欧洲统一和欧洲一体化作为一种哲学原则

Bogdan Ghidirmic, Alexandru Matei
{"title":"欧洲统一和欧洲一体化作为一种哲学原则","authors":"Bogdan Ghidirmic, Alexandru Matei","doi":"10.14505//TPREF.V10.2(20).09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the mentioned coordinates of the European studies, the European unification is an attempt to establish a conceptual, philosophical framework for these studies, oriented, according to their stage, towards the fundamental aspects: the specificity of Europe and the European crisis; European unification; the cardinal philosophical problems of European unification and the resistance it faces. Using disciplinary approaches (economics, political science, sociology, history, etc.), she seeks to clear the philosophical side and support it, away from the positivist rendering of what is, but also from the usual slip in generalizations without sufficient basis, which is encouraged by generous topics, which are in public controversy.","PeriodicalId":362173,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EUROPEAN UNIFICATION AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AS A PHILOSOPHICAL PRINCIPLE\",\"authors\":\"Bogdan Ghidirmic, Alexandru Matei\",\"doi\":\"10.14505//TPREF.V10.2(20).09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the mentioned coordinates of the European studies, the European unification is an attempt to establish a conceptual, philosophical framework for these studies, oriented, according to their stage, towards the fundamental aspects: the specificity of Europe and the European crisis; European unification; the cardinal philosophical problems of European unification and the resistance it faces. Using disciplinary approaches (economics, political science, sociology, history, etc.), she seeks to clear the philosophical side and support it, away from the positivist rendering of what is, but also from the usual slip in generalizations without sufficient basis, which is encouraged by generous topics, which are in public controversy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":362173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14505//TPREF.V10.2(20).09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14505//TPREF.V10.2(20).09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在上述欧洲研究的坐标中,欧洲统一是为这些研究建立一个概念的、哲学的框架的尝试,根据其所处的阶段,面向基本方面:欧洲的特殊性和欧洲危机;欧洲统一;欧洲统一的主要哲学问题及其面临的阻力。使用学科方法(经济学、政治学、社会学、历史学等),她试图清除哲学的一面并支持它,远离实证主义对现实的渲染,也远离通常在没有充分基础的情况下泛化的失误,这是由慷慨的话题所鼓励的,这是在公众争议中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EUROPEAN UNIFICATION AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AS A PHILOSOPHICAL PRINCIPLE
In the mentioned coordinates of the European studies, the European unification is an attempt to establish a conceptual, philosophical framework for these studies, oriented, according to their stage, towards the fundamental aspects: the specificity of Europe and the European crisis; European unification; the cardinal philosophical problems of European unification and the resistance it faces. Using disciplinary approaches (economics, political science, sociology, history, etc.), she seeks to clear the philosophical side and support it, away from the positivist rendering of what is, but also from the usual slip in generalizations without sufficient basis, which is encouraged by generous topics, which are in public controversy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信