热导率测量用3ω法和扫描热显微镜

W. Jaber, A. Assy, S. Lefèvre, S. Gomés, P. Chapuis
{"title":"热导率测量用3ω法和扫描热显微镜","authors":"W. Jaber, A. Assy, S. Lefèvre, S. Gomés, P. Chapuis","doi":"10.1109/THERMINIC.2013.6675242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various techniques allow measuring the thermal conductivity of materials ranging from bulk to thin-film sizes. Among them, one can find the 3ω method, scanning thermal microscopy or Raman thermometry. The standard 3ω method is not spatially-resolved since it requires a long deposited metallic wire. It is also intrusive. In contrast, the two other techniques have spatial resolution ranging from few microns to submicronic one, depending on the conditions of operation. However, their sensitivity is altered by various parameters. For instance, scanning thermal microscopy signals depend strongly on the surface state. Here, by gathering results obtained with these techniques, we report on the comparison of the experimental determination of the thermal conductivity of various silicon-based and thermoelectric materials of strong interest for microelectronics. In particular, we highlight the evolution of the thermal conductivity with the temperature, which is customarily determined by the 3ω method. While it requires lithography, which can be considered as a drawback at first, the 3ω method is easier to use when varying the temperature. We conclude on the advantages and drawbacks of these techniques and provide a matrix of choices depending on the materials and conditions.","PeriodicalId":369128,"journal":{"name":"19th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal conductivity measurements with the 3ω method and scanning thermal microscopy\",\"authors\":\"W. Jaber, A. Assy, S. Lefèvre, S. Gomés, P. Chapuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/THERMINIC.2013.6675242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various techniques allow measuring the thermal conductivity of materials ranging from bulk to thin-film sizes. Among them, one can find the 3ω method, scanning thermal microscopy or Raman thermometry. The standard 3ω method is not spatially-resolved since it requires a long deposited metallic wire. It is also intrusive. In contrast, the two other techniques have spatial resolution ranging from few microns to submicronic one, depending on the conditions of operation. However, their sensitivity is altered by various parameters. For instance, scanning thermal microscopy signals depend strongly on the surface state. Here, by gathering results obtained with these techniques, we report on the comparison of the experimental determination of the thermal conductivity of various silicon-based and thermoelectric materials of strong interest for microelectronics. In particular, we highlight the evolution of the thermal conductivity with the temperature, which is customarily determined by the 3ω method. While it requires lithography, which can be considered as a drawback at first, the 3ω method is easier to use when varying the temperature. We conclude on the advantages and drawbacks of these techniques and provide a matrix of choices depending on the materials and conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"19th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"19th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/THERMINIC.2013.6675242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/THERMINIC.2013.6675242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

各种各样的技术可以测量从大块到薄膜大小的材料的热导率。其中,可以找到3ω法,扫描热显微镜或拉曼测温法。标准的3ω方法不是空间分辨的,因为它需要一个长沉积金属线。它也具有侵入性。相比之下,其他两种技术的空间分辨率范围从几微米到亚微米,具体取决于操作条件。然而,它们的灵敏度受到各种参数的影响。例如,扫描热显微镜的信号强烈依赖于表面状态。在这里,通过收集这些技术获得的结果,我们报告了对微电子学有强烈兴趣的各种硅基和热电材料的热导率的实验测定的比较。特别地,我们强调了导热系数随温度的演变,这通常是由3ω方法确定的。虽然它需要光刻,这在一开始可以被认为是一个缺点,但在改变温度时,3ω方法更容易使用。我们总结了这些技术的优点和缺点,并根据材料和条件提供了一个选择矩阵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermal conductivity measurements with the 3ω method and scanning thermal microscopy
Various techniques allow measuring the thermal conductivity of materials ranging from bulk to thin-film sizes. Among them, one can find the 3ω method, scanning thermal microscopy or Raman thermometry. The standard 3ω method is not spatially-resolved since it requires a long deposited metallic wire. It is also intrusive. In contrast, the two other techniques have spatial resolution ranging from few microns to submicronic one, depending on the conditions of operation. However, their sensitivity is altered by various parameters. For instance, scanning thermal microscopy signals depend strongly on the surface state. Here, by gathering results obtained with these techniques, we report on the comparison of the experimental determination of the thermal conductivity of various silicon-based and thermoelectric materials of strong interest for microelectronics. In particular, we highlight the evolution of the thermal conductivity with the temperature, which is customarily determined by the 3ω method. While it requires lithography, which can be considered as a drawback at first, the 3ω method is easier to use when varying the temperature. We conclude on the advantages and drawbacks of these techniques and provide a matrix of choices depending on the materials and conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信