改进可测试性分析的新技术

Yin-He Su, Ching-Hwa Cheng, Shih-Chieh Chang
{"title":"改进可测试性分析的新技术","authors":"Yin-He Su, Ching-Hwa Cheng, Shih-Chieh Chang","doi":"10.1109/ATS.2000.893655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of a testability analysis program is to estimate the difficulty of testing a fault. A good measurement can give an early warning about the testing problem so as to provide guidance in improving the testability of a circuit. There have been researches attempting to efficiently compute the testability analysis. Among those, the Controllability and Observability Procedure COP (1984) can calculate the testability value of a stuck-at fault efficiently in a tree-structured circuit but may be very inaccurate for a general circuit. The inaccuracy in COP is due to the ignorance of signal correlations. The algorithm of TAIR (Testability Analysis by Implication Reasoning) proposes a testability analysis algorithm, which starts from the result of COP and then gradually improves the result by applying a set of rules. The set of rules in TAIR can capture some signal correlations and therefore the results of TAIR are more accurate than COP. In this paper, we first prove that the rules in TAIR can be replaced by a closed-form formulation. Then, based on the closed-form formulation, we proposed two novel techniques to further improve the testability analysis results. Our experimental results have shown improvement over the results of TAIR.","PeriodicalId":403864,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Ninth Asian Test Symposium","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel techniques for improving testability analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yin-He Su, Ching-Hwa Cheng, Shih-Chieh Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATS.2000.893655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of a testability analysis program is to estimate the difficulty of testing a fault. A good measurement can give an early warning about the testing problem so as to provide guidance in improving the testability of a circuit. There have been researches attempting to efficiently compute the testability analysis. Among those, the Controllability and Observability Procedure COP (1984) can calculate the testability value of a stuck-at fault efficiently in a tree-structured circuit but may be very inaccurate for a general circuit. The inaccuracy in COP is due to the ignorance of signal correlations. The algorithm of TAIR (Testability Analysis by Implication Reasoning) proposes a testability analysis algorithm, which starts from the result of COP and then gradually improves the result by applying a set of rules. The set of rules in TAIR can capture some signal correlations and therefore the results of TAIR are more accurate than COP. In this paper, we first prove that the rules in TAIR can be replaced by a closed-form formulation. Then, based on the closed-form formulation, we proposed two novel techniques to further improve the testability analysis results. Our experimental results have shown improvement over the results of TAIR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Ninth Asian Test Symposium\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Ninth Asian Test Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.2000.893655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Ninth Asian Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.2000.893655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

可测试性分析程序的目的是估计测试故障的难度。良好的测量可以对测试问题进行预警,从而为提高电路的可测试性提供指导。人们一直在研究如何有效地计算可测试性分析。其中,COP(1984)的可控性和可观测性程序可以有效地计算出树状电路中卡在故障的可测性值,但对于一般电路来说,可测性值可能非常不准确。COP的不准确是由于忽略了信号的相关性。TAIR (Testability Analysis by implied Reasoning)算法提出了一种从COP结果出发,通过应用一组规则逐步改进结果的可测性分析算法。TAIR中的规则集可以捕获一些信号相关性,因此TAIR的结果比COP更准确。在本文中,我们首先证明了TAIR中的规则可以被一个封闭形式的公式所取代。然后,在封闭公式的基础上,提出了两种新的技术来进一步改善可测性分析结果。我们的实验结果比TAIR的结果有了改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel techniques for improving testability analysis
The purpose of a testability analysis program is to estimate the difficulty of testing a fault. A good measurement can give an early warning about the testing problem so as to provide guidance in improving the testability of a circuit. There have been researches attempting to efficiently compute the testability analysis. Among those, the Controllability and Observability Procedure COP (1984) can calculate the testability value of a stuck-at fault efficiently in a tree-structured circuit but may be very inaccurate for a general circuit. The inaccuracy in COP is due to the ignorance of signal correlations. The algorithm of TAIR (Testability Analysis by Implication Reasoning) proposes a testability analysis algorithm, which starts from the result of COP and then gradually improves the result by applying a set of rules. The set of rules in TAIR can capture some signal correlations and therefore the results of TAIR are more accurate than COP. In this paper, we first prove that the rules in TAIR can be replaced by a closed-form formulation. Then, based on the closed-form formulation, we proposed two novel techniques to further improve the testability analysis results. Our experimental results have shown improvement over the results of TAIR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信