I. Berdnikov, O. Goriunova, A. G. Novikov, N. Berdnikova, I. Ulanov, N. B. Sokolova, M. E. Abrashina, K. Krutikova, E. O. Rogovskoi, D. Lokhov, S. Kogai
{"title":"西伯利亚贝加尔湖-叶尼塞省新石器时代陶瓷年代学:基本观点和新资料","authors":"I. Berdnikov, O. Goriunova, A. G. Novikov, N. Berdnikova, I. Ulanov, N. B. Sokolova, M. E. Abrashina, K. Krutikova, E. O. Rogovskoi, D. Lokhov, S. Kogai","doi":"10.26516/2227-2380.2020.33.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two main research areas in the Neolithic studies of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia. One of them relates to research of mortuary traditions, another with a research of hunter-gatherer’s campsites. Ceramics is of the greatest importance for the cultural identification of campsites complexes. As a result of the Canadian-Russian project, for the Neolithic burials a clear chronological model based on AMS radiocarbon dates corrected for the freshwater reservoir effect (FRE) was created. There are several hypotheses for ceramic complexes that were proposed, but all of them predominantly were based on the radiocarbon dates obtained by the liquid scintillation counting method. This data cannot be admitted as reliable because of the limitation of this method, the big root-mean-square deviation, and the lack of data on stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes. Over the past few years, we have received in the Keck-CCAMS Group and Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit laboratories 35 new AMS-radiocarbon dates for the complexes with Neolithic ceramics. Samples taken for analyses were obtained from the 14 multilayered sites of the Angara region, Tunka valley, and Lake Baikal coast. They are represented by fragments of teeth, bones, and horns of the mammals (predominantly Cervidae and large ungulates) that accompanied pottery in cultural horizons. In five cases the carbonized organic residues (foodcrusts) from the inner surface of ceramic vessels were used as samples. In one more case, it was a strong humified soil cleaned from impurities. The technical assessment of the reliability of all dates was provided. The definitions obtained for faunal remains look the most correct. Dates obtained for foodcrust are likely significantly older, because of possible FRE influence. The geoarchaeological assessment of new dates and their correlation with the most reliable dates of previous years is provided. Based on the AMC-dating, the following chronometric frames for the Neolithic pottery of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia are offered: Early Neolithic Net-impressed and the Khaita ceramics in the Angara region – 8539–6914 cal BP, on the Lake Baikal coast – 8160–6960 cal BP, in the Tunka valley – 7843–7681 cal BP; Ust-Belaya ceramics in the Northern Angara region – 7421–7014 cal BP (perhaps the real age is younger), in the Southern Angara region – 6730–6306 cal BP; Posolskaya ceramics on the Lake Baikal coast – 6750–6300 cal BP, in the Southern Angara region – 6730–6306 cal BP; Serovo and Dotted-comb ceramics on the Lake Baikal coast – 5841–4620 cal BP.","PeriodicalId":220135,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronology of the Neolithic Ceramics of Baikal-Yenisei Siberia: Basic Ideas and New Data\",\"authors\":\"I. Berdnikov, O. Goriunova, A. G. Novikov, N. Berdnikova, I. Ulanov, N. B. Sokolova, M. E. Abrashina, K. Krutikova, E. O. Rogovskoi, D. Lokhov, S. Kogai\",\"doi\":\"10.26516/2227-2380.2020.33.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two main research areas in the Neolithic studies of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia. One of them relates to research of mortuary traditions, another with a research of hunter-gatherer’s campsites. Ceramics is of the greatest importance for the cultural identification of campsites complexes. As a result of the Canadian-Russian project, for the Neolithic burials a clear chronological model based on AMS radiocarbon dates corrected for the freshwater reservoir effect (FRE) was created. There are several hypotheses for ceramic complexes that were proposed, but all of them predominantly were based on the radiocarbon dates obtained by the liquid scintillation counting method. This data cannot be admitted as reliable because of the limitation of this method, the big root-mean-square deviation, and the lack of data on stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes. Over the past few years, we have received in the Keck-CCAMS Group and Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit laboratories 35 new AMS-radiocarbon dates for the complexes with Neolithic ceramics. Samples taken for analyses were obtained from the 14 multilayered sites of the Angara region, Tunka valley, and Lake Baikal coast. They are represented by fragments of teeth, bones, and horns of the mammals (predominantly Cervidae and large ungulates) that accompanied pottery in cultural horizons. In five cases the carbonized organic residues (foodcrusts) from the inner surface of ceramic vessels were used as samples. In one more case, it was a strong humified soil cleaned from impurities. The technical assessment of the reliability of all dates was provided. The definitions obtained for faunal remains look the most correct. Dates obtained for foodcrust are likely significantly older, because of possible FRE influence. The geoarchaeological assessment of new dates and their correlation with the most reliable dates of previous years is provided. Based on the AMC-dating, the following chronometric frames for the Neolithic pottery of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia are offered: Early Neolithic Net-impressed and the Khaita ceramics in the Angara region – 8539–6914 cal BP, on the Lake Baikal coast – 8160–6960 cal BP, in the Tunka valley – 7843–7681 cal BP; Ust-Belaya ceramics in the Northern Angara region – 7421–7014 cal BP (perhaps the real age is younger), in the Southern Angara region – 6730–6306 cal BP; Posolskaya ceramics on the Lake Baikal coast – 6750–6300 cal BP, in the Southern Angara region – 6730–6306 cal BP; Serovo and Dotted-comb ceramics on the Lake Baikal coast – 5841–4620 cal BP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2020.33.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2227-2380.2020.33.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
贝加尔湖-叶尼塞西伯利亚地区新石器时代研究主要分为两个领域。其中一项与殡葬传统的研究有关,另一项与狩猎采集者营地的研究有关。陶瓷对于营地建筑群的文化识别是最重要的。加拿大-俄罗斯项目的结果是,基于AMS放射性碳测年修正了淡水水库效应(FRE),为新石器时代的墓葬创建了一个明确的年代模型。对陶瓷配合物提出了几种假设,但主要都是基于液体闪烁计数法获得的放射性碳年代。由于该方法的局限性,均方根偏差大,以及缺乏稳定的碳和氮同位素数据,这些数据不能被认为是可靠的。在过去的几年中,我们在kek - ccams小组和牛津放射性碳加速器单元实验室收到了35个新的ams放射性碳日期,用于与新石器时代陶瓷配合物的测定。用于分析的样本来自安加拉地区、通卡山谷和贝加尔湖沿岸的14个多层遗址。它们由与陶器一起出现在文化视野中的哺乳动物(主要是鹿科动物和大型有蹄类动物)的牙齿、骨头和角的碎片代表。在五个案例中,以陶瓷容器内表面的碳化有机残留物(食物结壳)作为样品。在另一个案例中,这是一种清除了杂质的强腐殖质土壤。对所有日期的可靠性进行了技术评估。动物类遗骸的定义看起来是最正确的。由于可能受到FRE的影响,获得的食物外壳日期可能要老得多。提供了对新日期的地质考古评估及其与前几年最可靠日期的相关性。在此基础上,对西伯利亚贝加尔湖—叶尼塞地区新石器时代陶器的年代框架进行了划分:安加拉地区(8539 ~ 6914 cal BP)新石器时代早期的网印陶器和海塔陶器(8160 ~ 6960 cal BP),贝加尔湖沿岸(7843 ~ 7681 cal BP);北安加拉地区的Ust-Belaya陶瓷- 7421-7014 cal BP(可能实际年龄更小),南安加拉地区- 6730-6306 cal BP;贝加尔湖沿岸的Posolskaya陶瓷- 6750-6300 cal BP,在南安加拉地区- 6730-6306 cal BP;在贝加尔湖海岸- 5841-4620 cal BP的锯齿状和点梳状陶瓷。
Chronology of the Neolithic Ceramics of Baikal-Yenisei Siberia: Basic Ideas and New Data
There are two main research areas in the Neolithic studies of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia. One of them relates to research of mortuary traditions, another with a research of hunter-gatherer’s campsites. Ceramics is of the greatest importance for the cultural identification of campsites complexes. As a result of the Canadian-Russian project, for the Neolithic burials a clear chronological model based on AMS radiocarbon dates corrected for the freshwater reservoir effect (FRE) was created. There are several hypotheses for ceramic complexes that were proposed, but all of them predominantly were based on the radiocarbon dates obtained by the liquid scintillation counting method. This data cannot be admitted as reliable because of the limitation of this method, the big root-mean-square deviation, and the lack of data on stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes. Over the past few years, we have received in the Keck-CCAMS Group and Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit laboratories 35 new AMS-radiocarbon dates for the complexes with Neolithic ceramics. Samples taken for analyses were obtained from the 14 multilayered sites of the Angara region, Tunka valley, and Lake Baikal coast. They are represented by fragments of teeth, bones, and horns of the mammals (predominantly Cervidae and large ungulates) that accompanied pottery in cultural horizons. In five cases the carbonized organic residues (foodcrusts) from the inner surface of ceramic vessels were used as samples. In one more case, it was a strong humified soil cleaned from impurities. The technical assessment of the reliability of all dates was provided. The definitions obtained for faunal remains look the most correct. Dates obtained for foodcrust are likely significantly older, because of possible FRE influence. The geoarchaeological assessment of new dates and their correlation with the most reliable dates of previous years is provided. Based on the AMC-dating, the following chronometric frames for the Neolithic pottery of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia are offered: Early Neolithic Net-impressed and the Khaita ceramics in the Angara region – 8539–6914 cal BP, on the Lake Baikal coast – 8160–6960 cal BP, in the Tunka valley – 7843–7681 cal BP; Ust-Belaya ceramics in the Northern Angara region – 7421–7014 cal BP (perhaps the real age is younger), in the Southern Angara region – 6730–6306 cal BP; Posolskaya ceramics on the Lake Baikal coast – 6750–6300 cal BP, in the Southern Angara region – 6730–6306 cal BP; Serovo and Dotted-comb ceramics on the Lake Baikal coast – 5841–4620 cal BP.