奢侈品牌产品营销的选择性分销网络与亚马逊市场:米兰法院的Sisley诉亚马逊案

M. Giannino
{"title":"奢侈品牌产品营销的选择性分销网络与亚马逊市场:米兰法院的Sisley诉亚马逊案","authors":"M. Giannino","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3506834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By an interlocutory order the District Court of Milan found that putting on sale on an electronic marketplace branded luxury products according to selling modalities that differ from the qualitative standards that the supplier has imposed on the resellers admitted to the selective distribution network created for the marketing of those products amounts to a trademark infringement. The Court of Milan confirms that the existence of a lawful competition-compliant selective distribution system constitutes a legitimate reason for not applying the principle of exhaustion. And more importantly, for the first time in Italy, the Court of Milan expressly found that the online sale of branded luxury products in defiance of the selling conditions imposed by the head of a selective distribution network infringes the trademark rights of the latter on such products. This paper reviews the decision of the Court of Milan and gives an insight into its practical implications.","PeriodicalId":150569,"journal":{"name":"IO: Theory eJournal","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective Distribution Networks for the Marketing of Luxury Branded Products versus the Amazon Marketplace: The Sisley v Amazon Case before the Court of Milan\",\"authors\":\"M. Giannino\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3506834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By an interlocutory order the District Court of Milan found that putting on sale on an electronic marketplace branded luxury products according to selling modalities that differ from the qualitative standards that the supplier has imposed on the resellers admitted to the selective distribution network created for the marketing of those products amounts to a trademark infringement. The Court of Milan confirms that the existence of a lawful competition-compliant selective distribution system constitutes a legitimate reason for not applying the principle of exhaustion. And more importantly, for the first time in Italy, the Court of Milan expressly found that the online sale of branded luxury products in defiance of the selling conditions imposed by the head of a selective distribution network infringes the trademark rights of the latter on such products. This paper reviews the decision of the Court of Milan and gives an insight into its practical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3506834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3506834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

米兰地方法院通过一项中间裁决发现,在电子市场上销售品牌奢侈品,其销售方式不同于供应商对进入选择性分销网络的经销商施加的质量标准,构成商标侵权。米兰法院确认,合法的符合竞争的选择性分配制度的存在构成不适用权利用尽原则的正当理由。更重要的是,米兰法院在意大利首次明确认定,在网上销售品牌奢侈品的行为违反了选择性分销网络负责人所规定的销售条件,侵犯了后者对该产品的商标权。本文回顾了米兰法院的判决,并对其现实意义进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective Distribution Networks for the Marketing of Luxury Branded Products versus the Amazon Marketplace: The Sisley v Amazon Case before the Court of Milan
By an interlocutory order the District Court of Milan found that putting on sale on an electronic marketplace branded luxury products according to selling modalities that differ from the qualitative standards that the supplier has imposed on the resellers admitted to the selective distribution network created for the marketing of those products amounts to a trademark infringement. The Court of Milan confirms that the existence of a lawful competition-compliant selective distribution system constitutes a legitimate reason for not applying the principle of exhaustion. And more importantly, for the first time in Italy, the Court of Milan expressly found that the online sale of branded luxury products in defiance of the selling conditions imposed by the head of a selective distribution network infringes the trademark rights of the latter on such products. This paper reviews the decision of the Court of Milan and gives an insight into its practical implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信