tough civil society activism. Most of the attempts to “internalize market externalities” follow a trajectory of ecological modernization in analysis and policy, which abstracts from the dynamics of capital accumulation and the operation of power relations within multilateral governance. A theoretical framing (as developed by Marx, Luxemburg, and Harvey) assists in locating the wellsprings of ecological destruction, given the limits to strategies based on spatial, temporal, and capitalist/non-capitalist displacement of the underlying crisis tendencies. Many alternative discourses have emerged as a result of these obvious limitations in mainstream analysis and global governance strategies, to which global studies will increasingly contribute.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630577.013.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630577.013.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在地球系统的全球管理中,最重要的争论不在于是否触及了地球边界,而在于用管理主义的策略来解决这些问题是否合适,这种策略结合了技术修复和由银行和公司控制的市场机制,而不是由强硬的公民社会行动主义支持的坚定的国家监管命令。大多数“市场外部性内部化”的尝试在分析和政策上遵循生态现代化的轨迹,抽象了多边治理中资本积累的动态和权力关系的运作。一个理论框架(由马克思、卢森堡和哈维开发)有助于定位生态破坏的源头,考虑到基于空间、时间和资本主义/非资本主义对潜在危机趋势的转移的策略的局限性。由于主流分析和全球治理战略的这些明显限制,许多替代话语已经出现,全球研究将越来越多地为此做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Critique
The essential dispute in global management of the Earth system is not whether planetary boundaries are being broached but whether it is appropriate to address these with managerialist strategies combining technical fixes and market mechanisms controlled by banks and corporations—as opposed to firm state regulatory mandates backed by tough civil society activism. Most of the attempts to “internalize market externalities” follow a trajectory of ecological modernization in analysis and policy, which abstracts from the dynamics of capital accumulation and the operation of power relations within multilateral governance. A theoretical framing (as developed by Marx, Luxemburg, and Harvey) assists in locating the wellsprings of ecological destruction, given the limits to strategies based on spatial, temporal, and capitalist/non-capitalist displacement of the underlying crisis tendencies. Many alternative discourses have emerged as a result of these obvious limitations in mainstream analysis and global governance strategies, to which global studies will increasingly contribute.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信