沃尔姆斯编年史中的属格定义(十六世纪)

Arseny E. Dunaev
{"title":"沃尔姆斯编年史中的属格定义(十六世纪)","authors":"Arseny E. Dunaev","doi":"10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-2-14-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the essential issue of the historical stylistics of German the development of the \"nominal\" or \"substantive\" style in the Early Upper German period (XIV-XVII centuries). The research was based on the chronicle of Worms (XVI century) that represents one of the most popular genres of the period. The purpose of article is to analyze the topology and frequency of various types of genitive definitions of a noun in the text. We distributed nuclear nouns into seven semantic groups with a total number of examples of about 160. \nThe results obtained allow making following conclusions. The prepositive genitive prevails only in the groups of Nomina agentis and relational names. The connection between semantics and the topology of the genitive is hard to trace. Thus, the genitives of subject, object and possessive genitive are distributed between the pre- and postposition almost equally, with some preponderance of the latter. Genitivus definitivus and partitivus tend to postposition. With regards to parameters under consideration, the Worms chronicle corresponds to the general tendency in the XVI century, that is, to move genitive definitions into postposition.","PeriodicalId":337132,"journal":{"name":"Focus on Language Education and Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genitive definitions in the chronicle of Worms (XVI century)\",\"authors\":\"Arseny E. Dunaev\",\"doi\":\"10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-2-14-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the essential issue of the historical stylistics of German the development of the \\\"nominal\\\" or \\\"substantive\\\" style in the Early Upper German period (XIV-XVII centuries). The research was based on the chronicle of Worms (XVI century) that represents one of the most popular genres of the period. The purpose of article is to analyze the topology and frequency of various types of genitive definitions of a noun in the text. We distributed nuclear nouns into seven semantic groups with a total number of examples of about 160. \\nThe results obtained allow making following conclusions. The prepositive genitive prevails only in the groups of Nomina agentis and relational names. The connection between semantics and the topology of the genitive is hard to trace. Thus, the genitives of subject, object and possessive genitive are distributed between the pre- and postposition almost equally, with some preponderance of the latter. Genitivus definitivus and partitivus tend to postposition. With regards to parameters under consideration, the Worms chronicle corresponds to the general tendency in the XVI century, that is, to move genitive definitions into postposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus on Language Education and Research\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus on Language Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-2-14-21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on Language Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35213/2686-7516-2022-3-2-14-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于探讨德语历史文体学的基本问题,即早期上德意志时期(14 - 17世纪)“名义”或“实质”风格的发展。这项研究是基于16世纪的《蠕虫》编年史,它代表了当时最流行的流派之一。本文的目的是分析文本中名词的各种类型的属格定义的拓扑结构和频率。我们将核名词分成7个语义组,总共有160个例子。得到的结果可以得出以下结论。前置物主只在名义主体和关系名称组中使用。语义和属格拓扑之间的联系很难追踪。因此,主格、宾格和所有格的所有格在前置和后置之间的分布几乎是相等的,后者有一定的优势。定语和分词倾向于后置。关于所考虑的参数,沃尔姆斯编年史符合十六世纪的一般趋势,即将属格定义移到后置位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genitive definitions in the chronicle of Worms (XVI century)
The article is devoted to the essential issue of the historical stylistics of German the development of the "nominal" or "substantive" style in the Early Upper German period (XIV-XVII centuries). The research was based on the chronicle of Worms (XVI century) that represents one of the most popular genres of the period. The purpose of article is to analyze the topology and frequency of various types of genitive definitions of a noun in the text. We distributed nuclear nouns into seven semantic groups with a total number of examples of about 160. The results obtained allow making following conclusions. The prepositive genitive prevails only in the groups of Nomina agentis and relational names. The connection between semantics and the topology of the genitive is hard to trace. Thus, the genitives of subject, object and possessive genitive are distributed between the pre- and postposition almost equally, with some preponderance of the latter. Genitivus definitivus and partitivus tend to postposition. With regards to parameters under consideration, the Worms chronicle corresponds to the general tendency in the XVI century, that is, to move genitive definitions into postposition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信