基于现实数学方法(PMR)的数学教材开发,提高SMP七年级学生的数学推理和表达能力

Ibnu Raash Aleslami, Ani Minarni, K. A. Fauzi
{"title":"基于现实数学方法(PMR)的数学教材开发,提高SMP七年级学生的数学推理和表达能力","authors":"Ibnu Raash Aleslami, Ani Minarni, K. A. Fauzi","doi":"10.33258/BIRLE.V4I1.1582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the validity and effectiveness of teaching materials developed based on a realistic mathematical approach in improving students 'mathematical reasoning and representation abilities, to analyze the increase in students' reasoning skills and mathematical representation abilities taught using teaching materials based on realistic mathematical approaches. The data were obtained through the validation sheet of teaching materials, observation sheets, student response questionnaires, mathematical reasoning ability test instruments and mathematical representation ability tests. This study uses a 4-D development model Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel by developing teaching materials with a realistic mathematical approach. Based on the results of the validation, the total average value of the RPP validity was 4.81, the student books were 4.83 and the LKPD was 4.85, the students' mathematical reasoning ability tests and the mathematical representation ability tests were in the valid category. Classical mastery of learning reaches 90.62% which has met the completeness criteria, namely ≥85% of students have reached the KKM. The increase in students' mathematical reasoning abilities using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial has increased from 0.36 to 0.50 meaning that it is in the medium category. As well as an increase in the ability of students' mathematical representation using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial, it increased from 0.43 to 0.50, meaning that it was in the medium category.","PeriodicalId":358928,"journal":{"name":"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal","volume":"313 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on the Realistic Mathematics Approach (PMR) to Improve the Mathematical Reasoning and Representation Ability of Class VII Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 47 Medan Sunggal\",\"authors\":\"Ibnu Raash Aleslami, Ani Minarni, K. A. Fauzi\",\"doi\":\"10.33258/BIRLE.V4I1.1582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the validity and effectiveness of teaching materials developed based on a realistic mathematical approach in improving students 'mathematical reasoning and representation abilities, to analyze the increase in students' reasoning skills and mathematical representation abilities taught using teaching materials based on realistic mathematical approaches. The data were obtained through the validation sheet of teaching materials, observation sheets, student response questionnaires, mathematical reasoning ability test instruments and mathematical representation ability tests. This study uses a 4-D development model Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel by developing teaching materials with a realistic mathematical approach. Based on the results of the validation, the total average value of the RPP validity was 4.81, the student books were 4.83 and the LKPD was 4.85, the students' mathematical reasoning ability tests and the mathematical representation ability tests were in the valid category. Classical mastery of learning reaches 90.62% which has met the completeness criteria, namely ≥85% of students have reached the KKM. The increase in students' mathematical reasoning abilities using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial has increased from 0.36 to 0.50 meaning that it is in the medium category. As well as an increase in the ability of students' mathematical representation using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial, it increased from 0.43 to 0.50, meaning that it was in the medium category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal\",\"volume\":\"313 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33258/BIRLE.V4I1.1582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33258/BIRLE.V4I1.1582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析基于现实数学方法编写的教材在提高学生数学推理和数学表征能力方面的有效性和有效性,分析使用基于现实数学方法的教材对学生推理能力和数学表征能力的提高。数据通过教材验证表、观察表、学生回答问卷、数学推理能力测试工具和数学表征能力测试获得。本研究采用Thiagarajan, Semmel和Semmel的四维发展模型,以现实的数学方法开发教材。根据验证结果,RPP效度的总平均值为4.81,学生书籍为4.83,LKPD为4.85,学生的数学推理能力测试和数学表征能力测试均在有效范畴内。经典学习的掌握达到90.62%,达到完备性标准,即≥85%的学生达到KKM。从N-Gain的第一次试验和第二次试验来看,学生使用基于现实数学方法的分数材料的教材的数学推理能力的提高从0.36增加到0.50,这意味着它处于中等类别。在第一次试验和第二次试验中,学生使用基于现实数学方法的分数材料的教材进行数学表示的能力也有所提高,从0.43增加到0.50,这意味着它处于中等类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on the Realistic Mathematics Approach (PMR) to Improve the Mathematical Reasoning and Representation Ability of Class VII Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 47 Medan Sunggal
This study aims to analyze the validity and effectiveness of teaching materials developed based on a realistic mathematical approach in improving students 'mathematical reasoning and representation abilities, to analyze the increase in students' reasoning skills and mathematical representation abilities taught using teaching materials based on realistic mathematical approaches. The data were obtained through the validation sheet of teaching materials, observation sheets, student response questionnaires, mathematical reasoning ability test instruments and mathematical representation ability tests. This study uses a 4-D development model Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel by developing teaching materials with a realistic mathematical approach. Based on the results of the validation, the total average value of the RPP validity was 4.81, the student books were 4.83 and the LKPD was 4.85, the students' mathematical reasoning ability tests and the mathematical representation ability tests were in the valid category. Classical mastery of learning reaches 90.62% which has met the completeness criteria, namely ≥85% of students have reached the KKM. The increase in students' mathematical reasoning abilities using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial has increased from 0.36 to 0.50 meaning that it is in the medium category. As well as an increase in the ability of students' mathematical representation using teaching materials based on a realistic mathematical approach on fraction material seen from N-Gain in the first trial and second trial, it increased from 0.43 to 0.50, meaning that it was in the medium category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信