在学校科学教科书中,语境化有什么主流的理论框架吗?

Mayara Palmieri, Daniel Trugillo Martins Fontes, A. Rodrigues
{"title":"在学校科学教科书中,语境化有什么主流的理论框架吗?","authors":"Mayara Palmieri, Daniel Trugillo Martins Fontes, A. Rodrigues","doi":"10.46328/ijses.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work we tackled the question of whether research articles that analyze school science textbooks are theoretically grounded when considering contextualization. To answer this question we conducted a systematic literature review of the formulations of the notion of contextualization developed in scientific research that analyze science textbooks. For the selection of journals, we used the information available in Brazilian Qualis Journals, rated A1 or A2 in the Teaching area, which has Science Teaching as their scope. The research resulted in a sample of 48 articles between 2004 and 2021. The methodological framework was based on content analysis. Among the results, we highlight five different contextualization approaches in research articles that analyze textbooks. Furthermore, we notice that the contextualization perspective is not conceptualized in any predominant theoretical framework, either in official documents or academic literature. This work offers a basis for understanding how Brazilian Common National Basis (BNCC) will influence contextualization perspectives and its reflection in academic literature.","PeriodicalId":329404,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Studies in Education and Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there any Dominant Theoretical Frameworks for Contextualization in School Science Textbooks?\",\"authors\":\"Mayara Palmieri, Daniel Trugillo Martins Fontes, A. Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.46328/ijses.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work we tackled the question of whether research articles that analyze school science textbooks are theoretically grounded when considering contextualization. To answer this question we conducted a systematic literature review of the formulations of the notion of contextualization developed in scientific research that analyze science textbooks. For the selection of journals, we used the information available in Brazilian Qualis Journals, rated A1 or A2 in the Teaching area, which has Science Teaching as their scope. The research resulted in a sample of 48 articles between 2004 and 2021. The methodological framework was based on content analysis. Among the results, we highlight five different contextualization approaches in research articles that analyze textbooks. Furthermore, we notice that the contextualization perspective is not conceptualized in any predominant theoretical framework, either in official documents or academic literature. This work offers a basis for understanding how Brazilian Common National Basis (BNCC) will influence contextualization perspectives and its reflection in academic literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Studies in Education and Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Studies in Education and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Studies in Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们解决了分析学校科学教科书的研究文章在考虑情境化时是否具有理论基础的问题。为了回答这个问题,我们对分析科学教科书的科学研究中发展起来的语境化概念的表述进行了系统的文献回顾。对于期刊的选择,我们使用了巴西Qualis期刊提供的信息,这些期刊在教学领域被评为A1或A2,其中科学教学是他们的范围。这项研究的样本是2004年至2021年间的48篇文章。方法框架以内容分析为基础。在研究结果中,我们强调了分析教科书的研究文章中五种不同的语境化方法。此外,我们注意到,无论是在官方文件还是学术文献中,语境化视角都没有在任何主流理论框架中概念化。这项工作为理解巴西共同国家基础(BNCC)如何影响语境化观点及其在学术文献中的反映提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are there any Dominant Theoretical Frameworks for Contextualization in School Science Textbooks?
In this work we tackled the question of whether research articles that analyze school science textbooks are theoretically grounded when considering contextualization. To answer this question we conducted a systematic literature review of the formulations of the notion of contextualization developed in scientific research that analyze science textbooks. For the selection of journals, we used the information available in Brazilian Qualis Journals, rated A1 or A2 in the Teaching area, which has Science Teaching as their scope. The research resulted in a sample of 48 articles between 2004 and 2021. The methodological framework was based on content analysis. Among the results, we highlight five different contextualization approaches in research articles that analyze textbooks. Furthermore, we notice that the contextualization perspective is not conceptualized in any predominant theoretical framework, either in official documents or academic literature. This work offers a basis for understanding how Brazilian Common National Basis (BNCC) will influence contextualization perspectives and its reflection in academic literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信