驾驶世界上最昂贵汽车的沉没成本谬误

Teck-Hua Ho, I. Png, Sadat Reza
{"title":"驾驶世界上最昂贵汽车的沉没成本谬误","authors":"Teck-Hua Ho, I. Png, Sadat Reza","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a behavioral model of durable good usage with mental accounting for sunk costs. It predicts higher-than-rational usage that attenuates at a rate that increases with sunk costs. Singapore government policy varied the sunk cost of buying a new car. Using Singapore data, we estimate the elasticity of driving with respect to sunk costs to be 0.048, which implies that government policy between 2009 and 2013 was associated with 86 kilometers per month, or 5.6%, more driving. The results are robust to specifying sunk costs as relative to buyer income and estimation with Hong Kong data. We believe this to be the first field evidence of the sunk cost fallacy in usage of a major durable good. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651. This paper was accepted by John List, behavioral economics.","PeriodicalId":352857,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Other Investment Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sunk Cost Fallacy in Driving the World’s Costliest Cars\",\"authors\":\"Teck-Hua Ho, I. Png, Sadat Reza\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We develop a behavioral model of durable good usage with mental accounting for sunk costs. It predicts higher-than-rational usage that attenuates at a rate that increases with sunk costs. Singapore government policy varied the sunk cost of buying a new car. Using Singapore data, we estimate the elasticity of driving with respect to sunk costs to be 0.048, which implies that government policy between 2009 and 2013 was associated with 86 kilometers per month, or 5.6%, more driving. The results are robust to specifying sunk costs as relative to buyer income and estimation with Hong Kong data. We believe this to be the first field evidence of the sunk cost fallacy in usage of a major durable good. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651. This paper was accepted by John List, behavioral economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DecisionSciRN: Other Investment Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DecisionSciRN: Other Investment Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Other Investment Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

我们开发了一个持久良好使用的行为模型,并对沉没成本进行了心理核算。它预测,高于理性的用电量会随着沉没成本的增加而衰减。新加坡政府的政策改变了购买新车的沉没成本。使用新加坡的数据,我们估计驾驶弹性相对于沉没成本为0.048,这意味着2009年至2013年的政府政策与每月86公里或5.6%的驾驶增加有关。这些结果对于确定沉没成本相对于买家收入和香港数据的估计是可靠的。我们认为,这是在使用一种主要耐用品时沉没成本谬误的第一个实地证据。在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651上获得。这篇论文被行为经济学家John List接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sunk Cost Fallacy in Driving the World’s Costliest Cars
We develop a behavioral model of durable good usage with mental accounting for sunk costs. It predicts higher-than-rational usage that attenuates at a rate that increases with sunk costs. Singapore government policy varied the sunk cost of buying a new car. Using Singapore data, we estimate the elasticity of driving with respect to sunk costs to be 0.048, which implies that government policy between 2009 and 2013 was associated with 86 kilometers per month, or 5.6%, more driving. The results are robust to specifying sunk costs as relative to buyer income and estimation with Hong Kong data. We believe this to be the first field evidence of the sunk cost fallacy in usage of a major durable good. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651. This paper was accepted by John List, behavioral economics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信