探索社会创业领域:新方向,少有人走过的路

A. Bruin, S. Teasdale
{"title":"探索社会创业领域:新方向,少有人走过的路","authors":"A. Bruin, S. Teasdale","doi":"10.4337/9781788972321.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of social entrepreneurship (SE) is reaching maturity (Sassmannshausen and Volkmann 2018). However, there remain numerous new directions and paths less travelled for exploring the varied and complex SE terrain. This book draws together sixteen chapter contributions from developing paths of the SE field, to sign-post directions ahead. In this chapter we integrate and build on these rich insights, paving the way for a future research agenda to advance the maturing SE field. While some scholars suggest that mainstream entrepreneurship theories are suffi-cient to explain SE (Dacin et al. 2010), the field has been enriched by the application of different disciplinary approaches including management, public administration, economics, sociology, public health, and development studies. Up to this point methods have been predominately qualitative, arguably reflecting what a decade ago was characterised as a ‘pre-paradigmatic’ stage of field development (Nicholls 2010a), ranging from macro-studies of policy ecosystems to ethnographies. Economic theories have sought to SE while realist evaluations al. 2017) and systematic reviews 2018; Roy 2014) have been used to understand the impact of SE. Signs are emerging that scholars (and governments) are beginning to amass the datasets necessary for large-scale quantitative analysis While many authors use the terms social innovation, entrepreneurship and enterprise almost interchangeably, other scholars have focused on differentiating between them","PeriodicalId":313756,"journal":{"name":"A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the terrain of social entrepreneurship: new directions, paths less travelled\",\"authors\":\"A. Bruin, S. Teasdale\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781788972321.00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of social entrepreneurship (SE) is reaching maturity (Sassmannshausen and Volkmann 2018). However, there remain numerous new directions and paths less travelled for exploring the varied and complex SE terrain. This book draws together sixteen chapter contributions from developing paths of the SE field, to sign-post directions ahead. In this chapter we integrate and build on these rich insights, paving the way for a future research agenda to advance the maturing SE field. While some scholars suggest that mainstream entrepreneurship theories are suffi-cient to explain SE (Dacin et al. 2010), the field has been enriched by the application of different disciplinary approaches including management, public administration, economics, sociology, public health, and development studies. Up to this point methods have been predominately qualitative, arguably reflecting what a decade ago was characterised as a ‘pre-paradigmatic’ stage of field development (Nicholls 2010a), ranging from macro-studies of policy ecosystems to ethnographies. Economic theories have sought to SE while realist evaluations al. 2017) and systematic reviews 2018; Roy 2014) have been used to understand the impact of SE. Signs are emerging that scholars (and governments) are beginning to amass the datasets necessary for large-scale quantitative analysis While many authors use the terms social innovation, entrepreneurship and enterprise almost interchangeably, other scholars have focused on differentiating between them\",\"PeriodicalId\":313756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\"219 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972321.00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972321.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

社会创业(SE)领域正在走向成熟(Sassmannshausen and Volkmann 2018)。然而,仍然有许多新的方向和路径,探索多样化和复杂的东南地形。这本书汇集了16章的贡献,从发展路径的SE领域,以路标路标的方向前进。在本章中,我们将整合并建立这些丰富的见解,为未来的研究议程铺平道路,以推进成熟的SE领域。虽然一些学者认为主流创业理论足以解释社会创业(Dacin et al. 2010),但由于管理学、公共行政学、经济学、社会学、公共卫生和发展研究等不同学科方法的应用,这一领域得到了丰富。到目前为止,方法主要是定性的,可以说反映了十年前被描述为实地发展的“前范式”阶段(Nicholls 2010a),范围从政策生态系统的宏观研究到民族志。经济理论在现实主义评估(2017)和系统评估(2018)中寻求SE;Roy 2014)被用来理解SE的影响。有迹象表明,学者(和政府)开始收集大规模定量分析所需的数据集。虽然许多作者几乎可以互换使用社会创新、企业家精神和企业这三个术语,但其他学者则专注于区分它们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the terrain of social entrepreneurship: new directions, paths less travelled
The field of social entrepreneurship (SE) is reaching maturity (Sassmannshausen and Volkmann 2018). However, there remain numerous new directions and paths less travelled for exploring the varied and complex SE terrain. This book draws together sixteen chapter contributions from developing paths of the SE field, to sign-post directions ahead. In this chapter we integrate and build on these rich insights, paving the way for a future research agenda to advance the maturing SE field. While some scholars suggest that mainstream entrepreneurship theories are suffi-cient to explain SE (Dacin et al. 2010), the field has been enriched by the application of different disciplinary approaches including management, public administration, economics, sociology, public health, and development studies. Up to this point methods have been predominately qualitative, arguably reflecting what a decade ago was characterised as a ‘pre-paradigmatic’ stage of field development (Nicholls 2010a), ranging from macro-studies of policy ecosystems to ethnographies. Economic theories have sought to SE while realist evaluations al. 2017) and systematic reviews 2018; Roy 2014) have been used to understand the impact of SE. Signs are emerging that scholars (and governments) are beginning to amass the datasets necessary for large-scale quantitative analysis While many authors use the terms social innovation, entrepreneurship and enterprise almost interchangeably, other scholars have focused on differentiating between them
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信