白细胞酯酶试纸在自发性细菌性腹膜炎床边快速诊断中的作用

Sumairaa Ashai, S. Ashraf, M. Srivastava
{"title":"白细胞酯酶试纸在自发性细菌性腹膜炎床边快速诊断中的作用","authors":"Sumairaa Ashai, S. Ashraf, M. Srivastava","doi":"10.37881/1.713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the dipstick in the rapid bedside diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and avoid delay in initiation of antibiotic therapy and evaluate the prevalence of SBP by a conventional method. \nMethods: A prospective analysis was done on inpatients and OPD patients with cirrhotic ascites at Jaipur Golden Hospital Delhi, India. The study included 110 consecutive patients with cirrhotic ascites. The patients were divided into 2 groups those with the polymorph nuclear leucocytes (PMNs) >250/mm3 on cell count (positive result) and those with PMNs <250/mm3 (Negative results) and were then compared to the dipstick results. The results were used to find the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the rapid dipstick method for the diagnosis of SBP. In addition, the data was used to calculate the prevalence of SBP in our hospital. \nResults: A total number of 110 patients with cirrhotic ascites were studied who were presented to the Jaipur Golden Hospital, New Delhi, India with the complaint of abdominal distension. A total of 20 patients were diagnosed with SBP by the manual cell count method which is considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of SBP, and 90 patients were diagnosed as non-SBP. We re-diagnosed these 20 patients with SBP with a dipstick method, the dipstick method showed a positive result for 18 patients (90%) and a negative result for 2 patients (10%). \nConclusion: In the SBP group, the dipstick showed 18 true positives and 2 false negatives. In the non-SBP group of 90 patients, the dipstick method showed negative results in all the patients with no positive results. Thus, the dipstick showed 100% true negatives with 0% false positives. The prevalence of SBP in patients with cirrhotic ascites in a hospital was found at 18.2%.","PeriodicalId":383954,"journal":{"name":"NeuroPharmac Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Dipstick (Leucocyte Esterase Reagent Strips) in the Rapid Bedside Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis\",\"authors\":\"Sumairaa Ashai, S. Ashraf, M. Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.37881/1.713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the dipstick in the rapid bedside diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and avoid delay in initiation of antibiotic therapy and evaluate the prevalence of SBP by a conventional method. \\nMethods: A prospective analysis was done on inpatients and OPD patients with cirrhotic ascites at Jaipur Golden Hospital Delhi, India. The study included 110 consecutive patients with cirrhotic ascites. The patients were divided into 2 groups those with the polymorph nuclear leucocytes (PMNs) >250/mm3 on cell count (positive result) and those with PMNs <250/mm3 (Negative results) and were then compared to the dipstick results. The results were used to find the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the rapid dipstick method for the diagnosis of SBP. In addition, the data was used to calculate the prevalence of SBP in our hospital. \\nResults: A total number of 110 patients with cirrhotic ascites were studied who were presented to the Jaipur Golden Hospital, New Delhi, India with the complaint of abdominal distension. A total of 20 patients were diagnosed with SBP by the manual cell count method which is considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of SBP, and 90 patients were diagnosed as non-SBP. We re-diagnosed these 20 patients with SBP with a dipstick method, the dipstick method showed a positive result for 18 patients (90%) and a negative result for 2 patients (10%). \\nConclusion: In the SBP group, the dipstick showed 18 true positives and 2 false negatives. In the non-SBP group of 90 patients, the dipstick method showed negative results in all the patients with no positive results. Thus, the dipstick showed 100% true negatives with 0% false positives. The prevalence of SBP in patients with cirrhotic ascites in a hospital was found at 18.2%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroPharmac Journal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroPharmac Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37881/1.713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroPharmac Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37881/1.713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价试纸在床边快速诊断自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)中的应用价值,避免延迟抗生素的起始治疗,以常规方法评估SBP的患病率。方法:对印度德里斋浦尔黄金医院住院和门诊的肝硬化腹水患者进行前瞻性分析。该研究纳入了110例连续的肝硬化腹水患者。将多态核白细胞(PMNs)计数为250/mm3(阳性结果)和PMNs <250/mm3(阴性结果)两组患者与试纸结果进行比较。目的探讨快速试纸法诊断收缩压的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。此外,还利用这些数据计算了我院收缩压的患病率。结果:我们研究了110例以腹胀为主诉来到印度新德里斋浦尔黄金医院的肝硬化腹水患者。人工细胞计数法被认为是SBP诊断的金标准,共20例患者被诊断为SBP, 90例患者被诊断为非SBP。我们用量尺法对这20例患者进行了再次诊断,其中18例(90%)为阳性,2例(10%)为阴性。结论:收缩压组试纸真阳性18例,假阴性2例。非收缩压组90例患者,试纸法均为阴性,无阳性结果。因此,试纸显示100%的真阴性和0%的假阳性。某医院肝硬化腹水患者的收缩压患病率为18.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Dipstick (Leucocyte Esterase Reagent Strips) in the Rapid Bedside Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Objectives: To evaluate the dipstick in the rapid bedside diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and avoid delay in initiation of antibiotic therapy and evaluate the prevalence of SBP by a conventional method. Methods: A prospective analysis was done on inpatients and OPD patients with cirrhotic ascites at Jaipur Golden Hospital Delhi, India. The study included 110 consecutive patients with cirrhotic ascites. The patients were divided into 2 groups those with the polymorph nuclear leucocytes (PMNs) >250/mm3 on cell count (positive result) and those with PMNs <250/mm3 (Negative results) and were then compared to the dipstick results. The results were used to find the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the rapid dipstick method for the diagnosis of SBP. In addition, the data was used to calculate the prevalence of SBP in our hospital. Results: A total number of 110 patients with cirrhotic ascites were studied who were presented to the Jaipur Golden Hospital, New Delhi, India with the complaint of abdominal distension. A total of 20 patients were diagnosed with SBP by the manual cell count method which is considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of SBP, and 90 patients were diagnosed as non-SBP. We re-diagnosed these 20 patients with SBP with a dipstick method, the dipstick method showed a positive result for 18 patients (90%) and a negative result for 2 patients (10%). Conclusion: In the SBP group, the dipstick showed 18 true positives and 2 false negatives. In the non-SBP group of 90 patients, the dipstick method showed negative results in all the patients with no positive results. Thus, the dipstick showed 100% true negatives with 0% false positives. The prevalence of SBP in patients with cirrhotic ascites in a hospital was found at 18.2%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信